MedUniver.com - Âñå ïî ìåäèöèíå
  ÌåäÓíèâåð - MedUniver.com Ïîèñê ïî ñàéòó è åãî ðàçäåëû Âèäåî ïî ìåäèöèíå  
  Ïîèñê è ðàçäåëû Âèäåî óðîêè  
Ðåêîìåíäóåì:
Òðàâìàòîëîãèÿ è îðòîïåäèÿ:
Òðàâìàòîëîãèÿ è îðòîïåäèÿ
Áîëåçíè ðóê è ðåàáèëèòàöèÿ ïðè íèõ
Áîëåçíè òàíöîðîâ è èõ ðåàáèëèòàöèÿ
Âîåííàÿ òðàâìàòîëîãèÿ
Äåòñêàÿ îðòîïåäèÿ
Îáùàÿ òðàâìàòîëîãèÿ
Îáùàÿ îðòîïåäèÿ
Îïåðàöèè íà êîëåííîì ñóñòàâå
Ñî÷åòàííàÿ òðàâìà
Òðàâìà ãîëîâû
Òðàâìà øåè
Òðàâìà ïëå÷à è êëþ÷èöû
Òðàâìà ïðåäïëå÷üÿ
Òðàâìà êèñòè
Òðàâìà ãðóäíîé êëåòêè - ãðóäè
Òðàâìà ïîçâîíî÷íèêà
Òðàâìà æèâîòà
Òðàâìà òàçà
Òðàâìà áåäðà
Òðàâìà ãîëåíè
Òðàâìà ñòîïû
×åðåïíî-ìîçãîâàÿ òðàâìà
Êíèãè ïî òðàâìàòîëîãèè
Êíèãè ïî õèðóðãèè
Ýíäîïðîòåçèðîâàíèå
Ôîðóì
 

Àâòîðû òðóäîâ (ñòàòåé) èñïîëüçîâàííûå ïðè ïîäãîòîâêå ìàòåðèàëîâ ïî ýíäîïðîòåçèðîâàíèþ òàçîáåäðåííîãî è êîëåííîãî ñóñòàâîâ

Ñïèñîê èñïîëüçîâàííûõ ñîêðàùåíèé â ñòàòüÿõ:

  1. ÄÌ — äîêàçàòåëüíàÿ ìåäèöèíà
  2. ÇÊÑ — çàäíÿÿ êðåñòîîáðàçíàÿ ñâÿçêà
  3. Ê — êèíåìàòè÷åñêîå âûðàâíèâàíèå
  4. îÊ — îãðàíè÷åííîå êèíåìàòè÷åñêîå âûðàâíèâàíèå
  5. ÊÒ — êîìïüþòåðíàÿ òîìîãðàôèÿ
  6. Ê×ÝÊÑ — êîìáèíèðîâàííîå ÷àñòè÷íîå ýíäîïðîòåçèðîâàíèå êîëåííîãî ñóñòàâà
  7. ËÊÑ — ëàòåðàëüíàÿ êîëëàòåðàëüíàÿ ñâÿçêà
  8. Ì — ìåõàíè÷åñêîå âûðàâíèâàíèå
  9. ÌÐÒ — ìàãíèòíî-ðåçîíàíñíàÿ òîìîãðàôèÿ
  10. ÎÀ — îñòåîàðòðèò
  11. ÎÝÊÑ — îäíîìûùåëêîâîå ýíäîïðîòåçèðîâàíèå êîëåííîãî ñóñòàâà
  12. ÏÇ — ïåðåäíåçàäíèé
  13. ÏÊÑ — ïåðåäíÿÿ êðåñòîîáðàçíàÿ ñâÿçêà
  14. ÏÔÎÀ — ïàòåëëîôåìîðàëüíûé îñòåîàðòðèò
  15. ÏÔÑ — ïàòåëëîôåìîðàëüíîå ñî÷ëåíåíèå
  16. ÏÝÒÑ — ïîâåðõíîñòíîå ýíäîïðîòåçèðîâàíèå òàçîáåäðåííîãî ñóñòàâà
  17. ÐÊÈ — ðàíäîìèçèðîâàííîå êëèíè÷åñêîå èññëåäîâàíèå
  18. ÒÝÊÑ — òîòàëüíîå ýíäîïðîòåçèðîâàíèå êîëåííîãî ñóñòàâà
  19. ÒÝÒÑ — òîòàëüíîå ýíäîïðîòåçèðîâàíèå òàçîáåäðåííîãî ñóñòàâà
  20. ÝÏÔÑ — ýíäîïðîòåçèðîâàíèå ïàòåëëîôåìîðàëüíîãî ñî÷ëåíåíèÿ
  21. CAS — êîìïüþòåðíàÿ òåõíîëîãèÿ äëÿ õèðóðãè÷åñêîãî ïëàíèðîâàíèÿ è íàâèãàöèè (îò àíãë. Computer-Assisted Surgery)
  22. ERAS — óñêîðåííàÿ ðåàáèëèòàöèÿ â ïîñëåîïåðàöèîííîì ïåðèîäå (îò àíãë. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery)
  23. HKA — óãîë ìåæäó ìåõàíè÷åñêèìè îñÿìè áåäðåííîé è áîëüøåáåðöîâîé êîñòåé (îò àíãë. Hip Knee Ankle)
  24. KSS — øêàëà Ñîîáùåñòâà ïî èçó÷åíèþ ïàòîëîãèè êîëåííîãî ñóñòàâà (îò àíãë. Knee Society Score)
  25. LDFA — óãîë íàêëîíà ñóñòàâíîé ïîâåðõíîñòè äèñòàëüíîãî ýïèôèçà áåäðåííîé êîñòè (îò àíãë. Lateral Distal Femoral Angle)
  26. MPTA — ìåäèàëüíûé óãîë íàêëîíà ïðîêñèìàëüíîé ñóñòàâíîé ïîâåðõíîñòè áîëüøåáåðöîâîé êîñòè (îò àíãë. Medial Proximal Tibial Angle)
  27. PFA — óãîë ìåæäó îñÿìè òàçà è áåäðåííîé êîñòè (îò àíãë. Pelvic Femoral Angle)
  28. PI — òàçîâûé èíäåêñ (îò àíãë. Pelvic Incidence)
  29. PSI — èíäèâèäóàëüíûå èíñòðóìåíòû (îò àíãë. Patient-Specific Instrumentation)
  30. SHR — âçàèìîîòíîøåíèÿ ìåæäó ïîçâîíî÷íèêîì è òàçîáåäðåííûì ñóñòàâîì (îò àíãë. Spine-Hip Relationship)
  31. SS — íàêëîí êðåñòöà (îò àíãë. Sacral Slope)

 õîäå ïîäãîòîâêè ñòàòåé ïî ýíäîïðîòåçèðîâàíèþ òàçîáåäðåííîãî è êîëåííîãî ñóñòàâîâ äëÿ ïîëüçîâàòåëåé ñàéòà ÌåäÓíèâåð èñïîëüçîâàíû òðóäû ñëåäóþùèõ àâòîðîâ:

  1. Provisional Quarterly Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England — Data Quality Note April 2017 to March 2018.
  2. Riviere C., Lazennec J.-Y, Van Der Straeten C., Auvinet E., Cobb J., Muirhead-Allwood S. The influence of spine—hip relations on total hip replacement: a systematic review // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 4. P. 559—568.
  3. Riviere C. Kinematic versus conventional alignment techniques for total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective case control study // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2019. Vol. 105. P. 895-905.
  4. Howell S.M., Papadopoulos S., Kuznik K.T., Hull M.L. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013. Vol. 21, N 10. P. 2271-2280.
  5. Riviere C., Iranpour E, Auvinet E., Howell S., Vendittoli P.-À., Cobb J. et al. Alignment options for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review // Orthop. Traumatol Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 7. P. 1047-1056.
  6. Almaawi A.M., Hutt J.R.B., Masse V, Lavigne M., Vendittoli P.-À. The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty// J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 7. P. 2133—2140.
  7. Hutt J.R.B., LeBlanc M.-A., Masse V, Lavigne M., Vendittoli P.-À. Kinematic TKA using navigation: surgical technique and initial results // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2016. Vol. 102, N 1. P. 99-104.
  8. Price A.J., Alvand A., Troelsen A., Katz J.N., Hooper G., Gray A. et al. Knee replacement // Lancet. 2018. Vol. 392, N 10 158. P. 1672-1682.
  9. Takahashi T., Ansari J., Pandit H. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty or mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty // J. Knee Surg. 2018. Vol. 31, N 10. P. 999-1006.
  10. Dagneaux L., Marouby S., Lazic S., Canovas F., Riviere C. Dual mobility device reduces the risk of prosthetic hip instability for patients with degenerated spine: a case-control study// Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2019. Vol. 105. P. 461-466.
  11. Grammatopoulos G., Speirs A.D., Ng K.C.G., Riviere C., Rakhra K.S., Lamontagne M. et al. Acetabular and spino-pelvic morphologies are different in subjects with symptomatic cam femoro-acetabular impingement: acetabular and spinopelvic morphology in FA1 //J. Orthop. Res. 2018. Vol. 36, N 7. P. 1840-1848.
  12. Taunton M.J., Trousdale R.T., Sierra R.J., Kaufman K., Pagnano M.W. John Charnley Award: randomized clinical trial of direct anterior and miniposterior approach THA // Clin. Orthop. 2018. Vol. 476, N 2. P. 216-229.
  13. Burn E., Liddle A.D., Hamilton T.W., Judge A., Pandit H.G., Murray D.W. et al. Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement: a population-based study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales// BMJ Open. 2018. Vol. 8, N 4. Article ID e020977.
  14. Commitee N.S. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: 15th annual report, 2017. National Joint Registry Centre, 2018.
  15. Arirachakaran A., Choowit P., Putananon C., Muangsiri S., Kongtharvonskul J. Is unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) superior to total knee arthroplasty (ÒÊÀ)? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial // Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2015. Vol. 25, N 5. P. 799-806.
  16. Fabre-Aubrespy M., Ollivier M., Pesenti S., Parratte S., Argenson J.-N. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients older than 75 results in better clinical outcomes and similar survivorship compared to total knee arthroplasty. A matched controlled study // J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N 12. P. 2668—2671.
  17. Liddle A.D., Judge A., Pandit H., Murray D.W. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101 330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales // Lancet. 2014. Vol. 384, N 9952. P. 1437-1445.
  18. Longstaff L.M., Sloan Ê., Stamp N., Scaddan M., Beaver R. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function // J. Arthroplasty. 2009. Vol. 24, N 4. P. 570-578. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/18534396 (date of access July 30, 2018)
  19. Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2009. Vol. 24, N 4. P. 560—569. URL: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18534397 (date of access July 30, 2018)
  20. Ritter M.A., Davis K.E., Meding J.B., Pierson J.L., Berend M.E., Malinzak R.A. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011. Vol. 93, N 17. P. 1588—1596. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/21915573
  21. Benjamin J. Component alignment in total knee arthroplasty // Instr. Course Leet. 2006. Vol. 55. P. 405—412. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16958475 (date of access July 31, 2018)
  22. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1989. Vol. 248. P. 9—12. URL: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2805502 (date of access August 12, 2018)
  23. Scuderi G.R., Bourne R.B., Noble P.C., Benjamin J.B., Lonner J.H., Scott W.N. The new knee society knee scoring system // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012. Vol. 470, N 1. P. 3-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/sll999-011-2135-0 (date of access July 30, 2018)
  24. Moreland J.R., Bassett L.W., Hanker G.J. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1987. Vol. 69, N 5. P. 745—749. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3597474 (date of access August 11, 2018)
  25. Fang D.M., Ritter M.A., Davis K.E. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2009. Vol. 24, N 6. P. 39—43. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/19553073 (date of access August 11, 2018)
  26. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement //J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1991. Vol. 73, N 5. P. 709—714. URL: http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1894655 (date of access August 9, 2018)
  27. Bourne R.B., Chesworth B.M., Davis A.M., Mahomed N.N., Charron K.D.J. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010. Vol. 468, NLP. 57—63. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/19844772 (date of access June 3, 2018)
  28. Hollister A.M., Jatana S., Singh A.K., Sullivan W.W., Lupichuk A.G. The axes of rotation of the knee // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1993. Vol. 290. P. 259-268. URL: http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8472457 (date of access June 3, 2018)
  29. Eckhoff D.G. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005. Vol. 87, suppl. 2. P. 71—80. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00440 (date of access August 12, 2018)
  30. Allen A.M., Ward W.G., Pope T.L. Imaging of the total knee arthroplasty // Radiol. Clin. North Am. 1995. Vol. 33, N 2. P. 289—303. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/7871170 (date of access August 12, 2018)
  31. Dossett H.G., Swartz G.J., Estrada N.A., LeFevre G.W., Kwasman B.G. Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty // Orthopedics. 2012. Vol. 35, N 2. P. e 160—el69. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22310400 (date of access August 11, 2018)
  32. Lee Y.S., Howell S.M., Won Y.-Y., Lee Î.-S., Lee S.H., Vahedi H. et al. Kinematic alignment is a possible alternative to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2017. Vol. 25, N 11. P. 3467—3479. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28439636 (date of access September 30, 2018)
  33. Figgie H.E., Goldberg V.M., Heiple K.G., Moller H.S., Gordon N.H. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis //J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1986. Vol. 68, N 7. P. 1035—1040. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3745240 (date of access March 24, 2019)
  34. Kayler D.E., Lyttle D. Surgical interruption of patellar blood supply by total knee arthroplasty// Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1988. Vol. 229. P. 221—227. URL: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3349681 (date of access March 24, 2019)
  35. Weale A.E., Murray D.W., Newman J.H., Ackroyd C.E. The length of the patellar tendon after unicompartmental and total knee replacement //J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1999. Vol. 81, N 5. P. 790—795. URL. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10530838 (date of access March 24, 2019)
  36. Lee G.-C., Cushner F.D., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N. Optimizing patellofemoral tracking during total knee arthroplasty // J. Knee Surg. 2004. Vol. 17, N 3. P. 144—149. URL. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15366269 (date of access March 24, 2019)
  37. Brilhault J., Ries M.D. Measuring patellar height using the lateral active flexion radiograph: effect of total knee implant design // Knee. 2010. Vol. 17, N 2. P. 148—151. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19720535 (date of access March 24, 2019)
  38. Insall J., Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint // Radiology. 1971. Vol. 101, N I. P. 101 — 104. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/511196l (date of access March 24, 2019)
  39. Grelsamer R.P., Meadows S. The modified Insall-Salvati ratio for assessment of patellar height // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1992. Vol. 282. P. 170—176. URL: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1516309 (date of access March 24, 2019)
  40. Patel D.V, Ferris B.D., Aichroth P.M. Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement // Int. Orthop. 1991. Vol. 15, N 3. P. 209—210. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/BF00!92296 (date of access August 12, 2018)
  41. Park A., Stambough J.B., Nunley R.M., Barrack R.L., Nam D. The inadequacy of short knee radiographs in evaluating coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N 4. P. 878—82. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/26410551 (date of access September 12, 2018)
  42. Abu-Rajab R.B., Deakin A.H., Kandasami M., McGlynn J., Picard E, Kinninmonth A.W.G. Hip—knee—ankle radiographs are more appropriate for assessment of postoperative mechanical alignment of total knee arthroplasties than standard AP knee radiographs//J. Arthroplasty. 2015. Vol. 30, N 4. P. 695-700. URL: http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25702592 (date of access August 12, 2018)
  43. Hutt J., Masse V., Lavigne M., Vendittoli P.-À. Functional joint line obliquity after kinematic total knee arthroplasty// Int. Orthop. 2016. Vol. 40, N I. P. 29-34. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25795248 (date of access August 12, 2018)
  44. Dennis D.A. Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2004. Vol. 19, N 4. Suppl. 1. P. 35—40. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15190547 (date of access September 30, 2018)
  45. Mandalia V, Eyres K., Schranz P., Toms A.D. Evaluation of patients with a painful total knee replacement //J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2008. Vol. 90, N 3. P. 265-271. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18310744 (date of access September 30, 2018)
  46. Toms A.D., Mandalia V, Haigh R., Hopwood B. The management of patients with painful total knee replacement // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009. Vol. 91, N 2. P. 143—150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91 B2.20995 (date of access September 30, 2018)
  47. Bathis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., Luring C., Zurakowski D., Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique// J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004. Vol. 86, N 5. P. 682-687. URL: http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15274263 (date of access September 30, 2018)
  48. Skytta E.T., Lohman M., Tallroth K., Remes V. Comparison of standard anteroposterior knee and hip-to-ankle radiographs in determining the lower limb and implant alignment after total knee arthroplasty // Scand. J. Surg. 2009. Vol. 98, N 4. P. 250-253. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20218424 (date of access September 30, 2018)
  49. Takai S., Yoshino N., Isshiki T., Hirasawa Y. Kneeling view: a new roentgeno-graphic technique to assess rotational deformity and alignment of the distal femur // J. Arthroplasty. 2003. Vol. 18, N 4. P. 478—483. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/12820092 (date of access August 12, 2018)
  50. Eckhoff D.G., Piatt B.E., Gnadinger C.A., Blaschke R.C. Assessing rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1995. Vol. 318. P. 176-181. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7671514 (date of access August 12, 2018)
  51. Jazrawi L.M., Birdzell L., Kummer F.J., Di Cesare P.E. The accuracy of computed tomography for determining femoral and tibial total knee arthroplasty component rotation //J. Arthroplasty. 2000. Vol. 15, N 6. P. 761—766.URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/11021452 (date of access August 12, 2018)
  52. Liu Í., Auvinet Å., Giles J., Rodriguez F. Augmented reality based navigation for computer assisted hip resurfacing: a proof of concept study // Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2018. Vol. 46, N 10. P. 1595-1605.
  53. Gregory T., Gregory J., Sledge J., Allard R., Mir O. Surgery guided by mixed reality: presentation of a proof of concept // Acta Orthop. 2018. Vol. 89, N 5. P. 480—483.
  54. Auvinet E., Galna B., Aframian A., Cobb J. 0100: validation of the precision of the Microsoft Holo Lens augmented reality headset head and hand motion measurement // Gait Posture. 2017. Vol. 57, N 1. P. 175-176.
  55. Fotouhi J., Alexander C.P., Unberath M., Taylor G., Lee S.C., Fuerst B. et al. Plan in 2D, execute in 3D: an augmented reality solution for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty// J. Med. Imaging. 2018. Vol. 5, N 2. Article ID 021205.
  56. van Duren B.H., Sugand K., Wescott R., Carrington R., Hart A. Augmented reality fluoroscopy simulation of the guide-wire insertion in DHS surgery: a proof of concept study // Med. Eng. Phys. 2018. Vol. 55. P. 52—59.
  57. Hiranaka T., Fujishiro T., Hida Y, Shibata Y., Tsubosaka M., Nakanishi Y. et al. Augmented reality: the use of the PicoLinker smart glasses improves wire insertion under fluoroscopy // World J. Orthop. 2017. Vol. 8, N 12. P. 891—894.
  58. Dario P., Tonet O., Megali G. A novel mechatronic tool for computer-assisted arthroscopy // IEEE Trans. Inf. TechnoL Biomed. 2000. Vol. 4, N 1. P. 15.
  59. Logishetty K., Western L., Morgan R., Iranpour E, Cobb J.P., Auvinet E. Can an augmented reality headset improve accuracy of acetabular cup orientation in simulated THA? A randomized trial // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2019. Vol. 477. P. 1190—1199.
  60. Ota D., Loftin B., Saito T., Lea R., Keller J. Virtual reality in surgical education // Comput. Biol. Med. 1995. Vol. 25, N 2. P. 127—137.
  61. Seymour N.E., Gallagher A.G., Roman S.A., O’Brien M.K., Bansal V.K., Andersen D.K. et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance results of a randomized, double-blinded study // Ann. Surg. 2002. Vol. 236, N 4. P. 458-464.
  62. De Luca G., Choudhury N., Pagiatakis C., Laroche D. A multi-procedural virtual reality simulator for orthopaedic training // Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Applications and Case Studies. HCII 2019. 2019. P. 256—271.
  63. van der List J.P., Chawla H., Joskowicz L., Pearle A.D. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2016. Vol. 24. P. 3482-3495.
  64. Lonner J.H., Moretti V.M. The evolution of image-free robotic assistance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty // Am. J. Orthop. (Belle Mead, NJ). 2016. Vol. 45. P. 249-254.
  65. Ponzio D.Y., Lonner J.H. Robotic technology produces more conservative tibial resection than conventional techniques in UKA//Am. J. Orthop. (Belle Mead, NJ). 2016. Vol. 45. P. E465-E468.
  66. Weber P., Schroder C., Laubender R.P. et al. Joint line reconstruction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and validation of a measurement method // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013. Vol. 21. P. 2468—2473.
  67. Herry Y, Batailler C., Lording T., Servien E., Neyret P., Lustig S. Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique // Int. Orthop. 2017. Vol. 41. P. 2265-2271.
  68. Bell S.W., Anthony L, Jones B., MacLean A., Rowe P., Blyth M. Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2016. Vol. 98. P. 627-635.
  69. Marcovigi A., Zambianchi E, Sandoni D., Rivi E., Catani E Robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty: a single centre experience // Acta Biomed. 2017. Vol. 88. P. 54—59.
  70. Pearle A.D., van der List J. P., Lee L., Coon T.M., Borus T.A., Roche M.W. Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up // Knee. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 419—428.
  71. Plate J.F., Augart M.A., Seyler T.M. et al. Obesity has no effect on outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2017. Vol. 25. P. 645-651.
  72. Gladnick B.P., Nam D., Khamaisy S., Paul S., Pearle A.D. Onlay tibial implants appear to provide superior clinical results in robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty// HSS J. 2015. Vol. 11. P. 43-49.
  73. Turktas U., Piskin A., Poehling G.G. Short-term outcomes of robotically assisted patello-femoral arthroplasty // Int. Orthop. 2016. Vol. 40. P. 919—924.
  74. Cip J., Widemschek M., Luegmair M., Sheinkop M.B., Benesch T., Martin A. Conventional versus computer-assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 5-year follow-up of 200 patients in a prospective randomized comparative trial //J. Arthroplasty. 2014. Vol. 29. P. 1795-1802.
  75. Blakeney W, Clement J., Desmeules E, Hagemeister N., Riviere C., Vendittoli P.A. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019. Vol. 27. P. 1410-1417.
  76. Courtney P.M., Lee G.C. Early outcomes of kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of the literature // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32. P. 2028-2032.
  77. Yeo J.H., Seon J.K., Lee D.H., Song E.K. No difference in outcomes and gait analysis between mechanical and kinematic knee alignment methods using robotic total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019. Vol. 27. P. 2385.
  78. Calliess T., Ettinger M., Savov P., Karkosch R., Windhagen H. Individualized alignment in total knee arthroplasty using image-based robotic assistance: video article // Orthopade. 2018. Vol. 47. P. 871-879.
  79. Urish K.L., Conditt Ì., Roche Ì., Rubash Í.Å. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: surgical assistant for a customized normal kinematic knee // Orthopedics. 2016. Vol. 39. P. e822—e827.
  80. Stirling Ð., Valsalan Mannambeth R., Soler A., Batta V., Malhotra R.K., Kalairajah Y. Computerised tomography vs magnetic resonance imaging for modeling of patientspecific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty //World J. Orthop. 2015. Vol. 6, N 2. P. 290-297.
  81. Fu H., Wang J., Zhou S., Cheng T., Zhang W., Wang Q. et al. No difference in mechanical alignment and femoral component placement between patient-specific instrumentation and conventional instrumentation in TKA // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2015. Vol. 23, N 11. P. 3288-3295.
  82. Jiang J., Kang X., Lin Q., Teng Y., An L., Ma J. et al. Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty// Orthopedics. 2015. Vol. 38, N 4. P. e305-e313.
  83. Shen C., Tang Z.H., Hu J.Z., Zou G.Y., Xiao R.C., Yan D.X. Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty // Orthopedics. 2015. Vol. 38, N3. P. el78—el88.
  84. Zhang Q.M., Chen J.Y., Li H., Chai W., Ni M., Zhang Z.D. et al. No evidence of superiority in reducing outliers of component alignment for patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review // Orthop. Surg. 2015. Vol. 7, N 1. P. 19-25.
  85. Sharareh B., Schwarzkopf R. Review article: patient-specific versus standard instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty // J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong). 2015. Vol. 23, N 1. P. 100-106.
  86. Cavaignac E., Pailhe R., Laumond G., Murgier J., Reina N., Laffosse J.M. et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis // Int. Orthop. 2015. Vol. 39, N 8. P. 1541 — 1552.
  87. Thienpont E., Schwab P.E., Fennema P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-specific instrumentation for improving alignment of the components in total knee replacement // Bone Joint J. 2014. P. 96-B, N 8. P. 1052—1061.
  88. Ageberg E., Bjorkman A., Rosen B., Roos E.M. Principles ofbrain plasticity in improving sensorimotor function of the knee and leg in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury: a double-blind randomized exploratory trial // BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2012. Vol. 13. P. 68.
  89. Mannan A., Akinyooye D., Hossain F. A meta-analysis of functional outcomes in patient-specific instrumented knee arthroplasty // J. Knee Surg. 2017. Vol. 30, N 7. P. 668-674.
  90. Hutt J.R.B., LeBlanc M.A., Masse V, Lavigne M., Vendittoli P.A. Kinematic TKA using navigation: surgical technique and initial results // Orthop. Traumatol Surg. Res. 2016. Vol. 102, N 1. P. 99-104.
  91. Almaawi A.M., Hutt J.R.B., Masse V, Lavigne M., Vendittoli P.-À. The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty //J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 7. P. 2133-2140.
  92. Nabavi A., Olwill C.M., Do M., Wanasawage T., Harris LA. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty // J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong). 2017. Vol. 25, N 1. Article ID 2309499016684754.
  93. Lyras D.N., Greenhow R., Loucks C. Restoration of the mechanical axis in total knee artrhoplasty using patient-matched technology cutting blocks. A retrospective study of 132 cases //Arch. Bone Joint Surg. 2017. Vol. 5, N 5. P. 283-289.
  94. Koch P.P., Muller D., Pisan M., Fucentese S.F. Radiographic accuracy in TKA with a CT-based patient-specific cutting block technique // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013. Vol. 21, N 10. P. 2200-2205.
  95. Anderl W., Pauzenberger L., Kolblinger R., Kiesselbach G., Brandl G., Laky B. et al. Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2016. Vol. 24, N 1. P. 102—111.
  96. Thienpont E., Schwab P.E., Fennema P. Efficacy of patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2017. Vol. 99, N 6. P. 521-530.
  97. Barrack R.L., Ruh E.L., Williams B.M., Ford A.D., Foreman K., Nunley R.M. Patient-specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2012. Vol. 94, N 11. Suppl. A. P. 95-99.
  98. Plaskos C., Hodgson A.J., Inkpen K., McGraw R.W. Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty //J. Arthroplasty. 2002. Vol. 17, N 6. P. 698—705.
  99. Jones G.G., Logishetty K., Clarke S., Collins R., Jaere M., Harris S. et al. Do patientspecific instruments (PSI) for UKA allow non-expert surgeons to achieve the same saw cut accuracy as expert surgeons? // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2018. Vol. 138. P. 1601-1608.
  100. Calliess Ò., Bauer Ê., Stukenborg-Colsman Ñ., Windhagen Í., Budde S., Ettinger Ì. PSI kinematic versus non-PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2017. Vol. 25, N 6. P. 1743.
  101. Courtney P.M., Lee G.C. Early outcomes of kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of the literature // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 6. P. 2028.
  102. Dossett H.G., Estrada N.A., Swartz G.J., LeFevre G.W., Kwasman B.G. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results // Bone Joint J. Br. 2014. Vol. 96, N 7. P. 907.
  103. Lee Y.S., Howell S.M., Won Y.Y., Lee O.S., Lee S.H., Vahedi H. et al. Kinematic alignment is a possible alternative to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2017. Vol. 25, N 11. P. 3467.
  104. Nam D., Nunley R.M., Barrack R.L. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern? // Bone Joint J. 2014. Vol. 96-B, N 11. Suppl. A. P. 96.
  105. Li Y., Wang S., Wang Y., Yang M. Does kinematic alignment improve short-term functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty compared with mechanical alignment? A systematic review and meta-analysis// J. Knee Surg. 2018. Vol. 31, N 1. P. 78.
  106. Matsumoto T., Takayama K., Ishida K., Hayashi S., Hashimoto S., Kuroda R. Radiological and clinical comparison of kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty// Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 5. P. 640.
  107. Nakamura S., Tian Y, Tanaka Y., Kuriyama S., Ito H., Furu M., Matsuda S. The effects of kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty on stress at the medial tibia: a case study for varus knee // Bone Joint Res. 2017. Vol. 6, N 1. P. 43.
  108. Waterson H.B., Clement N.D., Eyres K.S., Mandalia VI., Toms A.D. The early outcome of kinematic versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised control trial // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B, N 10. P. 1360.
  109. Young S.W., Walker M.L., Bayan A., Briant-Evans T., Pavlou P., Farrington B. The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: no difference in 2-year functional outcomes using kinematic versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled clinical trial // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2017. Vol. 475, N 1. P. 9.
  110. Howell S.M., Shelton T.J., Hull M.L. Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty//J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33. P. 3678.
  111. Niki Y, Nagura T., Nagai K., Kobayashi S., Harato K. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reduces knee adduction moment more than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2018. Vol. 26, N 6. P. 1629.
  112. Blakeney W, Clement J., Ing M., Desmeules E, Hagemeister N., Riviere C., Vendittoli P. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019. Vol. 27. P. 1410-1417.
  113. Roth J.D., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Native knee laxities at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion and their relationship to the goal of the gap-balancing alignment method of total knee arthroplasty // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2015. Vol. 97, N 20. P. 1678.
  114. Roth J.D., Hull M.L., Howell S.M. The limits of passive motion are variable between and unrelated within normal tibiofemoral joints //J. Orthop. Res. 2015. Vol. 33, N II. P. 1594.
  115. Roth J.D., Hull M.L., Howell S.M. Analysis of differences in laxities and neutral positions from native after kinematically aligned TKA using cruciate retaining implants // J. Orthop. Res. 2019. Vol. 37. P. 358-369.
  116. Shelton T.J., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. A total knee arthroplasty is stiffer when the intraoperative tibial force is greater than the native knee // J. Knee Surg. 2019. Vol. 32. P. 1008-1014.
  117. Shelton T.J., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Is there a force target that predicts early patient-reported outcomes after kinematically aligned TKA? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2019. Vol. 477. P. 1200-1207.
  118. Shelton T.J., Nedopil A.J., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Do varus or valgus outliers have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments than those which are in-range after a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Limb and joint line alignment after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty//Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 10. P. 1319.
  119. Johnson J.M., Mahfouz M.R., Midillioglu M.R., Nedopil A.J., Howell S.M. Three-dimensional analysis of the tibial resection plane relative to the arthritic tibial plateau in total knee arthroplasty // J. Exp. Orthop. 2017. Vol. 4, N 1. P. 27.
  120. Nedopil A.J., Singh A.K., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Does calipered kinematically aligned TKA restore native left to right symmetry of the lower limb and improve function? //J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 2. P. 398.
  121. Riviere C., Iranpour E, Harris S., Auvinet E., Aframian A., Chabrand P., Cobb J. The kinematic alignment technique for TKA reliably aligns the femoral component with the cylindrical axis//Orthop. TraumatoL Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 7. P. 1069.
  122. Nedopil A.J., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. What mechanisms are associated with tibial component failure after kinematically-aligned total knee arthroplasty? // Int. Orthop. 2017.Vol. 41, N 8. P. 1561.
  123. Nedopil A.J., Howell S.M., Rudert M., Roth J., Hull M.L. How frequent is rotational mismatch within 0 degrees +/—10 degrees in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? // Orthopedics. 2013. Vol. 36, N. 12. P. e 1515.
  124. Coughlin K.M., Incavo S.J., Churchill D.L., Beynnon B.D. Tibial axis and patellar position relative to the femoral epicondylar axis during squatting // J. Arthroplasty. 2003. Vol. 18, N 8. P. 1048.
  125. Hollister A.M., Jatana S., Singh A.K., Sullivan W.W., Lupichuk A.G. The axes of rotation of the knee // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1993. Vol. 290. P. 259.
  126. Iranpour F., Merican A.M., Baena F.R., Cobb J.P., Amis A.A. Patellofemoral joint kinematics: the circular path of the patella around the trochlear axis // J. Orthop. Res. 2010. Vol. 28, N 5. P. 589.
  127. Pinskerova V, Iwaki H., Freeman M.A. The shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia at the knee // Orthopade. 2000. Vol. 29, suppl. 1. P. S3.
  128. Iwaki H., Pinskerova V, Freeman M.A. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2000. Vol. 82, N 8. P. 1189.
  129. Weber W.E., Weber E.F.M. Mechanik der menschlichen Gehwerkzeuge. Gottingen : Verlag der Dietrichschen Buchhandlung, 1836.
  130. Eckhoff D.G., Bach J.M., Spitzer V.M., Reinig K.D, Bagur M.M., Baldini Ò.Í. et al Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality //J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005. Vol. 87, suppl. 2. P. 71.
  131. Nedopil A.J., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Does malrotation of the tibial and femoral components compromise function in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2016. Vol. 47,N 1. P. 41.
  132. Paschos N.K., Howell S.M., Johnson J.M., Mahfouz M.R. Can kinematic tibial templates assist the surgeon locating the flexion and extension plane of the knee? // Knee. 2017.Vol. 24, N 5. P. 1006.
  133. Nam D., Lin K.M., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0 degrees and 90 degrees in the osteoarthritic knee treated with total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2014. Vol. 22, N 12. P. 2975.
  134. Singh A.K., Nedopil A.J., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Does alignment of the limb and tibial width determine relative narrowing between compartments when planning mechanically aligned TKA? // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2017. Vol. 138, N 1. P. 91.
  135. Bellemans J., Colyn W., Vandenneucker H., Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012. Vol. 470, N 1. P. 45.
  136. Shetty G.M., Mullaji A., Bhayde S., Nha K.W., Oh H.K. Factors contributing to inherent varus alignment of lower limb in normal Asian adults: role of tibial plateau inclination // Knee. 2014. Vol. 21, N 2. P. 544.
  137. Song M.H., Yoo S.H., Kang S.W., Kim Y.J., Park G.T., Pyeun Y.S. Coronal alignment of the lower limb and the incidence of constitutional varus knee in Korean females // Knee Surg. Relat. Res. 2015. Vol. 27, N 1. P. 49.
  138. Gu Y., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Simulation of total knee arthroplasty in 5 degrees or 7 degrees valgus: a study of gap imbalances and changes in limb and knee alignments from native//J. Orthop. Res. 2017. Vol. 35, N 9. P. 2031.
  139. Gu Y, Roth J.D., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. How frequently do four methods for mechanically aligning a total knee arthroplasty cause collateral ligament imbalance and change alignment from normal in white patients? // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2014. Vol. 96, N 12. P. e101.
  140. Delport H., Labey L., Innocenti B., De Corte R., Vander Sloten J., Bellemans J. Restoration of constitutional alignment in TKA leads to more physiological strains in the collateral ligaments // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2015. Vol. 23, N 8. P. 2159.
  141. Meneghini R.M., Ziemba-Davis M.M., Lovro L.R., Ireland P.H., Damer B.M. Can intraoperative sensors determine the «target» ligament balance? Early outcomes in total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N 10. P. 2181.
  142. Roth J.D., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty limits high tibial forces, differences in tibial forces between compartments, and abnormal tibial contact kinematics during passive flexion // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2018.Vol. 26, N 6. P. 1589.
  143. Verstraete M.A., Meere P.A., Salvadore G., Victor J., Walker P.S. Contact forces in the tibiofemoral joint from soft tissue tensions: implications to soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty // J. Biomech. 2017. Vol. 58. P. 195.
  144. Ji Í.Ì., Han J., Jin D.S., Seo H., Won Y.Y. Kinematically aligned TKA can align knee joint line to horizontal // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2016. Vol. 24, N 8. P. 2436.
  145. Eckhoff D., Hogan C., DiMatteo L., Robinson M., Bach J. Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007. Vol. 461. P. 238.
  146. Howell S.M., Kuznik K., Hull M.L., Siston R.A. Longitudinal shapes of the tibia and femur are unrelated and variable // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010. Vol. 468, N 4. P. 1142.
  147. Howell S.M., Papadopoulos S., Kuznik K.T., Hull M.L. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013. Vol. 21, N 10. P. 2271.
  148. Brar A.S., Howell S.M., Hull M.L., Mahfouz M.R. Does kinematic alignment and flexion of a femoral component designed for mechanical alignment reduce the proximal and lateral reach of the trochlea? // J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N 8. P. 1808.
  149. Ettinger M., Calliess T., Howell S.M. Does a positioning rod or a patient-specific guide result in more natural femoral flexion in the concept of kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? //Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2017. Vol. 137, N I. P. 105.
  150. Nedopil A.J., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. What clinical characteristics and radiographic parameters are associated with patellofemoral instability after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? // Int. Orthop. 2017. Vol. 41, N 2. P. 283.
  151. Howell S.M., Chen J., Hull M.L. Variability of the location of the tibial tubercle affects the rotational alignment of the tibial component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty// Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013. Vol. 21, N 10. P. 2288.
  152. Christen B., Heesterbeek P., Wymenga A., Wehrli U. Posterior cruciate ligament balancing in total knee replacement: the quantitative relationship between tightness of the flexion gap and tibial translation // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2007. Vol. 89, N 8. P. 1046.
  153. Howell S.M., Howell S.J., Kuznik K.T., Cohen J., Hull M.L. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013. Vol. 471, N 3. P. 1000.
  154. Howell S.M., Papadopoulos S., Kuznik K., Ghaly L.R., Hull M.L. Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? // Int. Orthop. 2015. Vol. 39, N 11. P. 2117—2124.
  155. Ritter M.A., Davis K.E., Meding J.B., Pierson J.L., Berend M.E., Malinzak R.A. The effect of alignment and  MI on failure of total knee replacement // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011. Vol. 93, N 17. P. 1588.
  156. Lozano R., Campanelli V, Howell S., Hull M. Kinematic alignment more closely restores the groove location and the sulcus angle of the native trochlea than mechanical alignment: implications for prosthetic design // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019.Vol. 27. P. 1504-1513.
  157. Riviere C., Iranpour F., Harris S., Auvinet E., Aframian A., Parratte S., Cobb J. Differences in trochlear parameters between native and prosthetic kinematically or mechanically aligned knees // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2018. Vol. 104, N 2. P. 165.
  158. Parratte S., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., Berry D.J. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010. Vol. 92, N 12. P. 2143.
  159. Bonner T.J., Eardley W.G., Patterson P., Gregg P.J. The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2011. Vol. 93, N 9. P. 1217.
  160. Cushner F.D., La Rosa D.F., Vigorita V.J., Scuderi G.R, Scott W.N., Insall J.N. A quantitative histologic comparison: ACL degeneration in the osteoarthritic knee // J. Arthroplasty. 2003. Vol. 18. P. 687-692.
  161. Townley C.O. Articular-plate replacement arthroplasty for the knee joint. 1964 // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1988. Vol. 236. P. 3—7.
  162. Robinson R.P. The early innovators of today’s resurfacing condylar knees // J. Arthroplasty. 2005. Vol. 20, N 1. P. 2—26.
  163. Pritchett J.W. Total articular knee replacement using polyurethane // J. Knee Surg. 2019. Vol. 32, N 3. P. 101-106.
  164. Insall J.N. Presidential address to the Knee Society. Choices and compromises in total knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1988. Vol. 226. P. 43-48.
  165. Redler I. Polymer osteosynthesis. A clinical trial of Ostamer in forty-two patients // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1962. Vol. 44. P. 1621—1652.
  166. Townley C.O. Knee joint arthroplasty: long-term results of the tibial articular replacement plate and its current use in an anatomic total knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1973. Vol. 94. P. 311-132.
  167. Sabouret P., Lavoie E, Cloutier J. M. Total knee replacement with retention of both cruciate ligaments: a 22-year follow-up study // Bone Joint J. 2013. Vol. 95-B. P. 917—922.
  168. Fuchs S., Tibescu C.O., Genkinger M., Laass H., Rosenbaum D. Proprioception with bicondylar sledge design prostheses retaining cruciate ligaments // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003. Vol. 406. P. 148-154.
  169. Komistek R.D., Allain J., Anderson D.T., Dennis D.A., Goutallier D. In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2002. Vol. 404. P. 315-325.
  170. Stiehl J.B., Komistek R.D., Cloutier J.M., Dennis D.A. The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties // J. Arthroplasty. 2000. Vol. 15. P. 545-550.
  171. Christensen J.C., Brothers J., Stoddard G.J. et al. Higher frequency of reoperation with a new bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2017. Vol. 475. P. 62-69.
  172. Townley C.O. The anatomic total knee resurfacing arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1985. Vol. 192. P. 82-96.
  173. Townley C.O. Total knee arthroplasty. A personal retrospective and prospective review // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1988. Vol. 236. P. 8-22.
  174. Buechel F.F., Pappas M.J. Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1990. Vol. 260. P. 162-169.
  175. Pritchett J.W. Bicruciate-retaining total knee replacement provides satisfactory function and implant survivorship at 23 years // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2015. Vol. 473. P. 2327-2333.
  176. Pritchett J.W. Anterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 1996. Vol. 11. P. 194-197.
  177. Pritchett J.W. Patient preferences in knee prostheses // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004. Vol. 86. P. 979-982.
  178. Pritchett J.W. Patients prefer a bicruciate-retaining or the medial pivot total knee prosthesis // J. Arthroplasty. 2011. Vol. 26. P. 224—228.
  179. Pritchett J.W. Heat generated by knee prostheses // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2006. Vol. 442. P. 195-198.
  180. Pritchett J.W. A comparison of the noise generated from different types of knee prostheses //J. Knee Surg. 2013. Vol. 26. P. 101 — 104.
  181. Pinskerova V, Johal P., Nakagawa S. et al. Does the femur roll-back with flexion? // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004. Vol. 86. P. 925-931.
  182. Tria A.J. Jr. A contemporary bicruciate total knee arthroplasty // Semin. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 28. P. 65-70.
  183. Campbell W. Interposition of vitallium plates in arthroplasties of the knee // Am. J. Surg. 1940.Vol. 47, N 3. P. 639-641.
  184. Smith-Petersen M.N. Evolution of mould arthroplasty of the hip joint // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1948. Vol. 30, N 1. P. 59-75.
  185. Jones W.N. Mold arthroplasty of the knee joint // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1969. Vol. 66. P. 82-89.
  186. Insall J.N., Hood R.W., Flawn L.B., Sullivan DJ. The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. A five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1983. Vol. 65, N 5. P. 619—628.
  187. Hitt K., Shurman J.R. 2nd, Greene K., McCarthy J., Moskal J., Hoeman T. et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems//J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2003. Vol. 85, suppl. 4. P. 115—122.
  188. Bonnin M.P., Saffarini M., Bossard N., Dantony E., Victor J. Morphometric analysis of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty and native knees // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B, N 1. P. 49-57.
  189. Howell S.M., Howell S.J., Hull M.L. Assessment of the radii of the medial and lateral femoral condyles in varus and valgus knees with osteoarthritis // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010. Vol. 92, N 1. P. 98-104.
  190. Bellemans J., Colyn W., Vandenneucker H., Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus//Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012. Vol. 470, N I. P. 45-53.
  191. Bonnin M.P., Saffarini M., Mercier P.E., Laurent J. R., Carrillon Y. Is the anterior tibial tuberosity a reliable rotational landmark for the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty? // .1. Arthroplasty. 2011. Vol. 26, N 2. P. 260.el—267.e2.
  192. Bonnin M.P., Saffarini M., Shepherd D., Bossard N., Dantony E. Oversizing the tibial component in TKAs: incidence, consequences and risk factors // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2016. Vol. 24, N 8. P. 2532-2540.
  193. Bonnin M.P., Schmidt A., Basiglini L., Bossard N., Dantony E. Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013. Vol. 21, N 10. P. 2314-2324.
  194. Mahoney O.M., Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010. Vol. 92, N 5. P. 1115-1121.
  195. Insall J. Total knee replacement // Surgery of the Knee. New York : Churchill Livingstone, 1984. P. 587-695.
  196. Berger R.A., Crossett L.S., Jacobs J.J., Rubash H.E. Malrotation causing patello-femoral complications after total knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998. Vol. 356. P. 144-153.
  197. Howell S.M., Howell S.J., Kuznik K.T., Cohen J., Hull M.L. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013. Vol. 471, N 3. P. 1000-1007.
  198. Parratte S., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., Berry D.J. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010. Vol. 92, N 12. P. 2143—2149.
  199. Bonnin M., Laurent J.R., Parratte S., Zadegan F., Badet R., Bissery A. Can patients really do sport after TKA? // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2010. Vol. 18, N 7. P. 853-862.
  200. Bonnin M.P., Basiglini L., Archbold H.A. What are the factors of residual pain after uncomplicated TKA? // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2011. Vol. 19, N 9. P. 1411-1417.
  201. Bourne R.B., Chesworth B.M., Davis A.M., Mahomed N.N., Charron K.D. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010. Vol. 468, N I. P. 57-63.
  202. Noble P.C., Conditt M.A., Cook K.F., Mathis K.B. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2006. Vol. 452. P. 35-43.
  203. Niki Y., Nagura T., Nagai K., Kobayashi S., Harato K. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reduces knee adduction moment more than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2018. Vol. 26, N 6. P. 1629-1635.
  204. Almaawi A.M., Hutt J.R.B., Masse V., Lavigne M., Vendittoli P-À. The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty//J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32. P. 2133-2140.
  205. McAlindon ÒÅ., Snow S., Cooper Ñ., Dieppe Ð.À. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint // Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1992. Vol. 51, N 7. P. 844-849.
  206. Ahlback S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation // Acta Radiol. Diagn. (Stockh.). 1968. Suppl. 277. P. 7-72.
  207. Ledingham J., Regan M., Jones A., Doherty M. Radiographic patterns and associations of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients referred to hospital // Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1993. Vol. 52, N 7. P. 520-526.
  208. Duncan R.C., Hay E.M., Saklatvala J., Croft P.R. Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis — it all depends on your point of view // Rheumatology. (Oxford). 2006. Vol. 45, N 6. P. 757-760.
  209. Johnson A.J., Howell S.M., Costa C.R., Mont M.A. The ACL in the arthritic knee: how often is it present and can preoperative tests predict its presence? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013. Vol. 471, N 1. P. 181-188.
  210. Duthon V.B., Barea C., Abrassart S., Fasel J.H., Fritschy D., Menetrey J. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2006. Vol. 14, N 3. P. 204-213.
  211. Bourne R.B., Chesworth Â.Ì., Davis À.Ì., Mahomed N.N., Charron K.D. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010. Vol. 468, N 1. P. 57-63.
  212. Liddle A.D., Judge A., Pandit H., Murray D.W. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales // Lancet. 2014. Vol. 384, N 9952. P. 1437-1445.
  213. Cobb J. Osteoarthritis of the knee. Precise diagnosis and treatment // BMJ. 2009. Vol. 339. P. b3747.
  214. Garner A., van Arkel R.J., Cobb J. Classification of combined partial knee arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2019. Vol. 101 -B, N 8. P. 922-928.
  215. Toliopoulos P., LeBlanc M.A., Hutt J., Lavigne M., Desmeules F., Vendittoli P.A. Anatomic versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision // Open Orthop. J. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 357—363.
  216. Thienpont E., Price A. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty of the patellofemoral and medial compartments // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013. Vol. 21, N 11. P. 2523-2531.
  217. Palumbo B.T., Henderson E.R., Edwards P.K., Burris R.B, Gutierrez S., Raterman S.J. Initial experience of the journey-deuce bicompartmental knee prosthesis: a review of 36 cases // J. Arthroplasty. 2011. Vol. 26, N 6. Suppl. P. 40—45.
  218. Wang FL, Dugan E., Frame J., Rolston L. Gait analysis after bi-compartmental knee replacement // Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 2009. Vol. 24, N 9. P. 751—754.
  219. Argenson J.N., Parratte S., Bertani A., Aubaniac J.M., Lombardi A.V. Jr, Berend K.R. et al. The new arthritic patient and arthroplasty treatment options // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009. Vol. 91, suppl. 5. P. 43-48.
  220. Lefer J., Scheys L., Plante-Bordeneuve T., Callewaert B., Labey L., Bellemans J. et al. Joint kinematics following bi-compartmental knee replacement during daily life motor tasks // Gait Posture. 2012. Vol. 36, N 3. P. 454—460.
  221. Parratte S., Ollivier M., Opsomer G., Lunebourg A., Argenson J.N., Thienpont E. Is knee function better with contemporary modular bicompartmental arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty? Short-term outcomes of a prospective matched study including 68 cases // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2015. Vol. 101, N 5. P. 547—552.
  222. Heyse T.J., Khefacha A., Cartier P. UKA in combination with PFR at average 12-year follow-up //Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2010. Vol. 130, N 10. P. 1227—1230.
  223. Cartier P., Sanouiller J.L., Grelsamer R. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. 2—12-year followup study //J. Arthroplasty. 1990. Vol. 5, N 1. P. 49—55.
  224. Biazzo A., Silvestrini F., Manzotti A., Confalonieri N. Bicompartmental (uni plus patellofemoral) versus total knee arthroplasty: a match-paired study // Musculoskelet. Surg. 2019. Vol. 103. P. 63-68.
  225. Tan S.M., Dutton A.Q., Bea K.C., Kumar V.P. Bicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for medial and patellofemoral osteoarthritis // J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong). 2013. Vol. 21, N 3. P. 281-284.
  226. Romagnoli S., Marullo M., Massaro M., Rustemi E., D’Amario E, Corbella M. Bi-unicompartmental and combined uni plus patellofemoral replacement: indications and surgical technique // Joints. 2015. Vol. 3, N 1. P. 42—48.
  227. Rolston L., Bresch J., Engh G., Franz A., KreuzerS., Nadaud M. et al. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients // Orthopedics. 2007. Vol. 30, N 8. Suppl. P. 70-73.
  228. Engh G.A. A bi-compartmental solution: what the deuce? // Orthopedics. 2007. Vol. 30, N 9. P. 770-771.
  229. Stuyts B., Vandenberghe M., Bracht H., Fortems Y, Van den Eeden E., Cuypers L. Fracture of the tibial baseplate in bicompartmental knee arthroplasty // Case Rep. Orthop. 2015. Vol. 2015. P. 1-5.
  230. Steinert A.F., Beckmann J., Holzapfel B.M., Rudert M., Arnholdt J. Bicompartmental individualized knee replacement: use of patient-specific implants and instruments (iDuo) // Open Orthop. Traumatol. 2017. Vol. 29, N 1. P. 51-58.
  231. Argenson J.N., Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac J.M. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplast ywith cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study //J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2002. Vol. 84, N 12. P. 2235-2239.
  232. Wunschel M., Lo J., Dilger T., Wulker N., Muller O. Influence of bi- and tri-compartmental knee arthroplasty on the kinematics of the knee joint //BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2011. Vol. 12. P. 29.
  233. Zanasi S. Innovations in total knee replacement: new trends in operative treatment and changes in peri-operative management// Eur. Orthop. Traumatol. 2011. Vol. 2, N 1—2. P. 21-31.
  234. Parratte S., Pauly V, Aubaniac J.M., Argenson J.N. Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010. Vol. 468, N 1. P. 64-72.
  235. Lonner J.H. Modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty with robotic arm assistance // Am. J. Orthop. (Belle Mead, NJ). 2009. Vol. 38, N 2. Suppl. P. 28-31.
  236. Confalonieri N., Manzotti A., Cerveri P., De Momi E. Bi-unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: a matched paired study with early clinical results // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2009. Vol. 129, N 9. P. 1157-1163.
  237. Pradhan N.R., Gambhir A., Porter M.L. Survivorship analysis of 3234 primary knee arthroplasties implanted over a 26-year period: a study of eight different implant designs // Knee. 2006. Vol. 13, N 1. P. 7-11.
  238. Shah S.M., Dutton A.Q., Liang S., Dasde S. Bicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for medio-patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a comparison of early clinical and functional outcomes // J. Knee Surg. 2013. Vol. 26, N 6. P. 411-416.
  239. Pritchett J.W. Anterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 1996. Vol. 11, N2. P. 194-197.
  240. Andriacchi T.P., Galante J.O., Fermier R.W. The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1982. Vol. 64, N 9. P. 1328-1335.
  241. Neogi T., Felson D., Niu J., Nevitt M., Lewis C.E., Aliabadi P. et al. Association between radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis and pain: results from two cohort studies// BMJ. 2009. Vol. 339. P. b2844.
  242. Felson D.T., Nevitt M.C., Yang M., Clancy M., Niu J., Torner J.C. et al. A new approach yields high rates of radiographic progression in knee osteoarthritis // J. Rheumatol. 2008. Vol. 35, N 10. P. 2047-2054.
  243. Pandit Í., Jenkins Ñ., Gill H.S., Barker Ê., Dodd Ñ.À., Murray D.W. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2011. Vol. 93, N 2. P. 198-204.
  244. Goodfellow J., O’Connor J., Pandit H., Dodd C.A., Murray D. Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford knee. 2nd ed. Oxford : Goodfellow, 2016. 288 p.
  245. Price A.J., Svard U. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011. Vol. 469, N 1. P. 174-179.
  246. Altuntas A.O., Alsop H., Cobb J.P. Early results of a domed tibia, mobile bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from an independent centre // Knee. 2013. Vol. 20, N 6. P. 466-470.
  247. Pandit H., Mancuso F, Jenkins C., Jackson W.F.M., Price A.J., Dodd C.A.F. et al. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2017. Vol. 25, N 3. P. 669-674.
  248. van der List J.P., Chawla H., Zuiderbaan H.A., Pearle A.D. Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2017. Vol. 25, N 8. P. 2622-2631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00167-015-3878-z
  249. Scindler O., Scott N. Basic kinematics and biomechanics of the PFJ // Acta Orthop. Belg. 2011. Vol. 77. P. 421-431.
  250. Bandi W. Chondromalacia patellae and arthritis of the patellofemoral joint // Helv. Chir. Acta. 1972. Vol. 11. P. 1-70.
  251. Walker P.S. Contact areas and load transmission in the knee // American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: Symposium on Reconstructive Surgery of the Knee. St Louis : Mosby, 1978. P. 26-36.
  252. Romagnoli S., Verde F., Zacchetti S. Bicompartmental prosthesis // Small Implants in Knee Reconstructions / eds N. Confalonieri, S. Romagnoli. Milan : Springer, 2013. P. 105-116.
  253. Csintalan R.P., Schulz M.M., Woo J., McMahon P.J., Lee T.Q. Gender differences in patellofemoral joint biomechanics // Clin. Orthop. 2002. Vol. 402. P. 260—269.
  254. Mahfouz M., Booth R. Jr, Argenson J., Merkl B.C., Abdel Fatah E.E., Kuhn M.J. Analysis of variation of adult femora using sex-specific statistical atlases // Presented at Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Conference. 2006.
  255. Varadarajan K.M., Gill T.J., Freiberg A.A., Rubash H.E., Li G. Gender differences in trochlear groove orientation and rotational kinematics of human knees // J. Orthop. Res. 2009. Vol. 27. P. 871-878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20844
  256. McAlindon T.E., Snow S., Cooper C., Dieppe P.A. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community // Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1992. Vol. 51. p. 844-849.
  257. Dejour D., Allain J. Histoire naturelle de 1’arthrose femoro-patellaire isolee // Rev. Chir. Orthop. 2004. Vol. 90. P. 1S69-1S129.
  258. Guilbert S., Gougeon F., Migaud H. Evolution de 1’arthrose femoro-patellaire isolee: devenir a 9 ans de recul moyen de 80 genoux non operes // Rev. Chir. Orthop. 2004. Vol. 90. P. 1S69-1S86.
  259. Romagnoli S., Marullo M. Mid-term clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of 105 gender-specific patellofemoral arthroplasties, with or without the Association of Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33. P. 688-695.
  260. Romagnoli S., Marullo M. What are the limits for unicompartimental knee arthroplasty? // The Young Arthritic Knee. Abstract book of 16emes Journ6es Lyonnaises de Chirurgie du Genou 2014 / eds M. Bonnin et al. Sauramps Medical, 2014.
  261. Leadbetter W.B., Ragland P.S., Mont M.A. The appropriate use of patellofemoral arthroplasty: an analysis of reported indications, contraindications, and failures // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005. Vol. 436. P. 91-99.
  262. Lonner J.H. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact of design on outcomes // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2008. Vol. 39. P. 347-354. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j. ocl.200802.002
  263. Lonner J.H., Bloomfield M.R. The clinical outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2013. Vol. 44. P. 271-280. DOI: https://doi.0rg/lO.lOl6/j. ocl.2013.03.002
  264. Carrillon Y., Abidi H., Dejour D. et al. Patellar instability: assessment on MR images by measuring the lateral trochlear inclination-initial experience // Radiology. 2000. Vol. 216. P. 582-585.
  265. Lustig S., Magnussen R.A., Dahm D.L., Parker D. Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today? // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2012. Vol. 20. P. 1216—1226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1948-z
  266. Dahm D.L., Kalisvaart M.M., Stuart M.J., Slettedahl S.W. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: outcomes and factors associated with early progression of tibiofemoral arthritis // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2014. Vol. 22, N 10. P. 2554—2559. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3202-3
  267. Murray D.W., Goodfellow J.W., O’Connor J.J. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1998. Vol. 80, N 6. P. 983-989.
  268. Capra S.W., Fehring T.K. Unicondylar arthroplasty. A survivorship analysis //J Arthroplasty. 1992. Vol. 7, N 3. P. 247-251.
  269. Berger R.A., NedeffD.D., Barden R.M., Sheinkop M.M., Jacobs J.J., Rosenberg A.G. et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1999. Vol. 367. P. 50-60.
  270. Scott R.D., Cobb A.G., McQueary F.G., Thornhill T.S. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 12-year follow-up evaluation with survivorship analysis // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1991. Vol. 271. P. 96-100.
  271. Peersman G., Stuyts B., Vandenlangenbergh T., Cartier P., Fennema P. Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2015. Vol. 23, N 11. P. 3296-3305.
  272. Ko Y.-B., Gujarathi M.R., Oh K.-J. Outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies between fixed and mobile bearings focusing on complications// Knee Surg. Relat. Res. 2015. Vol. 27, N 3. P. 141—148.
  273. Panni A.S., Vasso M., Cerciello S., Felici A. Unicompartmental knee replacement provides early clinical and functional improvement stabilizing over time // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2012. Vol. 20, N 3. P. 579—585.
  274. Foran J.R.H., Brown N.M., Valle Della C.J., Berger R.A., Galante J.O. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013. Vol. 471, N 1. P. 102-108.
  275. Nuno N., Ahmed A.M. Sagittal profile of the femoral condyles and its application to femorotibial contact analysis//J. Biomech. Eng. 2001. Vol. 123, N 1. P. 18—26.
  276. Zoghi M., Hefzy M.S., Fu K.C., Jackson W.T. A three-dimensional morphometrical study of the distal human femur// Proc. Inst. Meeh. Eng. H. 1992. Vol. 206, N 3. P. 147—157.
  277. Du P.Z., Markolf K.L., Levine B.D., McAllister D.R, Jones K.J. Differences in the radius of curvature between femoral condyles: implications for osteochondral allograft matching//J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2018. Vol. 100, N 15. P. 1326—1331.
  278. Carpenter D.P., Holmberg R.R., Quartulli M.J., Barnes C.L. Tibial plateau coverage in UKA: a comparison of patient specific and off-the-shelf implants // J. Arthroplasty. 2014. Vol. 29, N 9. P. 1694-1698.
  279. van der Merwe J., van den Heever D.J., Erasmus PJ. Estimating regions of interest on the distal femur// Med. Eng. Phys. 2018. Vol. 60. P. 23—29.
  280. Harrysson O.L.A., Hosni Y.A., Nayfeh J.F. Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study// BMC. Musculoskelet. Disord. 2007. Vol. 8. P. 91.
  281. Fitz W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with use of novel patient-specific resurfacing implants and personalized jigs // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009. Vol. 91, suppl. 1. P. 69-76.
  282. Parratte S., Argenson J.-N.A., Pearce O., Pauly V, Auquier P., Aubaniac J.-M. Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50s // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009. Vol. 91, N 3. P. 351-356.
  283. Liddle A.D., Pandit H., O’Brien S., Doran E., Penny I.D., Hooper G.J. et al. Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1000 knees//Bone Joint J. 2013. Vol. 95-B, N 2. P. 181-187.
  284. Pandit H., Liddle A.D., Kendrick B.J.L., JenkinsC., Price A.J., Gill H.Set al. Improved fixation in cementless unicompartmental knee replacement: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2013. Vol. 95, N 15. P. 1365-1372.
  285. Chatellard R., Sauleau V., Colmar M., Robert H., Raynaud G., Brilhault J. et al. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does tibial component position influence clinical outcomes and arthroplasty survival? // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2013. Vol. 99, N 4. Suppl. P. S219-S225.
  286. Bellemans J., Colyn W., Vandenneucker H., Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012. Vol. 470, N 1. P. 45-53.
  287. Eckhoff D.G., Bach J.M., Spitzer V.M., Reinig K.D., Bagur M.M., Baldini TH. et al. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005. Vol. 87, suppl. 2. P. 71—80.
  288. Mullaji A.B., Shah S., Shetty G.M. Mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores limb alignment comparable to that of the unaffected contralateral limb // Acta Orthop. 2017. Vol. 88, N 1. P. 70-74.
  289. Diezi C., Wirth S., Meyer D.C., Koch P.P. Effect of femoral to tibial varus mismatch on the contact area of unicondylar knee prostheses // Knee. 2010. Vol. 17, N 5. P. 350—355.
  290. Hirschmann M.T., Behrend H. Functional knee phenotypes: a call for a more personalised and individualized approach to total knee arthroplasty? // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2018. Vol. 26, N 10. P. 2873—2874.
  291. Kim M.-K. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty fails to completely restore normal gait patterns during level walking // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2018. Vol. 26, N 11. P. 3280-3289.
  292. Kozinn S.C., Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty //J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1989. Vol. 71, N 1. P. 145-150.
  293. Eriksson K., Sadr-Azodi O., Singh C., Osti L., Bartlett J. Stress radiography for osteoarthritis of the knee: a new technique // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2010. Vol. 18, N 10. P. 1356-1359.
  294. Bergeson A.G., Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V., Hurst J.M., Morris M.J., Sneller M.A. Medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early survivorship and analysis of failures in 1000 consecutive cases // J. Arthroplasty. 2013. Vol. 28, N 9. Suppl. P. 172-175.
  295. Saragaglia D., Bevand A., Refaie R. et al. Results with nine years mean follow up on one hundred and three KAPS uni knee arthroplasties: eighty six medial and seventeen lateral // Int. Orthop. 2018. Vol. 42, N 5. P. 1061 — 1066.
  296. Jones G.G., Kotti M., Wiik A.V, Collins R., Brevadt M.J., Strachan R.K. et al. Gait comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties with healthy controls // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B, N 10. Suppl. Â. P. 16-21.
  297. Leenders A.M. A high rate of tibial plateau fractures after early experience with patientspecific instrumentation for unicompartmental knee arthroplasties // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2018. Vol. 26, N 11. P. 3491—3498.
  298. Ollivier M., Parratte S., Lunebourg A., Viehweger E., Argenson J.-N. The John Insall Award: no functional benefit after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific instrumentation: a randomized trial // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2016. Vol. 474, N 1. P. 60-68.
  299. Alvand A., Khan T., Jenkins C., Rees J.L., Jackson W.F., Dodd C.A.F. et al. The impact of patient-specific instrumentation on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2018. Vol. 26, N 6. P. 1662-1670.
  300. Dao Trong M.L., Diezi C., Goerres G., Helmy N. Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting blocks // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2015. Vol. 23, N 7. P. 1993.
  301. Belzile E., Rivet-Sabourin G., Bedard M., Robichaud H., Angers M., Bedard M. Evaluation de la precision d’implantation d’une prothese unicompartimentale de genou utilisant un guide de coupe personnalise // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. I03S. P. S31.
  302. Vasso M., Antoniadis A., Helmy N. Update on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: current indications and failure modes // EFORT Open Rev. 2018. Vol. 3, N 8. P. 442— 448.
  303. Liddle A.D., Pandit H., Judge A., Murray D.W. Effect of surgical caseload on revision rate following total and unicompartmental knee replacement // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2016. Vol. 98, N 1. P. 1-8.
  304. Zambianchi F., Digennaro V, Giorgini A., Grandi G., Fiacchi E, Mugnai R. et al. Surgeon’s experience influences UKA survivorship: a comparative study between all-poly and metal back designs // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2015. Vol. 23, N 7. P. 2074-2080.
  305. Jones G.G., Logishetty K., Clarke S., Collins R., Jaere M., Harris S. et al. Do patientspecific instruments (PSI) for UKA allow non-expert surgeons to achieve the same saw cut accuracy as expert surgeons? // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2018. Vol. 138, N 11. P. 1601-1608.
  306. Schotanus M.G.M., Thijs E., Heijmans M., Vos R., Kort N.P. Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2018. Vol. 26, N 9. P. 2659—2668.
  307. Purcell R.L., Cody J.P., Ammeen D.J., Goyal N., Engh G.A. Elimination of preoperative flexion contracture as a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty//J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2018. Vol. 26, N 7. P. e 158—e 163.
  308. Wiik A.V., Manning V., Strachan R.K., Amis A.A., Cobb J.P. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty enables near normal gait at higher speeds, unlike total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2013. Vol. 28, N 9. Suppl. P. 176-178.
  309. Beard D.J., Pandit H., Gill H.S., Hollinghurst D., Dodd C.A., Murray D.W. The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement //J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2007. Vol. 89, N 12. P. 1597-1601.
  310. Confalonieri N., Manzotti A., Montironi E, Pullen C. Tissue sparing surgery in knee reconstruction: unicompartmental (UKA), patellofemoral (PFA), UKA + PFA, biunicompartmental (bi-UKA) arthroplasties //J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2008. Vol. 9, N 3. P. 171-177.
  311. Newman S.D.S., Altuntas A., Alsop H., Cobb J.P. Up to 10 year follow-up of the Oxford domed lateral partial knee replacement from an independent centre // Knee. 2017. Vol. 24, N 6. P. 1414-1421.
  312. Stukenborg-Colsman C., Wirth C.J., Lazovic D., Wefer A. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7—10-year follow-up prospective randomized study // Knee. 2001. Vol. 8, N 3. P. 187-194.
  313. Krych A.J., Reardon P., Sousa P., Pareek A., Stuart M., Pagnano M. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provides higher activity and durability than valgus-producing proximal tibial osteotomy at 5 to 7 years // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2017. Vol. 99, N 2. P. 113—122.
  314. Confalonieri N., Manzotti A., Cerveri P., De Momi E. Bi-unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: a matched paired study with early clinical results // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2009. Vol. 129, N 9. P. 1157-1163.
  315. Price A.J., Waite J.C., Svard U. Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005. Vol. 435. P. 171 — 180.
  316. Steele R.G., Hutabarat S., Evans R.L., Ackroyd C.E., Newman J.H. Survivorship of the St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental knee replacement beyond ten years // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2006. Vol. 88, N 9. P. 1164-1168.
  317. Liddle A.D., Pandit H., O’Brien S., Doran E., Penny I.D., Hooper G.J. et al. Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1000 knees // Bone Joint J. 2013. Vol. 95-B, N 2. P. 181 — 187.
  318. Boissonneault A., Pandit H., Pegg E., Jenkins C., Gill H.S., Dodd C.A. et al. No difference in survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without an intact anterior cruciate ligament // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013. Vol. 21, N 11. P. 2480-2486.
  319. Toliopoulos P., LeBlanc M.A., Hutt J., Lavigne M., Desmeules F., Vendittoli P.A. Anatomic versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision // Open Orthop. J. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 357-363.
  320. Liddle A.D., Judge A., Pandit H., Murray D.W. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales // Lancet. 2014. Vol. 384, N 9952. P. 1437-1445.
  321. Wiik A.V., Aqil A., Tankard S., Amis A.A., Cobb J.P. Downhill walking gait pattern discriminates between types of knee arthroplasty: improved physiological knee functionality in UKA versus TKA// Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2015. Vol. 23, N 6. P. 1748-1755.
  322. Deschamps G., Choi C. Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patient’s selection and operative technique // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2011. Vol. 97. P. 648-661.
  323. Collins Ì., Lavigne Ì., Girard J., Vendittoli Ð.À. Joint perception after hip or knee replacement surgery // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2012. Vol. 98. P. 275—280.
  324. Bourne R.B., Chesworth B.M., Davis A.M., Mahomed N.N., Charron K.D.J. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010. Vol. 468. P. 57—63.
  325. Nam D., Nunley R.M., Barrack R.L. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern? // Bone Joint J. 2014. Vol. 96-B. P. 96—100.
  326. Lingard E.A., Sledge C.B., Learmonth I.D.; Kinemax Outcomes Group. Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia// J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2006. Vol. 88. P. 1201 — 1207.
  327. McClelland J.A., Webster K.E., Feller J.A. Gait analysis of patients following total knee replacement: a systematic review // Knee. 2007. Vol. 14. P. 253—263.
  328. Vendittoli P.A., Blakeney W. Redefining knee replacement // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103. P. 977-979.
  329. Almaawi A.M., Hutt J.R.B., Masse V, Lavigne M., Vendittoli P.-À. The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32. P. 2133—2140.
  330. Blakeney W., Beaulieu Y, Puliero B., Kiss M.O., Vendittoli P.A. Bone resection for mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty creates frequent gap modifications and imbalances // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2020. Vol. 28, N 5. P. 1532— 1541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05562-8
  331. Blakeney W., Beaulieu Y, Kiss M.O., Riviere C., Vendittoli P.A. Less gap imbalance with restricted kinematic alignment than with mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: simulations on 3-D bone models created from CT-scans // Acta Orthop. 2019. Vol. 90, N 6. P. 602-609.
  332. Howell S.M., Howell S.J., Hull M.L. Assessment of the radii of the medial and lateral femoral condyles in varus and valgus knees with osteoarthritis // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010. Vol. 92. P. 98-104.
  333. Hutt J.R.B., LeBlanc M.A., Masse V, Lavigne M., Vendittoli P.A. Kinematic TKA using navigation: surgical technique and initial results // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2016. Vol. 102. P. 99-104.
  334. Riviere Ñ., Vigdorchik J.M., Vendittoli Ð.À. Mechanical alignment: the end of an era! // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2019. Vol. 105, N 7. P. 1223—1226. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.07.005
  335. Bellemans J., Colyn W, Vandenneucker H., Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012. Vol. 470. P. 45—53.
  336. Eckhoff D.G., Bach J.M., Spitzer V.M. et al. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005. Vol. 87, suppl. 2. P. 71-80.
  337. Ishikawa M., Kuriyama S., Ito H., Furu M., Nakamura S., Matsuda S. Kinematic alignment produces neamormal knee motion but increases contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: a case study on a single implant design // Knee. 2015. Vol. 22. P. 206-212.
  338. Li Z., Esposito C.I., Koch C.N., Lee Y.Y., Padgett D.E, Wright TM. Polyethylene damage increases with varus implant alignment in posterior-stabilized and constrained condylar knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2017. Vol. 475. P. 2981—2991.
  339. Srivastava A., Lee G.Y, Steklov N., Colwell C.W. Jr, Ezzet K.A., D’Lima D.D. Effect of tibial component varus on wear in total knee arthroplasty // Knee. 2012. Vol. 19. P. 560-563.
  340. Werner F.W., Ayers D.C., Maletsky L.P., Rullkoetter P.J. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements // J. Biomech. 2005. Vol. 38. P. 349-355.
  341. D’Lima D.D., Hermida J.C., Chen P.C., Colwell C.W. Polyethylene wear and variations in knee kinematics // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001. Vol. 392. P. 124—130.
  342. Teeter M.G., Naudie D.D., McCalden R.W. et al. Varus tibial alignment is associated with greater tibial baseplate migration at 10 years following total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2018. Vol. 26. P. 1610-1617.
  343. Alghamdi A., Rahme M., Lavigne M., Masse V., Vendittoli P.A. Tibia valga morphology in osteoarthritic knees: importance of preoperative full limb radiographs in total knee arthroplasty//J. Arthroplasty. 2014. Vol. 29. P. 1671—1676.
  344. Blakeney W, Clement J., Desmeules F, Hagemeister N., Riviere C., Vendittoli P.A. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019. Vol. 27, N 5. P. 1410-1417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5174-l
  345. Gu Y, Roth J.D., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. How frequently do four methods for mechanically aligning a total knee arthroplasty cause collateral ligament imbalance and change alignment from normal in white patients? AAOS exhibit selection // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2014. Vol. 96. P. elOl.
  346. Howell S.M., Papadopoulos S., Kuznik K., Ghaly L.R., Hull M.L. Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? // Int. Orthop. 2015. Vol. 39. P. 2117—2124.
  347. Laende E., Richardson G., Biddulph M., Dunbar M. Implant fixation and gait analysis at one year following total knee arthroplasty with patient specific cutting blocks versus computer navigation // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B. P. 136.
  348. Font-Rodriguez D.E., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1997. Vol. 345. P. 79—86.
  349. Gill G.S., Joshi A.B., Mills D.M. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1999. Vol. 367. P. 210—215.
  350. Rodricks D.J., Patil S., Pulido P., Colwell C.W. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007. Vol. 89. P. 89-95.
  351. Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2009. Vol. 24. P. 560—569.
  352. Blakeney W.G., Khan R.J.K., Palmer J.L. Functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised trial comparing computer-assisted surgery with conventional techniques// Knee. 2014. Vol. 21. P. 364—368.
  353. Longstaff L.M., Sloan K., Stamp N., ScaddanM., Beaver R. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function // J. Arthroplasty. 2009. Vol. 24. P. 570-578.
  354. Berend M.E., Ritter M.A., Meding J.B. et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004. Vol. 428. P. 26—34.
  355. Fang D.M., Ritter M.A., Davis K.E. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? // J. Arthroplasty. 2009. Vol. 24. P. 39—43.
  356. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1991. Vol. 73. P. 709—714.
  357. Abdel M.P., Ollivier M., Parratte S., Trousdale R.T., Berry D.J., Pagnano M.W. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on survival and functional outcomes of modern total knee arthroplasties with cement: a concise follow-up at 20 years // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2018. Vol. 100. P. 472-478.
  358. Parratte S., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., Berry D.J. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010. Vol. 92. P. 2143—2149.
  359. Morgan S.S., Bonshahi A., Pradhan N., Gregory A., Gambhir A., Porter M.L. The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty // Int. Orthop. 2008. Vol. 32. P. 639—642.
  360. Bonner T.J., Eardley W.G.P., Patterson P., Gregg P.J. The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2011. Vol. 93. P. 1217—1222.
  361. Victor J.M., Bassens D., Bellemans J., Gursu S., Dhollander A.A., Verdonk P.C. Constitutional varus does not affect joint line orientation in the coronal plane // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014. Vol. 472. P. 98-104.
  362. Hutt J., Masse V, Lavigne M., Vendittoli P.-À. Functional joint line obliquity after kinematic total knee arthroplasty // Int. Orthop. 2016. Vol. 40. P. 29—34.
  363. Abdel M.P., Oussedik S., Parratte S., Lustig S., Haddad F.S. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction // Bone Joint J. 2014. Vol. 96-B. P. 857-862.
  364. Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Kinematically aligned TKA with MRI-based cutting guides // Improving Accuracy in Knee Arthroplasty / ed. E. Thienpont. New Delhi : Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P), 2012. P. 207—232.
  365. Eckhoff D.G. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005. Vol. 87, suppl. 2. P. 71.
  366. Iranpour F., Merican A.M., Dandachli W. et al. The geometry of the trochlear groove // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010. Vol. 468, N 3. P. 782-788.
  367. Yin L., Chen Ê., Guo L. et al. Identifying the functional flexion-extension axis of the knee: an in-vivo kinematics study // PLoS One. 2015. Vol. 10, N 6. Article ID e0128877.
  368. Riviere C., Iranpour E, Auvinet E. et al. Alignment options for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 7. P. 1047—1056.
  369. Nam D., Nunley R.M., Barrack R.L. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern? // Bone Joint J. 2014. Vol. 96-B, N 11. Supple. A. P. 96—100.
  370. Meehan J.P., Danielsen B., Kim S.H. et al. Younger age is associated with a higher risk of early periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty// J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2014. Vol. 96, N 7. P. 529—535.
  371. Price A.J., Alvand A., Troelsen A., Katz J.N., Hooper G., Gray A. et al. Knee replacement// Lancet. 2018. Vol. 392, N 10 158. P. 1672-1682.
  372. Le D.H., Goodman S.B., Maloney W.J., Huddleston J.I. Current modes of failure in TKA: infection, instability, and stiffness predominate // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014. Vol. 472, N 7. P. 2197-2200.
  373. Song S.J., Detch R.C., Maloney W. J., Goodman S.B., Huddleston J.I. Causes of instability after total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2014. Vol. 29, N 2. P. 360—364.
  374. Riviere C., Iranpour E, Auvinet E. et al. Mechanical alignment technique for TKA: are there intrinsic technical limitations? // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 7. P. 1057-1067.
  375. Gu Y, Roth J.D., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. How frequently do four methods for mechanically aligning a total knee arthroplasty cause collateral ligament imbalance and change alignment from normal in white patients? // J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2014. Vol. 96, N 12. P. elOl—ell9.
  376. Barrack R.L., Schrader T., Bertot A.J. et al. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty// Clin. Orthop. 2001. Vol. 392. P. 46—55.
  377. Bellemans J., Colyn W., Vandenneucker H. et al. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012. Vol. 470, N 1. P. 45-53.
  378. Roth J.D., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Native knee laxities at 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion and their relationship to the goal of the gap-balancing alignment method of total knee arthroplasty // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2015. Vol. 97, N 20. P. 1678—1684.
  379. Stoddard J.E., Deehan D.J., Bull A. MJ. et al. No difference in patellar tracking between symmetrical and asymmetrical femoral component designs in TKA // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2014. Vol. 22, N 3. P. 534—542.
  380. McClelland J.A., Webster K.E., Feller J.A. et al. Knee kinematics during walking at different speeds in people who have undergone total knee replacement // Knee. 2011. Vol. 18, N 3. P. 151-155.
  381. Fitzpatrick C.K., Rullkoetter P.J. Influence of patellofemoral articular geometry and material on mechanics of the unresurfaced patella // J. Biomech. 2012. Vol. 45, N 11. P. 1909-1915.
  382. Eckhoff D.G., Jacofsky D.J., Springer B.D. et al. Bilateral symmetrical comparison of femoral and tibial anatomic features//J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N 5. P. 1083—1090.
  383. Deep K. Collateral ligament laxity in knees: what is normal? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014. Vol. 472, N 11. P. 3426-3431.
  384. Bonner T.J., Eardley W.G.P., Patterson P. et al. The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2011. Vol. 93, N 9. P. 1217-1222.
  385. Abdel Ì.Ð., Ollivier Ì., Parratte S. et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on survival and functional outcomes of modern total knee arthroplasties with cement: a concise follow-up at 20 years // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2018. Vol. 100, N 6. P. 472—478.
  386. Deep K., Eachempati K.K., Apsingi S. The dynamic nature of alignment and variations in normal knees // Bone Joint J. 2015. Vol. 97-B, N 4. P. 498—502.
  387. Riviere C., Ollivier M., Girerd D. et al. Does standing limb alignment after total knee arthroplasty predict dynamic alignment and knee loading during gait? // Knee. 2017. Vol. 24, N 3. P. 627-633.
  388. Nagura T., Niki Y., Harato K. et al. Analysis of the factors that correlate with increased knee adduction moment during gait in the early postoperative period following total knee arthroplasty// Knee. 2017. Vol. 24, N 2. P. 250-257.
  389. Kutzner 1., Trepczynski A., Heller M.O. et al. Knee adduction moment and medial contact force — facts about their correlation during gait // PLoS One. 2013. Vol. 8, N 12. Article ID e81036.
  390. Nakano N., Matsumoto T., Muratsu H. et al. Postoperative knee flexion angle is affected by lateral laxity in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty //J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N2. P. 401-405.
  391. Takahashi T., Ansari J., Pandit H. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty or mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty // J. Knee Surg. 2018. Vol. 31, N 10. P. 999-1006.
  392. Shelton T., Howell S., Hull M. A total knee arthroplasty is stiffer when the intraoperative tibial force is greater than the native knee //J. Knee Surg. 2019. Vol. 32. P. 1008—1014.
  393. Shelton T.J., Nedopil A.J., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. Do varus or valgus outliers have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments than those which are in-range after a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Limb and joint line alignment after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 10. P. 1319—1328.
  394. Niki Y., Nagura T., Nagai K. et al. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reduces knee adduction moment more than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2018. Vol. 26, N 6. P. 1629—1635.
  395. Blakeney W., Clement J., Desmeules F. et al. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019. Vol. 27. P. 1410-1417.
  396. Keshmiri A., Maderbacher G., Baier C. et al. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty leads to a better restoration of patellar kinematics compared to mechanic alignment // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019. Vol. 27. P. 1529—1534.
  397. Koh I.J., Park I.J., Lin C.C. et al. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces native patellofemoral biomechanics during deep knee flexion // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019. Vol. 27. P. 1520—1528.
  398. Howell S.M., Shelton T.J., Hull M.L. Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33. P. 3678-3684.
  399. Nedopil A.J., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. What clinical characteristics and radiographic parameters are associated with patellofemoral instability after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? // Int. Orthop. 2017. Vol. 41, N 2. P. 283—291.
  400. Hutt J.R.B., LeBlanc M.-A., Masse V. et al. Kinematic TKA using navigation: surgical technique and initial results// Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2016. Vol. 102, N 1. P. 99—104.
  401. Almaawi A.M., Hutt J.R.B., Masse V. et al. The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty //J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 7. P. 2133-2140.
  402. Young S.W., Walker M.L., Bayan A. et al. The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: no difference in 2-year functional outcomes using kinematic versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled clinical trial // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2017. Vol. 475, NLP. 9-20.
  403. Waterson H.B., Clement N.D., Eyres K.S. et al. The early outcome of kinematic versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised control trial // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B, N 10. P. 1360-1368.
  404. Calliess T., Bauer K., Stukenborg-Colsman C. et al. PSI kinematic versus non-PSl mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2017. Vol. 25, N 6. P. 1743—1748.
  405. Dossett H.G., Estrada N.A., Swartz GJ. et al. A randomized controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results// Bone Joint J. 2014. Vol. 96-B, N 7. P. 907-913.
  406. Niki Y., Kobayashi S., Nagura T. et al. Joint line modification in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty improves functional activity but not patient satisfaction // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 7. P. 2125-2130.
  407. Fitch D.A., Sedacki K., Yang Y. Mid- to long-term outcomes of a medial-pivot system for primary total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Bone Joint Res. 2014. Vol. 3, N 10. P. 297-304.
  408. Howell S.M., Papadopoulos S., Kuznik K.T. et al. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013. Vol. 21, N 10. P. 2271—2280.
  409. Nedopil A.J., Singh A.K., Howell S.M. et al. Does calipered kinematically aligned TKA restore native left to right symmetry of the lower limb and improve function? // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 2. P. 398-406.
  410. Calliess T., Karkosh R., Windhagen H. et al. Concept of a femur-first-extension-gap-balancer for optimized manual kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Poster ESSKA Academy, 2018.
  411. Hutt J., Masse V, Lavigne M. et al. Functional joint line obliquity after kinematic total knee arthroplasty// Int. Orthop. 2016. Vol. 40, N 1. P. 29—34.
  412. Riviere C., Iranpour E, Harris S. et al. The kinematic alignment technique for TKA reliably aligns the femoral component with the cylindrical axis // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 7. P. 1069-1073.
  413. Nedopil A.J., Howell S.M., Rudert M. et al. How frequent is rotational mismatch within 0°±10° in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? // Orthopedics. 2013. Vol. 36, N 12. P. el515—el520.
  414. Riviere C., Dhaif E, Shah H. et al. Kinematic alignment of current TKA implants does not restore the native trochlear anatomy // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2018. Vol. 104, N 7. P. 983-995.
  415. Riviere C., Iranpour E, Harris S. et al. Differences in trochlear parameters between native and prosthetic kinematically or mechanically aligned knees // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2018. Vol. 104, N 2. P. 165-170.
  416. Dossett H.G., Swartz G.J., Estrada N.A. et al. Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty // Orthopedics. 2012. Vol. 35. P. e 160—e 169.
  417. Riviere C., Lazic S., Villet L. et al. Kinematic alignment technique for total hip and knee arthroplasty: the personalized implant positioning surgery // EFFORT Open Rev. 2018.Vol. 3, N 3. P. 98-105.
  418. Ng Ñ.Ê., Chen J.Y, Yeh J.Z.Y. et al. Distal femoral rotation correlates with proximal tibial joint line obliquity: a consideration for kinematic total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 6. P. 1936-1944.
  419. Brar A.S., Howell S.M., Hull M.L. What are the bias, imprecision, and limits of agreement for finding the flexion—extension plane of the knee with five tibial reference lines? // Knee. 2016. Vol. 23, N 3. P. 406-411.
  420. Nam D., Lin K.M., Howell S.M. et al. Femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0° and 90° in the osteoarthritic knee treated with total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2014. Vol. 22, N 12. P. 2975—2981.
  421. Matsumoto T., Takayama K., Ishida K. et al. Radiological and clinical comparison of kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 5. P. 640-646.
  422. Dossett H.G., Swartz GJ., Estrada N.A. et al. Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty // Orthopedics. 2012. Vol. 35, N 2. P. e 160—e 169.
  423. Woon J.T.K., Zeng I.S.L., Calliess T. et al. Outcome of kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a meta-anal-ysis and subgroup analysis of randomised trials // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2018. Vol. 138, N9. P. 1293-1303.
  424. Courtney P.M., Lee G.-C. Early outcomes of kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of the literature // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 6. P. 2028—2032.el.
  425. McNair P.J., Boocock M.G., Dominick N.D. et al. A comparison of walking gait following mechanical and kinematic alignment in total knee joint replacement // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 2. P. 560—564.
  426. Ji H.-Ì., Han J., Jin D.S., Seo H., Won Y.-Y. Kinematically aligned TKA can align knee joint line to horizontal // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2016. Vol. 24, N 8. P. 2436-2441.
  427. Lozano R., Campanelli V, Howell S., Hull M. Kinematic alignment more closely restores the groove location and the sulcus angle of the native trochlea than mechanical alignment: implications for prosthetic design // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019.Vol. 27. P. 1504-1513.
  428. Maillot C., Riviere C., Ciara H. Poor relationship between frontal tibiofemoral and trochlear anatomic parameters: implications for designing new knee implants for kinematic alignment // Knee. 2019. Vol. 26. P. 106—114.
  429. Zuppinger Í. Die aktive flexion im unbelasteten Kniegelenk: Ziiricher Habil Schr. Wiesbaden : Bergmann, 1904. S. 703—763.
  430. Brantigan O.C., Voshell A.F. The mechanics of the ligaments and menisci of the knee joint // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1941. Vol. 23. P. 44.
  431. Iwaki H., Pinskerova V., Freeman M.A.R. Tibio-femoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee //J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2000. Vol. 82, N 8. P. 1189-1195.
  432. Martelli S., Pinskerova V. The shapes of the tibial femoral articular surfaces in relation to tibiofemoral movement // J. Bone J. Surg. Br. 2002. Vol. 84. P. 607-613.
  433. McPherson A., Karrholm J., Pinskerova V., Sosna A., Martelli S. Imaging knee position using MRI, RSA/CT and 3D digitization // J. Biomech. 2005. Vol. 38, N 2. P. 263-268.
  434. Gardiner J.C., Weiss J.A., Rosenberg T.D. Strain in the human medial collateral ligament during valgus loading of the knee // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001. Vol. 391. P. 266-274.
  435. Johal P., Williams A., Wragg P., Gedroyc W., Hunt M. Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. An in-vivo study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using «interventional» MRI //J. Biomech. 2005. Vol. 38, N 2. P. 269—276.
  436. Kurosawa H., Walker P.S., Abe S., Garg A., Hunter T. Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design // J. Biomech. 1985. Vol. 18, N 7. P. 487-499.
  437. Hill P.F., Vedi V., Iwaki H., Pinskerova V., Freeman M.A.R., Williams A. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2000. Vol. 82, N 8. P. 1196-1198.
  438. Pinskerova V., Samuelson K.M., Stammers J., Maruthainar K., Sosna A., Freeman M.A.R. The knee in full flexion an anatomical study // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009. Vol. 91, N6. P. 830-834.
  439. Tokuhara Y., Kadoya Y., Nakagawa S., Kobayashi A., Takaoka K. The flexion gap in normal knees: an MRI study // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004. Vol. 86. P. 1133—1136.
  440. Dargel J., Joern W.P.M., Feiser J., Ivo R., Koebke J. Human knee joint anatomy revisited: morphometry in the light of sex-specific total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2011. Vol. 26, N 3. P. 346-353.
  441. Guy S.P., Famdon M.A., Sidhom S., Al-Lami M., Bennett C., London N.J. Gender differences in distal femoral morphology and the role of gender specific implants in total knee replacement: a prospective clinical study // Knee. 2012. Vol. 19, N 1. P. 28-31.
  442. Koninckx A., Deltour A., Thienpont E. Femoral sizing in total knee arthroplasty is rotation dependent // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2014. Vol. 22, N 12. P. 2941-2946.
  443. Bellemans J., Carpentier K., Vandenneucker H., Vanlauwe J., Victor J. The John Insall Award. Both morphotype and gender influence the shape of the knee in patients undergoing TKA // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010. Vol. 468. P. 29—36.
  444. Lancaster B.J.A., Cottam H.L., Pinskerova V., Eldridge J.D.J., Freeman M.A.R. Variation in the of the tibial plateau. A possible factor in the development of anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2008. Vol. 90, N 3. P. 330-333.
  445. Nunley R.M., Nam D., Johnson S.R., Barnes C.L. Extreme variability in posterior slope of the proximal tibia: measurements on 2395 CT scans of patients undergoing UKA//J. Arthroplasty. 2014. Vol. 29. P. 1677-1680.
  446. Eckhoff D.G., Brown A.W., Licoyne R.F., Stamm E.R. Knee version associated with anterior knee pain // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1997. Vol. 339. P. 152—155.
  447. Insall J.N., Binazzi R., Soudry M. et al. Total knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1985. Vol. 192. P. 13-12.
  448. Bellemans J. Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: opposes // Orthopedics. 2011. Vol. 34. P. e507-e509.
  449. Baier C., Benditz A., Koeck F., Keshmiri A., Grifka J., Maderbacher G. Different kinematics of knees with varus and valgus deformities // J. Knee Surg. 2018. Vol. 31, N 3. P. 264-269.
  450. Blakeney W., Clement J., Desmeules F., Hagemeister N., Riviere C., Vendittoli P.A. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019. Vol. 27, N 5. P. 1410-1417.
  451. Pritchett J.W. Patient preferences in knee prostheses // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004. Vol. 86, N 7. P. 979-982.
  452. Okada Y., Teramoto A., Takagi T. et al. ACL function in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty// J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2018. Vol. 100. P. el 14.
  453. Chang C.W., Lai K.A., Yang C.Y. et al. Early mechanical complications of a multidirectional mobile-bearing total knee replacement // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2011. Vol. 93, N 4. P. 479-483.
  454. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., Compere C.L., Zimmerman J.R. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1978. Vol. 60, N 2. P. 217.
  455. Weber M., Lechler P., von Kunow F., Vollner F., Keshmiri A., Hapfelmeier A. et al. The validity of a novel radiological method for measuring femoral stem version on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip after total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2015. Vol. 97-B, N 3. P. 306.
  456. Woerner M.L., Weber M., Craiovan B.S., Springorum H.R., Grifka J., Renkawitz T.F. Radiographic assessment of femoral stem torsion in total hip arthroplasty — a comparison of a caput-collum-diaphyseal angle-based technique with the budin view//J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N 5. P. 1117.
  457. Pulos N., Tiberi lii J.V. 3rd, Schmalzried T.P. Measuring acetabular component position on lateral radiographs — ischio-lateral method // Bull. N.Y.U. Hosp. Jt Dis. 2011. Vol. 69, suppl. 1. P. S84.
  458. Abdel M.P., von Roth P., Jennings M.T., Hanssen A.D., Pagnano M.W. What safe zone? The vast majority of dislocated THAs are within the Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular component position// Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2016. Vol. 474, N 2. P. 386.
  459. Buckland A.J., Puvanesarajah V., Vigdorchik J., Schwarzkopf R., Jain A., Klineberg E.O. et al. Dislocation of a primary total hip arthroplasty is more common in patients with a lumbar spinal fusion // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 5. P. 585.
  460. DelSole E.M., Vigdorchik J.M., Schwarzkopf R., Errico T.J., Buckland A.J. Total hip arthroplasty in the spinal deformity population: does degree of sagittal deformity affect rates of safe zone placement, instability, or revision? // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 6. P. 1910.
  461. Fujita K., Kabata T., Maeda T., Kajino Y., Iwai S., Kuroda K. et al. The use of the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip replacement: an analysis of the orientation of the trial acetabular component using a navigation system // Bone Joint J. 2014. Vol. 96-B, N 3. P. 306.
  462. Kanawade V., Dorr L.D., Wan Z. Predictability of acetabular component angular change with postural shift from standing to sitting position //J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2014. Vol. 96, N 12. P. 978.
  463. Stell M., Lundergan W., Heckmann N., McKnight B., Ike H., Murgai R. et al. Spinopelvic mobility and acetabular component position for total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 1 Suppl. A. P. 37.
  464. Esposito C.I., Carroll K.M., Sculco P.K., Padgett D.E., Jerabek S.A., Mayman DJ. Total hip arthroplasty patients with fixed spinopelvic alignment are at higher risk of hip dislocation // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 5. P. 1449.
  465. Pierrepont J.S.C., Miles B., O’Connor P., Ellis A., Molnar R., Bare J. et al. Patientspecific component alignment in total hip arthroplasty // Reconstr. Rev. 2016. Vol. 6, N4. P. 27.
  466. Lembeck B., Mueller O., Reize P., Wuelker N. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate // Acta Orthop. 2005. Vol. 76, N 4. P. 517.
  467. Zheng G. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP X-ray radiograph // Med. Phys. 2010.Vol. 37, N4. P. 1424.
  468. Zheng G., Nolte L.P., Ferguson S.J. Scaled, patient-specific 3D vertebral model reconstruction based on 2-D lateral fluoroscopy // Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2011.Vol. 6, N3. P. 351.
  469. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., Compere C.L., Zimmerman J.R. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1978. Vol. 60, N2. P. 217-220.
  470. Murray D.W. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation //J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1993. Vol. 75. P. 228-232.
  471. DiGioia A.M., Jaramaz B., Blackwell M., Simon D.A., Morgan F., Moody J.E. et al. The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998. Vol. 355. P. 8—22.
  472. Lazennec J.Y., Chariot N., Gorin M., Roger B., Arafati N., Bissery A. et al. Hip-spine relationship: a radioanatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning // Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2004. Vol. 26, N 2. P. 136-144.
  473. Philippot R., Wegrzyn J., Farizon F., Fessy M.H. Pelvic balance in sagittal and Lewinnek reference planes in the standing, supine and sitting positions // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2009. Vol. 95, N 1. P. 70—76.
  474. Legaye J., Duval-Beaupere G., Hecquet J., Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves // Eur. Spine J. 1998. Vol. 7, N2. P. 99-103.
  475. Kanawade V., Dorr L.D., Wan Z. Predictability of acetabular component angular change with postural shift from standing to sitting position // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2014. Vol. 96, N 12. P. 978-986.
  476. Phan D., Bederman S.S., Schwarzkopf R. The influence of sagittal spinal deformity on anteversion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2015. Vol. 97-B, N 8. P. 1017-1023.
  477. Larkin B., van Holsbeeck M., Koueiter D., Zaltz I. What is the impingement-free range of motion of the asymptomatic hip in young adult males? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2015. Vol. 473, N 4. P. 1284-1288.
  478. Sugano N., Tsuda K., Miki H., Òàêî M., Suzuki N., Nakamura N. Dynamic measurements of hip movement in deep bending activities after total hip arthroplasty using a 4-dimensional motion analysis system // J. Arthroplasty. 2012. Vol. 27. P. 1562-1568.
  479. Stefl M., Lundergan W., Heckmann N., McKnight B., Ike H., Murgai R. et al. Spinopelvic mobility and acetabular component position for total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 1. Suppl. A. P. 37—45.
  480. Dorr L.D., Malik A., Dastane M., Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009. Vol. 467, N 1. P. 119—127.
  481. Dorr L.D., Wan Z. Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement //Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998. Vol. 355. P. 144—151.
  482. Sadhu A., Nam D., Coobs B., Barrack T.N., Nunley R.M., Barrack R.L. Acetabular component position and the risk of dislocation following primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a matched cohort analysis // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32. P. 987—991.
  483. Buckland A.J., Hart R.A., Mundis G.M. Jr et al. Risk of total hip arthroplasty dislocation after adult spinal deformity correction // Spine J. 2016. Vol. 16, N 10. P. S180. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.07.086
  484. Brown T.D., Elkins J.M., Pedersen D.R., Callaghan J.J. Impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty: mechanisms and consequences // Iowa Orthop. J. 2014. Vol. 34. P. 1-15.
  485. Grammatopoulos G., Pandit H., Kwon Y.M., Gundle R., McLardy-Smith P., Beard D.J. et al. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009. Vol. 91, N 8. P. 1019—1024.
  486. Pierrepont J., Hawdon G., Miles B.P., Connor B.O., Bare J., Walter L.R. et al. Variation in functional pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 2. P. 184-191.
  487. Yukizawa Y., Dorr L.D., Ward J.A., Wan Z. Posterior mini-incision with primary total hip arthroplasty: a nine to ten year follow up study // J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N 1. P. 168-167.
  488. Heckmann N., Stefl M., Trasolini N., McKnight B., Ike H., Dorr L.D. Late dislocation following total hip arthroplasty // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2018. Vol. 100. P. 1845-1853.
  489. Callanan M.C., Jarrett B., Bragdon C.R., Zurakowski D., Rubash H.E., Freiberg A.A. et al. The John Chamley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011. Vol. 469, N2. P. 319-329.
  490. Ike Í., Dorr L.D., Trasolini N., Stefl M., McKnight Â., Heckmann N. Spine-pelvis-hip relationship in THR functioning of a total hip replacement // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2018. Vol. 100. P. 1606-1615.
  491. Tezuka T., Heckmann N., Bodner R., Dorr L.D. Functional safe zone is superior to the Lewinnek safe zone for total hip arthroplasty: why the Lewinnek safe zone is not always predictive of stability // J. Arthroplasty. 2019. Vol. 34. P. 3—8.
  492. Dorr L.D., Callaghan J.J. Death of the Lewinnek «safe zone» // J. Arthroplasty. 2019. Vol. 34. P. 1-2.
  493. Riviere Ñ., Lazennec J.-Y., Van Der Straeten C., Auvinet E., Cobb J., Muirhead-Allwood S. The influence of spine-hip relations on total hip replacement: a systematic review// Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 4. P. 559—568.
  494. Sultan A.A., Khlopas A., Piuzzi N.S., Chughtai M., Sodhi N., Mont M.A. The impact of spino-pelvic alignment on total hip arthroplasty outcomes: a critical analysis of current evidence // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 5. P. 1606—1616.
  495. Phan D., Bederman S.S., Schwarzkopf R. The influence of sagittal spinal deformity on anteversion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2015. Vol. 97-B, N 8. P. 1017-1023.
  496. Lum Z.C., Coury J.G., Cohen J.L., Dorr L.D. The current knowledge on spinopelvic mobility //J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 1. P. 291—296.
  497. Riviere Ñ., Lazic S., Villet L., Wiart Y., Allwood S.M., Cobb J. Kinematic alignment technique for total hip and knee arthroplasty: the personalized implant positioning surgery // EFORT Open Rev. 2018. Vol. 3, N 3. P. 98—105.
  498. Riviere C. Kinematic versus conventional alignment techniques fortotal hip arthroplasty: a retrospective case control study // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2019. Vol. 105, N 5. P. 895-905.
  499. Maillot C., Harman C., Villet L., Cobb J., Riviere C. Modem cup alignment techniques in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2019. Vol. 105, N5. P. 907-913.
  500. Bayliss L.E., Culliford D., Monk A.P., Glyn-Jones S., Prieto-Alhambra D., Judge A. et al. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study // Lancet. 2017. Vol. 389, N 10 077. P. 1424-1430.
  501. Stell M., Lundergan W., Heckmann N., McKnight B., Ike H., Murgai R. et al. Spinopelvic mobility and acetabular component position for total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 1. Suppl. A. p. 37-45.
  502. Spencer-Gardner L., Pierrepont J., Topham M., Bare J., McMahon S., Shimmin A.J. Patient-specific instrumentation improves the accuracy of acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B, N 10. P. 1342-1346.
  503. Riviere C., Lazic S., Dagneaux L., Van Der Straeten C., Cobb J., Muirhead-Allwood S. Spine—hip relations in patients with hip osteoarthritis // EFORT Open Rev. 2018. Vol. 3, N 2. P. 39-44.
  504. Lazennec J.Y., Thauront F., Robbins C.B., Pour A.E. Acetabular and femoral anteversions in standing position are outside the proposed safe zone after total hip arthroplasty //J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 11. P. 3550—3556.
  505. Dorr L.D., Malik A., Dastane M., Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. 2009. Vol. 467, N 1. P. 119—127.
  506. Hua X., Li J., Jin Z., Fisher J. The contact mechanics and occurrence of edge loading in modular metal-on-polyethylene total hip replacement during daily activities // Med. Eng. Phys. 2016. Vol. 38, N 6. P. 518-525.
  507. Marchetti E., Krantz N., Berton C., Bocquet D., Fouilleron N., Migaud H. et al. Component impingement in total hip arthroplasty: frequency and risk factors. A continuous retrieval analysis series of 416 cup // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2011. Vol. 97, N2. P. 127-133.
  508. Shoji T., Yamasaki T., Izumi S., Kenji M., Sawa M., Yasunaga Y et al. The effect of cup medicalization and lateralization on hip range of motion in total hip arthroplasty //Clin. Biomech. 2018. Vol. 57. P. 121-128.
  509. McCarthy T.F., Alipit V., Nevelos J., Elmallah R.K., Mont M.A. Acetabular cup anteversion and inclination in hip range of motion to impingement // J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N9. P. 264-268.
  510. Malkani A.L., Ong K.L., Lau E., Kurtz S.M., Justice B.J., Manley M.T. Early- and late-term dislocation risk after primary hip arthroplasty in the medicare population // J. Arthroplasty. 2010. Vol. 25, N 6. P. 21-25.
  511. Parratte S., Ollivier Ì., Lunebourg A., FlecherX., Argenson J.N. No benefit after THA performed with computer-assisted cup placement: 10-year results of a randomized controlled study // Clin. Orthop. 2016. Vol. 474. P. 2085—2093.
  512. Abdel M.P., von Roth P., Jennings M.T., Hanssen A.D., Pagnano M.W. What safe zone? The vast majority of dislocated THAs are within the Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular component position // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2016. Vol. 474, N 2. P. 386-391.
  513. Esposito C.I., Gladnick B.P., Lee Y., Lyman S., Wright T.M., Mayman D.J. et al. Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2015. Vol. 30, N 1. P. 109-113.
  514. Reina N., Putman S., Desmarchelier R., Sari Ali E., Chiron P., Ollivier M. et al. Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek’s safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls //Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 5. P. 657—661.
  515. Archbold H.A.P, Mockford B., Molloy D., McConway J., Ogonda L., Beverland D. The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement // J. Bone Joint Surg. 2006. Vol. 88, N 7. P. 4.
  516. Girard J., Lons A., Ramdane N., Putman S. Hip resurfacing before 50 years of age: a prospective study of 979 hips with a mean follow-up of 5.1 years // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2018. Vol. 104, N 3. P. 295-299.
  517. Hill J.C., Archbold H.A., Diamond O.J., Orr J.F., Jaramaz B., Beverland D.E. Using a calliper to restore the centre of the femoral head during total hip replacement //J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2012. Vol. 94, N 11. P. 1468-1474.
  518. Girard J., Lons A., Ramdane N., Putman S. Hip resurfacing before 50 years of age: a prospective study of979 hips with a mean follow-up of 5.1 years // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2018. Vol. 104, N 3. P. 295-299.
  519. Shin Y.-S., Suh D.-H., Park J.-H., Kim J.-L., Han S.-B. Comparison of specific femoral short stems and conventional-length stems in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty// Orthopedics. 2016. Vol. 39, N 2. P. e311—e317.
  520. Nam D., Riegler V., Clohisy J.C., Nunley R.M., Barrack R.L. The impact of total hip arthroplasty on pelvic motion and functional component position is highly variable // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 4. P. 1200—1205.
  521. Mellon S.J., Grammatopoulos G., Andersen M.S., Pandit H.G., Gill H.S., Murray D.W. Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty // J. Biomech. 2015. Vol. 48, N 2. P. 318-323.
  522. Patel A.B., Wagle R.R., Usrey M.M., Thompson M.T., Incavo S.J., Noble P.C. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty//J. Arthroplasty. 2010. Vol. 25, N 8. P. 1275—1281. el.
  523. Takao M., Nishii T., Sakai T., Sugano N. Postoperative limb-offset discrepancy notably affects soft-tissue tension in total hip arthroplasty // J. Bone Joint Surg. 2016. Vol. 98, N 18. P. 1548-1554.
  524. Pierrepont J.W., Feyen H., Miles B.P., Young D.A., Bare J.V., Shimmin A.J. Functional orientation of the acetabular component in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty and its relevance to squeaking // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B, N 7. P. 910-916.
  525. Bedard N.A., Martin C.T., Slaven S.E., Pugely A.J., Mendoza-Lattes S.A., Callaghan J .J. Abnormally high dislocation rates of total hip arthroplasty after spinal deformity surgery//J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N 12. P. 2884—2885.
  526. DelSole E.M., Vigdorchik J.M., Schwarzkopf R., Errico T.J., Buckland AJ. Total hip arthroplasty in the spinal deformity population: does degree of sagittal deformity affect rates of safe zone placement, instability, or revision? // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 6. P. 1910-1917.
  527. Dagneaux L., Marouby S., Maillot C., Canovas F., Riviere C. Dual mobility device reduces the risk of prosthetic hip instability for patients with degenerated spine: a casecontrol study // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2019. Vol. 105, N 3. P. 461—466.
  528. Esposito Ñ.1., Carroll K.M., Sculco P.K., Padgett D.E., Jerabek S.A., Mayman D.J. Total hip arthroplasty patients with fixed spinopelvic alignment are at higher risk of hip dislocation //J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 5. P. 1449—1454.
  529. Fessy M.H., Putman S., Viste A., Isida R., Ramdane N., Ferreira A. et al. What are the risk factors for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty? A multicenter case-control study of 128 unstable and 438 stable hips // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 5. P. 663-668.
  530. Bonnin M.P., Archbold P.H.A., Basiglini L., Fessy M.H., Beverland D.E. Do we medialise the hip centre of rotation in total hip arthroplasty? Influence of acetabular offset and surgical technique // Hip Int. 2012. Vol. 22, N 4. P. 371—378.
  531. Grammatopoulos G., Alvand A., Monk A.P., Mellon S., Pandit H., Rees J. et al. Surgeons’ accuracy in achieving their desired acetabular component orientation // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2016. Vol. 98, N 17. P. e72.
  532. Pierrepont J.W., Feyen H., Miles B.P., Young D.A., Bare J.V., Shimmin A.J. Functional orientation of the acetabular component in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty and its relevance to squeaking // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B, N 7. P. 910-916.
  533. Merle C., Grammatopoulos G., Waldstein W., Pegg E., Pandit H., Aldinger P.R. et al. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis //J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2013. Vol. 95, N 22. P. el72.
  534. Thelen T., Thelen P., Demezon H., Aunoble S., Le Huec J.-C. Normative 3D acetabular orientation measurements by the low-dose EOS imaging system in 102 asymptomatic subjects in standing position: analyses by side, gender, pelvic incidence and reproducibility// Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 2. P. 209-215.
  535. Uemura Ê., Takao M., Otake Y., Koyama K., Yokota F., Hamada H. et al. Can anatomic measurements of stem anteversion angle be considered as the functional anteversion angle? // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 2. P. 595—600.
  536. Riviere C., Hardijzer A., Lazennec J.-Y., Beaule P., Muirhead-Allwood S., Cobb J. Spine-hip relations add understandings to the pathophysiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 4. P. 549-557.
  537. Mayeda B.F., Haw J.G., Battenberg À.Ê., Schmalzried Ò.Ð. Femoral-acetabular mating: the effect of femoral and combined anteversion on cross-linked polyethylene wear//J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N IO. P. 3320-3324. URL: https://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883540318305539
  538. Miyoshi H., Mikami H., Oba K., Amari R. Anteversion of the acetabular component aligned with the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty //J. Arthroplasty. 2012. Vol. 27, N6. P. 916-922.
  539. Piazzolla A., Solarino G., Bizzoca D., Montemurro V., Beijano P., Lamartina C. et al. Spinopelvic parameter changes and low back pain improvement due to femoral neck anteversion in patients with severe unilateral primary hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip replacement// Eur. Spine J. 2018. Vol. 27, N 1. P. 125—134.
  540. Shah S.M., Munir S., Waiter W.L. Changes in spinopelvic indices after hip arthroplasty and its influence on acetabular component orientation // J. Orthop. 2017. Vol. 14, N 4. P. 434-437.
  541. Berliner J.L., Esposito Ñ.1., Miller T.T., Padgett D.E., Mayman D.J., Jerabek S.A. What preoperative factors predict postoperative sitting pelvic position one year following total hip arthroplasty? // Bone Joint J. 2018. Vol. 100B, N 10. P. 1289—1296.
  542. Zahn R.K., Grotjohann S., Pumberger M., Ramm H., Zachow S., Putzier M. et al. Influence of pelvic tilt on functional acetabular orientation // Technol. Health. Care. 2017. Vol. 25, N 3. P. 557-565.
  543. Ezquerra L., Quilez M.P., Perez M.A., Albareda J., Serai B. Range of movement for impingement and dislocation avoidance in total hip replacement predicted by finite element model//.!. Med. Biol. Eng. 2017. Vol. 37, N 1. P. 26—34.
  544. McCarthy T.F., Nevelos J., Elmallah R.K., Chughtai M., Khlopas A., Alipit V. et al. The effect of pelvic tilt and femoral head size on hip range-of-motion to impingement //J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 11. P. 3544-3549.
  545. Ohmori T., Kabata T., Maeda T., Kajino Y., Taga T., Hasegawa K. et al. Increase in safe zone area of the acetabular cup using dual mobility cups in THA // Hip Int. 2017. Vol. 27, N 4. P. 361-367.
  546. Philippot R., Wegrzyn J., Farizon F. Pelvic balance in sagittal and Lewinnek reference planes in the standing, supine and sitting positions [Etude de I’equilibre sagittal pelvien et du plan de Lewinnek en orthostatisme, clinostatisme et position assise] // Orthop. TraumatoL Surg. Res. 2009. Vol. 95, N 1. P. 70—76.
  547. Ochi H., Homma Y., Baba T., Nojiri H., Matsumoto M., Kaneko K. Sagittal spinopelvic alignment predicts hip function after total hip arthroplasty // Gait Posture. 2017. Vol. 52. P. 293-300.
  548. Maratt J.D., Esposito C.I., McLawhorn A.S., Jerabek S.A., Padgett D.E., Mayman D.J. Pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: when does it matter? // J. Arthroplasty. 2015. Vol. 30, N 3. P. 387—391.
  549. Le Huec J.C., Hasegawa K. Normative values for the spine shape parameters using 3D standing analysis from a database of 268 asymptomatic Caucasian and Japanese subjects//Eur. Spine J. 2016. Vol. 25, N 11. P. 3630-3637.
  550. Hill J.C., Archbold H.A.P., Diamond O.J., Orr J.F., Jaramaz B., Beverland D.E. Using a calliper to restore the centre of the femoral head during total hip replacement // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2012. Vol. 94, N 11. P. 1468-1474.
  551. Meftah Ì., Yadav A., Wong À.Ñ., Ranawat A.S., Ranawat C.S. A novel method for accurate and reproducible functional cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2013. Vol. 28, N 7. P. 1200—1205.
  552. Ranawat C.S., Ranawat A.S., Lipman J.D., White P.B., Meftah M. Effect of spinal deformity on pelvic orientation from standing to sitting position // J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N 6. P. 1222-1227.
  553. Deep Ê., Shankar S., Mahendra A. Computer assisted navigation in total knee and hip arthroplasty// SICOT J. 2017.Vol. 3. P. 50. DOI: http://www.sicot-j.org/10.1051/ sicotj/2017034
  554. Steppacher S.D., Kowal J.H., Murphy S.B. Improving cup positioning using a mechanical navigation instrument // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011. Vol. 469, N 2. P. 423-428.
  555. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., Compere C.L., Zimmerman J.R. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1978. Vol. 60, N 2. P. 217—220. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/641088
  556. Lang J.E., Mannava S., Floyd A.J., Goddard M.S., Smith B.P., Mofidi A. et al. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2011. Vol. 93, N 10. P. 1296—1299. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21969424
  557. Liu Z., Gao Y., Cai L. Imageless navigation versus traditional method in total hip arthroplasty: a metaanalysis // Int. J. Surg. 2015. Vol. 21. P. 122-127. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.707
  558. Keshmiri A., Schroter C., Weber M., Craiovan B., Grifka J., Renkawitz T. No difference in clinical outcome, bone density and polyethylene wear 5—7 years after standard navigated vs. conventional cement-free total hip arthroplasty // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2015. Vol. 135, N 5. P. 723-730.
  559. Waddell B.S., Carroll K., Jerabek S. Technology in arthroplasty: are we improving value? // Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 2017. Vol. 10, N 3. P. 378—387.
  560. Inaba Y., Kobayashi N., Ike H., Kubota S., Saito T. The current status and future prospects of computer-assisted hip surgery // J. Orthop. Sci. 2016. Vol. 21, N 2. P. 107-115. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.jos.2015.10.023
  561. Jacofsky D.J., Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review // J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31. P. 2353-2363.
  562. Dungy D.S., Netravali N.A. Active robotics for total hip arthroplasty // Am. J. Orthop. 2016. Vol. 45, N 4. P. 256-259.
  563. Chen X., Xiong J., Wang P., Zhu S., Qi W., Peng H. et al. Robotic-assisted compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis // Postgrad. Med. J. 2018. Vol. 2. P. 335-341.
  564. Abdel M.P., von Roth P., Jennings M.T., Hanssen A.D., Pagnano M.W. What safe zone? The vast majority of dislocated THAs are within the Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular component position // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2016. Vol. 474, N 2. P. 386-391.
  565. Tezuka T., Heckmann N.D., Bodner R.J., Dorr L.D. Functional safe zone is superior to the Lewinnek safe zone for total hip arthroplasty: why the Lewinnek safe zone is not always predictive of stability // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 34, N 1. P. 3-8. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.034
  566. Reina N., Putman S., Desmarchelier R., Sari Ali E., Chiron P., Ollivier M. et al. Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek’s safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 5. P. 657—661.
  567. DiGioia A.M., Jaramaz B., Colgan B.D. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Image guided and robotic assistive technologies // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998. Vol. 354. P. 8-16.
  568. Merle Ñ., Waldstein W., Pegg Å., Streit M.R., Gotterbarm Ò., Aldinger P.R. et al. Femoral offset is underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis but accurately assessed on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2012. Vol. 94. P. 477-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B4.28067
  569. Khanuja H.S., Vakil J.J., Goddard M.S., Mont M.A. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011. Vol. 93. P. 500—509. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00774
  570. Dorr L.D., Malik A., Dastane M., Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009. Vol. 467. P. 119-127. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s 11999-008-0598-4
  571. Dimitriou D., Tsai T.-Y., Kwon Y.-M. The effect of femoral neck osteotomy on femoral component position of a primary cementless total hip arthroplasty // Int. Orthop. 2015. Vol. 39. P. 2315-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2739-l
  572. Henckel J., Holme T.J., Skinner J.A., Hart A.J. 3D-printed patient-specific guides for hip arthroplasty // J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2018. Vol. 26. P. e342—e348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00719
  573. Pierrepont J., Stambouzou C., Miles B., O’Connor P., Ellis A., Molnar R. et al. Patient-specific component alignment in total hip arthroplasty// Reconstr. Rev. 2016. Vol. 6. P. 27-33. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.15438/rr.6.4.148
  574. Ito H., Tanaka S., Tanaka T., Oshima H., Tanaka S. A patient-specific instrument for femoral stem placement during total hip arthroplasty // Orthopedics. 2017. Vol. 40. P. e374-e377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20161108-06
  575. Schneider A.K., Pierrepont J.W., Hawdon G., McMahon S. Clinical accuracy of a patient-specific femoral osteotomy guide in minimally-invasive posterior hip arthroplasty //Hip Int. 2018. Vol. 28. P. 636-641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018755691
  576. Huppertz A., Lembcke A., Sariali E.H., Durmus T., Schwenke C., Hamm B. et al. Low dose computed tomography for 3D planning of total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of radiation exposure and image quality // J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2015. Vol. 39. P. 649-656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000271
  577. Schauer D.A., Linton O.W. Ionizing radiation exposure oh the population of the United States// Med. Phys. 2009. Vol. 36. P. 5375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/L3245881
  578. Yang L., Zheng Z., Chen W., Wang J., Zhang Y. Femoral neck osteotomy guide for total hip arthroplasty // BMC Surg. 2015. Vol. 15. P. 1—6. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1186/s 12893-015-0015-3
  579. Pierrepont J., Riddell W., Miles B., Bare J., Shimmin A. Clinical accuracy of a patientspecific guide for delivering a planned femoral neck osteotomy // Orthop. Proc. 2016. Vol. 98-B. p. 131.
  580. Bare J., Selim J., Stambouzou C., Pierrepont J., McMahon S., Shimmin A. Clinical accuracy of a patient specific femoral neck osteotomy guide. Liverpool : Br. Orthop. Assoc. Ann. Congr., 2016.
  581. Reitman R., Pierrepont J., Shimmin A., McMahon S., Kerzhner E. Accurate reproduction of femoral Centre of rotation using 3d templating and a PSI guide // Orthop. Proc. 2017. Vol. 99. P. 109.
  582. Pierrepont J., Miles Â., Walter L., Marel E., McMahon S., Solomon M. et al. Sizing accuracy of the trinity 3D planning software for total hip replacement conclusions. Paris : Int. Congr. Jt Reconstr., 2015.
  583. Flecher X., Ollivier M., Argenson J.N. Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty// Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2016. Vol. 102. P. S9-S20. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.11.001
  584. Hofmann A.A., Skrzynski M.C. Leg-length inequality and nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty: a lawyer awaits // Orthopedics. 2000. Vol. 23. P. 943-944.
  585. Konyves A., Bannister G.C. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty// J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2005. Vol. 87. P. 155—157. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1302/0301 -620X.87B2.14878
  586. Woolson S.T., Hartford J.M., Sawyer A. Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement //J. Arthroplasty. 1999. Vol. 14. P. 159-164.
  587. Renkawitz T., Weber T., Dullien S., Woerner M., Dendorfer S., Grifka J. et al. Gait & posture leg length and offset differences above 5-mm after total hip arthroplasty are associated with altered gait kinematics// Gait Posture. 2016. Vol. 49. P. 196—201. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.07.011
  588. Sykes A., Hill J., Orr J., Humphreys P., Rooney A., Morrow E. et al. Patients’ perception of leg length discrepancy post total hip arthroplasty // Hip Int. 2015. Vol. 25. P. 452—456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000276
  589. Mahmood S.S., Mukka S.S., Crnalic S., Sayed-Noor A.S. The influence of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty on function and quality of life: a prospective cohort study // J. Arthroplasty. 2015. Vol. 30. P. 1638—1642. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.012
  590. Li J., McWilliams A.B., Jin Z., Fisher J., Stone M.H., Redmond A.C. et al. Unilateral total hip replacement patients with symptomatic leg length inequality have abnormal hip biomechanics during walking // Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 2015. Vol. 30, N 513—519. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.014
  591. Sariali E., Klouche S., Mouttet A., Pascal-Moussellard H. The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty // Acta Orthop. 2014. Vol. 85. P. 123-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.889980
  592. Clement N.D., S Patrick-Patel R., MacDonald D., Breusch S.J. Total hip replacement: increasing femoral offset improves functional outcome // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2016.Vol. 136. P. 1317-1323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2527-4
  593. Al-Amiry B., Mahmood S., Krupic F. Leg lengthening and femoral-offset reduction after total hip arthroplasty: where is the problem — stem or cup positioning? // Acta Radiol. 2017. Vol. 58. P. 1125-1131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185116684676
  594. Mahmood S.S., Mukka S.S., Crnalic S., Sayed-Noor A.S. Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength a prospective cohort study of 222 patients // Acta Orthop. 2016. Vol. 87. P. 36-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1091955
  595. Srinivasan A., Jung Å., Levine B.R. Modularity of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty //J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2012. Vol. 20, N 4. P. 214—222.
  596. Traina F., De Clerico M., Biondi F., Pilla F., Tassinari E., Toni A. Sex differences in hip morphology: is stem modularity effective for total hip replacement? // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009. Vol. 91, suppl. 6. P. 121 — 128.
  597. Matsushita A., Nakashima Y., Fujii M., Sato T., Iwamoto Y. Modular necks improve the range of hip motion in cases with excessively anteverted or retroverted femurs in THA//Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010. Vol. 468, N 12. P. 3342-3347.
  598. Massin P., Geais L., Astoin E., Simondi M., Lavaste F. The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems: a frontal plane radiographic study of the proximal femur//J. Arthroplasty. 2000. Vol. 15, N 1. P. 93—101.
  599. Montalti M., Castagnini F., Giardina F., Tassinari E., Biondi F., Toni A. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in Crowe III and IV dysplasia: high hip center and modular necks//.1. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 6. P. 1813-1819.
  600. Archibeck M.J., Cummins T., Carothers J., Junick D.W., White R.E. Jr. A comparison of two implant systems in restoration of hip geometry in arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011. Vol. 469, N 2. P. 443-446.
  601. Duwelius P.J., Burkhart B., Carnahan C., Branam G., Ko L.M., Wu Y. et al. Modular versus nonmodular neck femoral implants in primary total hip arthroplasty: which is better? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014. Vol. 472, N 4. P. 1240-1245.
  602. Registro dell’implantologia protesica ortopedica RIPO. URL: https://ripo.cineca.it/ (date of access May 25, 2018)
  603. Graves S.E., de Steiger R., Davidson D., Donnelly W., Rainbird S., Lorimer M.F. et al. The use of femoral stems with exchangeable necks in primary total hip arthroplasty increases the rate of revision // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 6. P. 766—773.
  604. De Martino L, Assini J.B., Elpers M.E., Wright T.M., Westrich G.H. Corrosion and fretting of a modular hip system: a retrieval analysis of 60 rejuvenate stems // J. Arthroplasty. 2015. Vol. 30, N 8. P. 1470-1475.
  605. Nawabi D.H., Do H.T., Ruel A., Lurie B., Elpers M.E., Wright T. et al. Comprehensive analysis of a recalled modular total hip system and recommendations for management // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2016. Vol. 98, N 1. P. 40—47.
  606. Kwon Y.M., Fehring T.K., Lombardi A.V., Barnes C.L., Cabanela M.E., Jacobs J.J. Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with dual modular taper total hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Hip Society // J. Arthroplasty. 2014. Vol. 29, N 11. P. 2060-2064.
  607. Êîð A.M., Keogh C., Swarts E. Proximal component modularity inTHA — at what cost? An implant retrieval study // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012. Vol. 470, N 7. P. 1885— 1894.
  608. Fokter S.K., Rudolf R., Molinik A. Titanium alloy femoral neck fracture — clinical and metallurgical analysis in 6 cases // Acta Orthop. 2016. Vol. 87, N 2. P. 197—202.
  609. Kretzer J.P., Jakubowitz E., Krachler M., Thomsen M., Heisel C. Metal release and corrosion effects of modular neck total hip arthroplasty // Int. Orthop. 2009. Vol. 33, N 6. P. 1531-1536.
  610. Morlock Ì. Modularity in orthopaedics // J. Trauma Orthopaed. 2017. Vol. 5, N 3. P. 60-63.
  611. Wight C.M., banting B., Schemitsch E.H. Evidence-based recommendations for reducing head-neck taper connection fretting corrosion in hip replacement prostheses// Hip Int. 2017. Vol. 27, N 6. P. 523-531.
  612. Hoberg M., Konrads C., Huber S., Reppenhagen S., Walcher M., Steinert A. et al. Outcome of a modular head-neck adapter system in revision hip arthroplasty // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2015. Vol. 135, N 10. P. 1469—1474.
  613. Ollivier M., Parratte S., Galland A., Lunebourg A., Flecher X., Argenson J.N. Titanium-titanium modular neck for primary TH A. Result of a prospective series of 170 cemented THA with a minimum follow-up of 5 years // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2015. Vol. 101, N2. P. 137-142.
  614. Lombardi A.V. Jr, Skeels M.D., Berend K.R., Adams J.Â., Franchi O.J. Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011. Vol. 469. P. 1547-1553.
  615. Stroh D.A., Issa K., Johnson A.J., Delanois R.E., Mont M.A. Reduced dislocation rates and excellent functional outcomes with large-diameter femoral heads // J. Arthroplasty. 2013. Vol. 28. P. 1415-1420.
  616. Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. et al. The frank Stinchfield award: dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012. Vol. 470. P. 351—356.
  617. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual report. Adelaide : AOA, 2017. URL: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2017 (date of access October 10, 2017)
  618. Malkani A.L., Ong K.L., Lau E., Kurtz S.M., Justice B.J., Manley M.T. Early- and late-term dislocation risk after primary hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population // J. Arthroplasty. 2010. Vol. 25. P. 21—25.
  619. Peters C.L., McPherson E., Jackson J.D., Erickson J.A. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2007. Vol. 22. P. 140—144.
  620. Burroughs B.R., Hallstrom B., Golladay G.J., Hoeffel D., Harris W.H. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes // J. Arthroplasty. 2005. Vol. 20. P. 11 — 19.
  621. Elkins J.M., O’Brien M.K., Stroud N.J., Pedersen D.R., Callaghan J.J., Brown T.D. Hard-on-hard total hip impingement causes extreme contact stress concentrations // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011. Vol. 469. P. 454—463.
  622. Seifert C.F., Noble P.C., Brown T.D. et al. Experimental and computational simulation of total hip arthroplasty dislocation // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2001. Vol. 32. P. 553-567, vii.
  623. Cinotti G., Lucioli N., Malagoli A., Calderoli C., Cassese F. Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning? // Int. Orthop. 2011. Vol. 35. P. 317—323.
  624. Malkani A.L., Garber A.T., Ong K.L. et al. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with previous lumbar fusion surgery: are there more dislocations and revisions? // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 4. P. 1189-1193.
  625. Sing D.C., Barry J.J., Aguilar T.U. et al. Prior lumbar spinal arthrodesis increases risk of prosthetic-related complication in total hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31. P. 227—232.eL
  626. Sariali E., Lazennec J.Y., Khiami F., Catonne Y. Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: in 'uence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter//Acta Orthop. 2009. Vol. 80. P. 277—282.
  627. Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., Ochoa J.A., Haas B.D., Hammill C. In vivo comparison of hip separation after metal-on-metal or metal-on- polyethylene total hip arthroplasty//J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2002. Vol. 84. P. 1836-1841.
  628. Glaser D., Komistek R.D., Cates H.E., Mahfouz M.R. Clicking and squeaking: in vivo correlation of sound and separation for different bearing surfaces // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2008. Vol. 90, suppl. 4. P. 112-120.
  629. Bouffard V., Nantel J., Therrien M., Vendittoli P.A., Lavigne M., Prince F. Center of mass compensation during gait in hip arthroplasty patients: comparison between large diameter head total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing // Rehabil. Res. Pract. 2011. Vol. 2011. Article ID 586412.
  630. Nantel J., Termoz N., Ganapathi M., Vendittoli P.A., Lavigne M., Prince F. Postural balance during quiet standing in patients with total hip arthroplasty with large diameter femoral head and surface replacement arthroplasty // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2009. Vol. 90. P. 1607-1612.
  631. Nantel J., Termoz N., Vendittoli P.A., Lavigne M., Prince F. Gait patterns after total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2009.Vol. 90. P. 463-469.
  632. Lavigne M., Ganapathi M., Mottard S., Girard J., Vendittoli P.A. Range of motion of large head total hip arthroplasty is greater than 28 mm total hip arthroplasty or hip resurfacing // Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 2011. Vol. 26. P. 267—273.
  633. Gromov K., Troelsen A., Otte K.S., Orsnes T., Ladelund S., Husted H. Removal of restrictions following primary THA with posterolateral approach does not increase the risk of early dislocation // Acta Orthop. 2015. Vol. 86. P. 463—468.
  634. Blakeney W.G., Beaulieu Y, Puliero B. et al. Excellent results of large-diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2018. Vol. loo-â. P. 1434-1441.
  635. Garbuz D.S., Tanzer M., Greidanus N.V., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. The John Chamley award: metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010.Vol. 468. P. 318-325.
  636. Deny A., Barry J., Hutt J.R.B., Lavigne M., Masse V., Vendittoli P.A. Effect of sleeved ceramic femoral heads on titanium ion release // Hip Int. 2018. Vol. 28, N 2. P. 139-144.
  637. Hallab N.J., Messina C., Skipor A., Jacobs J.J. Differences in the fretting corrosion of metal-metal and ceramic-metal modular junctions of total hip replacements // J. Orthop. Res. 2004. Vol. 22. P. 250-259.
  638. McDonnell S.M., Boyce G., Bare J., Young D., Shimmin A.J. The incidence of noise generation arising from the large-diameter Delta motion ceramic total hip bearing // Bone Joint J. 2013. Vol. 95-B. P. 160-165.
  639. Goldhofer M.I., Munir S., Levy Y.D., Walter W.K., Zicat B., Walter W.L. Increase in benign squeaking rate at five-year follow-up: results of a large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in total hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 4. P. 1210-1214.
  640. Tai S.M., Munir S., Walter W.L., Pearce S.J., Walter W.K., Zicat B.A. Squeaking in large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty //J. Arthroplasty. 2015. Vol. 30. P. 282-285.
  641. Fessy M. La double mobilite // Maitrise Orthopedique. 2006. Vol. 152. URL: http://www.maitrise-orthopedique.com/articles/la-double-mobilite-86
  642. Guyen O., Pibarot V., Vaz G., Chevillotte C., Bejui-Hugues J. Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009. Vol. 467. P. 465-472.
  643. Grazioli A., Ek Å.Ò., Rudiger Í.À. Biomechanical concept and clinical outcome of dual mobility cups // Int. Orthop. 2012. Vol. 36. P. 2411—2418.
  644. Guyen O., Chen Q.S., Bejui-Hugues J., Berry D.J., An K.N. Unconstrained tripolar hip implants: effect on hip stability // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007. Vol. 455. P. 202-208.
  645. Stroh A., Naziri Q., Johnson A.J., Mont M.A. Dualmobility bearings: a review of the literature // Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 2012. Vol. 9. P. 23—31.
  646. Epinette J.A. Clinical outcomes, survivorship and adverse events with mobile-bearings versus fixed-bearings in hip arthroplasty — a prospective comparative cohort study of 143 ADM versus 130 trident cups at 2 to 6-year follow-up // J. Arthroplasty. 2015. Vol. 30. P. 241-248.
  647. Epinette J.A., Beracassat R., Tracol P., Pagazani G., Vandenbussche E. Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients? // J. Arthroplasty. 2014. Vol. 29. P. 1323—1328.
  648. Blakeney W.G., Epinette J.A., Vendittoli P.A. Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: should everyone get one? // EFORT Open Rev. 2019. Vol. 4, N 9. P. 541—547.
  649. Epinette J.A., Lafuma A., Robert J., Doz M. Cost-effectiveness model comparing dual-mobility to fixed-bearing designs for total hip replacement in France // Orthop. TraumatoL Surg. Res. 2016. Vol. 102. P. 143-148.
  650. Argenson J., Ryembault Å., Flecher X., Brassart N., Parratte S., Aubaniac J. Three-dimensional anatomy of the hip in osteoarthritis after developmental dysplasia // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2005. Vol. 87, N 9. P. 1192-1196.
  651. Husmann O., Rubin P., Leyvraz P., de Roguin B., Argenson J. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur // J. Arthroplasty. 1997. Vol. 12. P. 444—450.
  652. Schmidutz F., Graf T., Mazoochian F., Fottner A., Bauer-Melnyk A., Jansson V. Migration analysis of a metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip prosthesis // Acta Orthop. 2012. Vol. 83, N4. P. 360-365.
  653. Sariali E., Mouttet A., Pasquier G., Durante E. Three dimensional hip anatomy in osteoarthritis. Analysis of the femoral off-set // J. Arthroplasty. 2009. Vol. 24, N 6. P. 990-997.
  654. Asayama I., Chamnongkich S., Simpson K., Kinsey T., Mahoney O. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2005. Vol. 20. P. 414—420.
  655. Sariali E., Klouche S., Mamoudy P. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: is squeaking related to an inaccurate three-dimensional hip anatomy reconstruction? // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2012. Vol. 100, N 4. P. 437—440.
  656. Sariali E., Klouche S., Mouttet A., Pascal-Moussellard H. The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty // Acta Orthop. 2014. Vol. 85, N 2. P. 123-127.
  657. Kwon Y.M., Khormaee S., Liow M.H., Tsai T.Y., Freiberg A.A., Rubash H.E. Asymptomatic pseudotumors in patients with taper corrosion of a dual-taper modular femoral stem: MARS-MR1 and metal ion study // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2016. Vol. 98, N 20. P. 1735-1740.
  658. Flecher X., Pearce O., Parratte S., Aubaniac J., Argenson J. Custom cementless stem improves hip function in young patients at 15-year follow-up // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010. Vol. 468, N 3. P. 747-755.
  659. Dessyn E., Flecher X., Parratte S., Ollivier M., Argenson J.N. A 20-year followup evaluation of total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 using a custom cementless stem // Hip Int. 2019. Vol. 29, N 5. P. 481—488.
  660. Sariali E., Catonne Y., Pascal-Moussellard H. Three-dimensional planning-guided total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive direct anterior approach. Clinical outcomes at five years’ follow-up // Int. Orthop. 2017. Vol. 41, N 4. P. 699-705.
  661. Huppertz A., Lembcke A., Sariali E., Durmus T., Schwenke C., Hamm B. et al. Low dose computed tomography for 3D planning of total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of radiation exposure and image quality // J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2015. Vol. 39, N 5. P. 649-656.
  662. Sariali E., Mouttet A., PasquierG., Durante E., Catonne Y. Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerized three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular-neck stem // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009. Vol. 91, N 3. P. 333— 340.
  663. Sariali E., Klouche S., Mamoudy P. Investigation into three dimensional hip anatomy in anterior dislocation after THA. Influence of the position of the hip rotation centre // Clin. Biomech. 2012. Vol. 27, N 6. P. 562-567.
  664. Krishnan S., Carrington R., Mohiyaddin S., Garlick N. Common misconceptions of normal hip joint relations on pelvic radiographs // J. Arthroplasty. 2006. Vol. 21. P. 409-412.
  665. Falez F., Casella F., Papalia M. Current concepts, classification, and results in short stem hip arthroplasty // Orthopedics. 2015. Vol. 38, N 3. Suppl. P. S6—S13.
  666. Rajakulendran K., Field R.E. Neck-preserving femoral stems // HSS J. 2012. Vol. 8, N 3. P. 295-303.
  667. Tran P., Zhang B.X., Lade J.A., Pianta R.M., Unni R.P., Haw C.S. Periprosthetic bone remodeling after novel shortstem neck-sparing total hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2016.Vol. 31,N 11. P. 2530-2535.
  668. Burchard R., Braas S., Soost C., Graw J.A., Schmitt J. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions — a comparing finite elements analysis // BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2017.Vol. 18, N 1. P. 343.
  669. Hauer G., Vielgut 1., Amerstorfer F., Maurer-Ertl W., Leithner A., Sadoghi P. Survival rate of short-stem hip prostheses: a comparative analysis of clinical studies and national arthroplasty registers // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 6. P. 1800—1805.
  670. Molfetta L., Capozzi M., Caldo D. Medium term follow up of the biodynamic neck sparing prosthesis// Hip Int. 2011. Vol. 21, N 1. P. 76—80.
  671. Giardina F., Castagnini F., Stea S., Bordini B., Montalti M., Toni A. Short stems versus conventional stems in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a long-term registry study//J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 6. P. 1794-1799.
  672. De Smet Ê., Van Der Straeten C., Van Orsouw M., Doubi R., Backers K., Grammatopoulos G. Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2011. Vol. 42, N 2. P. 259—269.
  673. Lavigne M., Masse V., Girard J., Roy A.G., Vendittoli P.A. Return to sport after hip resurfacing or total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study // Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice Appar. Mot. 2008. Vol. 94, N 4. P. 361—367.
  674. Van Der Straeten C., Van Quickenborne D., De Roest B., Calistri A., Victor J., De Smet K. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham hip resurfacings decline significantly at ten years // Bone Joint J. 2013. Vol. 95-B, N 10. P. 1332—1338.
  675. Kendal A.R., Prieto-Alhambra D., Arden N.K., Carr A., Judge A. Mortality rates at 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with total hip replacement in England: retrospective cohort analysis of hospital episode statistics // BMJ. 2013. Vol. 347. P. f6549.
  676. Swedish Register.
  677. Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. URL: https:/1 aoanj rr. sahmri .com/ fr/annual- reports- 2016
  678. 2016 National Joint Register of England and Wales. URL: http://www.njrcentre.org. uk/njrcentre/NewsandEvents/NJR14thAnnualReportrecordnumberofproceduresduri ng201617/tabid/1453/Default.aspx
  679. Van Der Straeten C. Results from a worldwide HR data base. Seoul : International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty, 2017.
  680. Girard J., Lons A., Pommepuy T., Isida R., Benad K., Putman S. High-impact sport after hip resurfacing: The Ironman triathlon // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 5. P. 675-678.
  681. Vendittoli P.A., Ganapathi M., Roy A.G., Lusignan D., Lavigne M. A comparison of clinical results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 28-mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomised trial with 3—6 years follow-up // Hip Int. 2010. Vol. 20, N 1. P. 1-13.
  682. Szymanski C., Thouvarecq R., Dujardin F., Migaud H., Maynou C., Girard J. Functional performance after hip resurfacing or total hip replacement: a comparative assessment with non-operated subjects // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2012. Vol. 98, N 1. P. 1-7.
  683. Bouffard V., Nantel J., Therrien M., Vendittoli P.A., Lavigne M., Prince F. Center of mass compensation during gait in hip arthroplasty patients: comparison between large diameter head total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing // Rehabil. Res. Pract. 2011. Vol. 2011. Article ID 586412.
  684. Girard J., Krantz N., Bocquet D., Wavreille G., Migaud H. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion // Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 2012. Vol. 27, N 2. P. 165-169.
  685. Beaule P.E., Harvey N., Zaragoza E., Le Duff M.J., Dorey F.J. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2007. Vol. 89, N 1. P. 9—15.
  686. Keurentjes J.C., Kuipers R.M., Wever D.J. et al. High incidence of squeaking in THAs with alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2008. Vol. 466, N6. P. 1438-1443.
  687. Brockett C.L., Harper P., Williams S., Isaac G.H., Dwyer-Joyce R.S., Jin Z. et al. The influence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements // J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2008. Vol. 19, N 4. P. 1575-1579.
  688. Blakeney W.G., Beaulieu Y., Puliero B., Lavigne M., Roy A., Masse V., Vendittoli P.A. Excellent results of large-diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty//Bone Joint J. 2018. Vol. 100-B, N 11. P. 1434-1441.
  689. Tai S.M., Munir S., Walter W.L., Pearce S.J., Walter W.K., Zicat B.A. Squeaking in large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2015. Vol. 30, N 2. P. 282-285.
  690. Pollard T.C., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., Bannister G.C. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2006. Vol. 88, N 5. P. 592-600.
  691. Learmonth I.D., Young Ñ., Rorabeck Ñ. The operation of the century: total hip replacement // Lancet. 2007. Vol. 370, N 9597. P. 1508-1519.
  692. Scheerlinck T., Casteleyn P.-P. The design features of cemented femoral hip implants //J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2006. Vol. 88, N 11. P. 1409-1418.
  693. Langlais F., Kerboull M., Sedel L., Ling R.S.M. The «French paradox» // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2003. Vol. 85, N 1. P. 17-20.
  694. Riviere C., Grappiolo G., Engh C.A., Vidalain J.-P., Chen A.-F., Boehler N. et al. Long-term bone remodeling around «legendary» cementless femoral stems // EFORT Open Rev. 2018. Vol. 3, N 2. P. 45-57.
  695. Jaffe W., Scott D.j Rationale and clinical application of hydroxyapatite coatings in pressfit total hip arthroplasty// Semin. Arthroplasty. 1993. Vol. 4, N 3. P. 159—166.
  696. Ferguson R.J., Palmer A.J., Taylor A., Porter M.L., Malchau H., Glyn-Jones S. Hip replacement// Lancet. 2018. Vol. 392, N 10 158. P. 1662—1671.
  697. Commitee N.S. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: 15th annual report, 2017. National Joint Registry Centre, 2018.
  698. McCarthy T.F., Nevelos J., Elmallah R.K., Chughtai M., Khlopas A., Alipit V. et al. The effect of pelvic tilt and femoral head size on hip range-of-motion to impingement I/ J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 11. P. 3544-3549.
  699. Ezquerra L., Quilez M.P., Perez M.A., Albareda J., Serai B. Range of movement for impingement and dislocation avoidance in total hip replacement predicted by finite element model // J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2017. Vol. 37, N 1. P. 26—34.
  700. Blakeney W.G., Beaulieu Y., Puliero B., Lavigne M., Roy A., Masse V. et al. Excellent results of large-diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2018. Vol. 100-B, N 11. P. 1434-1441.
  701. McDonnell S.M., Boyce G., Bare J., Young D., Shimmin AJ. The incidence of noise generation arising from the large-diameter Delta motion ceramic total hip bearing // Bone Joint J. 2013. Vol. 95-B, N 2. P. 160-165.
  702. Tai S.M., Munir S., Walter W.L., Pearce S.J., Walter W.K., Zicat B.A. Squeaking in large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2015.Vol. 30, N2. P. 282-285.
  703. Heffernan C., Baneqee S., Nevelos J., Macintyre J., Issa K., Market D.C. et al. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014. Vol. 472, N 5. P. 1535-1544.
  704. Dagneaux L., Marouby S., Maillot C., Canovas F., Riviere C. Dual mobility device reduces the risk of prosthetic hip instability for patients with degenerated spine: a casecontrol study// Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2019. Vol. 105, N 3. P. 461—466.
  705. Darrith B., Courtney P.M., Della Valle C.J. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature // Bone Joint J. 2018. Vol. 100-B, N 1. P. 11-19.
  706. Khanuja H.S., Banerjee S., Jain D., Pivec R., Mont M.A. Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2014. Vol. 96, N 20. P. 1742-1752.
  707. Mogliorini F., Biagini M., Rath B. Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials // Int. Orthop. 2018. Vol. 43, N 7. P. 1573—1582.
  708. Connolly K.P., Kamath A.F. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: comparative outcomes and contemporary results // World J. Orthop. 2016.Vol. 7, N 2. P. 94.
  709. Riviere C., Lazic S., Villet L., Wiart Y., Allwood S.M., Cobb J. Kinematic alignment technique for total hip and knee arthroplasty: the personalized implant positioning surgery// EFORT Open Rev. 2018. Vol. 3, N 3. P. 98—105.
  710. Bhaskar D., Rajpura A., Board T. Current concepts in acetabular positioning in total hip arthroplasty // Indian J. Orthop. 2017. Vol. 51, N 4. P. 386.
  711. Lazennec J.Y., Thauront F., Robbins C.B., Pour A.E. Acetabular and femoral anteversions in standing position are outside the proposed safe zone after total hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 11. P. 3550—3556.
  712. Meftah M., Yadav A., Wong A.C., Ranawat A.S., Ranawat C.S. A novel method for accurate and reproducible functional cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2013. Vol. 28, N 7. P. 1200—1205.
  713. Maratt J.D., Esposito Ñ.I., McLawhorn A.S., Jerabek S.A., Padgett D.E., Mayman D.J. Pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: when does it matter? // J. Arthroplasty. 2015. Vol. 30, N 3. P. 387-391.
  714. Dorr L.D., Malik A., Dastane M., Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009. Vol. 467, N I. P. 119—127.
  715. Archbold H.A.P., Mohammed M., O’Brien S., Molloy D., McConway J., Beverland D.E. Limb length restoration during total hip arthroplasty: use of a caliper to control femoral component insertion and accurate acetabular placement relative to the transverse acetabular ligament // Hip Int. 2006. Vol. 16, N I. P. 33—38.
  716. Hill J.C., Archbold H.A.P., Diamond O.J., Orr J.F., Jaramaz B., Beverland DE. Using a calliper to restore the centre of the femoral head during total hip replacement // J Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2012. Vol. 94, N 11. P. 1468—1474.
  717. Girard J., Lons A., Ramdane N., Putman S. Hip resurfacing before 50 years of age: a prospective study of979 hips with a mean follow-up of 5.1 years // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2018. Vol. 104, N 3. P. 295-299.
  718. Shin Y.-S., Suh D.-H., Park J.-H., Kim J.-L., Han S.-B. Comparison of specific femoral short stems and conventional-length stems in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty // Orthopedics. 2016. Vol. 39, N 2. P. e311— e117.
  719. Patel A.B., Wagle R.R., Usrey M.M., Thompson M.T., Incavo S.J., Noble P.C. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty//J. Arthroplasty. 2010. Vol. 25, N 8. P. 1275—1281. el.
  720. Meermans G., Van Doorn W.J., Koenraadt K., Kats J. The use of the transverse acetabular ligament for determining the orientation of the components in total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial // Bone Joint J. 2014. Vol. 96-B, N 3. P. 312-318.
  721. Beswick A.D., Wylde V., Gooberman-Hill R., Blom A., Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients // BMJ Open. 2012. Vol. 2, N 1. Article ID e000435.
  722. Marchetti E., Krantz N., Berton C., Bocquet D., Fouilleron N., Migaud H. et al. Component impingement in total hip arthroplasty: frequency and risk factors. A continuous retrieval analysis series of 416 cup//Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2011. Vol. 97, N 2. P. 127-133.
  723. Hua X., Li J., Jin Z., Fisher J. The contact mechanics and occurrence of edge loading in modular metal-on-polyethylene total hip replacement during daily activities // Med. Eng. Phys. 2016. Vol. 38, N 6. P. 518-525.
  724. Riviere C., Lazennec J.-Y., Van Der Straeten C., Auvinet E., Cobb J., Muirhead-Allwood S. The influence of spine-hip relations on total hip replacement: a systematic review // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 4. P. 559—568.
  725. Mayeda B.F., Haw J.G., Battenberg A.K., Schmalzried T.P. Femoral-acetabular mating: the effect of femoral and combined anteversion on cross-linked polyethylene wear // J. Arthroplasty. 2018. Vol. 33, N 10. P. 3320—3324.
  726. Nam D., Riegler V., Clohisy J.C., Nunley R.M., Barrack R.L. The impact of total hip arthroplasty on pelvic motion and functional component position is highly variable // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 4. P. 1200-1205.
  727. Mellon S.J., Grammatopoulos G., Andersen M.S., Pandit H.G., Gill H.S., Murray D.W. Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty // J. Biomech. 2015. Vol. 48, N 2. P. 318-323.
  728. McCarthy T.F., Alipit V., Nevelos J., Elmallah R.K., Mont M.A. Acetabular cup anteversion and inclination in hip range of motion to impingement // J. Arthroplasty. 2016.Vol. 31, N9. P. 264-268.
  729. Shoji T., Yamasaki T., Izumi S., Kenji M., Sawa M., Yasunaga Y. et al. The effect of cup medicalization and lateralization on hip range of motion in total hip arthroplasty //Clin. Biomech. 2018. Vol. 57. P. 121-128.
  730. Pierrepont J.W., Feyen H., Miles B.P., Young D.A., Bare J.V., Shimmin AJ. Functional orientation of the acetabular component in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty and its relevance to squeaking // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B, N 7. P. 910-916.
  731. Heckmann N., McKnight B., Stefl M., Trasolini N.A., Ike H., Dorr L.D. Late dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: spinopelvic imbalance as a causative factor //J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2018. Vol. 100, N21. P. 1845-1853.
  732. Grammatopoulos G., Dhaliwal K., Pradhan R., Parker S.J.M., Lynch K., Marshall R. Does lumbar arthrodesis compromise outcome of total hip arthroplasty? // Hip Int. 2019. Vol. 29, N 5. P. 496-503.
  733. Ochi H., Homma Y., Baba T., Nojiri H., Matsumoto M., Kaneko K. Sagittal spinopelvic alignment predicts hip function after total hip arthroplasty // Gait Posture. 2017.Vol. 52. P. 293-300.
  734. Abdel M.P., von Roth P., Jennings M.T., Hanssen A.D., Pagnano M.W. What safe zone? The vast majority of dislocated THAs are within the Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular component position // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2016. Vol. 474, N 2. P. 386-391.
  735. Goyal P., Lau A., Naudie D.D., Teeter M.G., Lanting B.A., Howard J.L. Effect of acetabular component positioning on functional outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty//J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 3. P. 843-848.
  736. Reininga I.H., Zijlstra W., Wagenmakers R., Boerboom A.L., Huijbers B.P., Groothoff J.W. et al. Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature // BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2010. Vol. 11, N 1. P. 92. URL: http://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/ articles/10.1186/1471 -2474-11-92
  737. McCarthy T.F., Alipit V., Nevelos J., Elmallah R.K., Mont M.A. Acetabular cup anteversion and inclination in hip range of motion to impingement // J. Arthroplasty. 2016. Vol. 31, N9. P. 264-268.
  738. Pierrepont J., Hawdon G., Miles B.P., Connor B.O., Bare J., Walter L.R. et al. Variation in functional pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 2. P. 184-191.
  739. Stefl M., Lundergan W., Heckmann N., McKnight B., Ike H., Murgai R. et al. Spinopelvic mobility and acetabular component position for total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 1. Suppl. A. P. 37-45.
  740. Phan D., Bederman S.S., Schwarzkopf R. The influence of sagittal spinal deformity on anteversion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2015. Vol. 97-B, N 8. P. 1017-1023.
  741. Riviere C. Kinematic versus conventional alignment techniques fortotal hip arthroplasty: a retrospective case control study // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2019. Vol. 105, N 5. P. 895-905.
  742. Spencer-Gardner L., Pierrepont J., Topham M., Bare J., McMahon S., Shimmin A.J. Patient-specific instrumentation improves the accuracy of acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B, N 10. P. 1342—1346.
  743. Menschik F. The hip joint as a conchoid shape // J. Biomech. I997. Vol. 30, N 9. P. 971-973.
  744. Gu D.-Y., Hu F., Wei J.-H., Dai K..-R., Chen Y.-Z. Contributions of non-spherical hip joint cartilage surface to hip joint contact stress // Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2011. Vol. 2011. P. 8166-8169.
  745. Dujardin F., Selva O., Mejjad O., Pasero D., Piraux J.L., Thomine J.M. Intra and interindividual variations of pelvic mobility in normal adult walk // Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice Appar. Mot. 1995. Vol. 81, N 7. P. 592—600.
  746. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., Graichen F., Rohlmann A., Strauss J. et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities // J. Biomech. 2001. Vol. 34, N 7. P. 859-871.
  747. Sanchez Egea A.J., Valera M., Parraga Quiroga J.M., Proubasta L, Noailly J., Lacroix D. Impact of hip anatomical variations on the cartilage stress: a finite element analysis towards the biomechanical exploration of the factors that may explain primary hip arthritis in morphologically normal subjects // Clin. Biomech. 2014. Vol. 29, N 4. p. 444-450.
  748. Dorr L.D., Malik A., Dastane M., Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. 2009. Vol. 467, N 1. P. 119—127.
  749. Underwood R.J., Zografos A., Sayles R.S., Hart A., Cann P. Edge loading in metal-on-metal hips: low clearance is a new risk factor // Proc. Inst. Meeh. Eng. H. 2012. Vol. 226, N 3. P. 217.
  750. Hart A.J., Ilo K„ Underwood R., Cann P., Henckel J., Lewis A. et al. The relationship between the angle of version and rate of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal resurfacings: a prospective, CT-based study// J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2011. Vol. 93, N 3. P. 315—320.
  751. Anderson J.Y., Trinkaus E. Patterns of sexual, bilateral and interpopulational variation in human femoral neck-shaft angles//J. Anat. 1998. Vol. 192, pt 2. P. 279—285.
  752. Gilligan I., Chandraphak S., Mahakkanukrauh P. Femoral neck-shaft angle in humans: variation relating to climate, clothing, lifestyle, sex, age and side // J. Anat. 2013. Vol. 223, N 2. P. 133-151.
  753. Milligan D.J., O’Brien S., Bennett D., Hill J.C., Beverland D.E. The effects of age and gender on the diameter of the femoral canal in patients who undergo total hip replacement // Bone Joint J. 2013. Vol. 95-B, N 3. P. 339—342.
  754. Tannenbaum E., Kopydlowski N., Smith M., Bedi A., Sekiya JK. Gender and racial differences in focal and global acetabular version //J. Arthroplasty. 2014. Vol. 29, N 2. P. 373-376.
  755. Wang S.C., Brede C., Lange D., Poster C.S., Lange A.W., Kohoyda-lnglis C. et al. Gender differences in hip anatomy: possible implications for injury tolerance in frontal collisions //Annu. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Automot. Med. 2004. Vol. 48. P. 287.
  756. Nakahara L, Takao M., Sakai T., Nishii T., Yoshikawa H., Sugano N. Gender differences in 3D morphology and bony impingement of human hips //J. Orthop. Res. 2011. Vol. 29, N 3. P. 333-339.
  757. Traina F., De Clerico M., Biondi F., Pilla F., Tassinari E., Toni A. Sex differences in hip morphology: is stem modularity effective for total hip replacement? //J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009. Vol. 91, suppl. 6. P. 121—128.
  758. DeSilva J.M., Rosenberg K.R. Anatomy, development, and function of the human pelvis// Anat. Rec. (Hoboken). 2017. Vol. 300, N 4. P. 628—632.
  759. Endo K., Suzuki H., Nishimura H., Tanaka H., Shishido T., Yamamoto K. Characteristics of sagittal spinopelvic alignment in Japanese young adults // Asian Spine J. 2014. Vol. 8, N 5. P. 599.
  760. Legaye J., Duval-Beaupere G., Hecquet J., Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves // Eur. Spine J. 1998. Vol. 7, N2. P. 99-103.
  761. Wassilew G.I., Heller M.O., Janz V., Perka C., Muller M., Renner L. High prevalence of acetabular retroversion in asymptomatic adults: a 3D CT-based study // Bone Joint J. 2017. Vol. 99-B, N 12. P. 1584-1589.
  762. Krebs V., Incavo S.J., Shields W.H. The anatomy of the acetabulum: what is normal? // Clin. Orthop. 2009. Vol. 467, N 4. P. 868.
  763. Diesel C.V., Ribeiro T.A., Coussirat C., Scheidt R.B., Macedo C.A., Galia C.R. Coxa profunda in the diagnosis of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement and its prevalence in asymptomatic subjects // Bone Joint J. 2015. Vol. 97-B, N 4. P. 478—483.
  764. Tian F.-D., Zhao D.-W., Wang W., Guo L., Tian S.-Ì., Feng A. et al. Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional survey // Chin. Med. J. 2017. Vol. 130, N 11. P. 1261-1268.
  765. Shon W.Y., Gupta S., Biswal S., Hur C.Y., Jajodia N., Hong S.J. et al. Validation of a simple radiographic method to determine variations in pelvic and acetabular cup sagittal plane alignment after total hip arthroplasty // Skeletal Radiol. 2008. Vol. 37, N 12. P. 1119-1127.
  766. Eddine T.A., Migaud H., Chantelot C., Cotten A., Fontaine C., Duquennoy A. Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions: analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of position of a prosthetic cup // Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2001. Vol. 23, N 2. P. 105—110.
  767. Lazennec J.-Y., Rousseau M.-A., Brusson A., Folinais D., Arnel M., Clarke I. et al. Total hip prostheses in standing, sitting and squatting positions: an overview of our 8 years practice using the EOS imaging technology // Open Orthop. J. 2015. Vol. 9. P. 26—44.
  768. Grammatopoulos G., Gofton W., Cochran M., Dobransky J., Carli A., Abdelbary H. et al. Pelvic positioning in the supine position leads to more consistent orientation of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty // Bone Joint J. 2018. Vol. 100-B( 10). P. 1280-1288.
  769. Boese C.K., Dargel J., Oppermann J., Eysel P., Scheyerer M.J., Bredow J. et al. The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review // Skeletal Radiol. 2016. Vol. 45, N 1. P. 19-28.
  770. Fessy M.H., Seutin B., Bejui J. Anatomical basis for the choice of the femoral implant in the total hip arthroplasty // Surg. Radiol. Anat. 1997. Vol. 19, N 5. P. 283—286.
  771. Beaule P.E., Campbell P., Lu Z., Leunig-Ganz K., Beck M., Leunig M. et al. Vascularity of the arthritic femoral head and hip resurfacing // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2006. Vol. 88, suppl. 4. P. 85-96.
  772. Scheerlinck T. Cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty // Acta Orthop. Belg. 2014. Vol. 80, N 3. P. 336-347.
  773. Lecerf G., Fessy M.H., Philippot R., Massin P., Giraud F., FlecherX. et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2009. Vol. 95, N 3. P. 210-219.
  774. Pierchon F., Migaud H., Duquennoy A., Fontaine C. Radiologic evaluation of the rotation center of the hip // Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice Appar. Mot. 1993. Vol. 79, N 4. P. 281-284.
  775. Riviere C., Lazennec J.-Y., Van Der Straeten C., Auvinet E., Cobb J., Muirhead-Allwood S. The influence of spine-hip relations on total hip replacement: a systematic review// Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017. Vol. 103, N 4. P. 559—568.
  776. Murphy W.S., Yun H.H., Hayden B., Kowal J.H., Murphy S.B. The safe zone range for cup anteversion is narrower than for inclination in THA // Clin. Orthop. 2018. Vol. 476, N 2. P. 325-335.
  777. Upadhyay A., York S., Macaulay W., McGrory B., Robbennolt J., Bal B.S. Medical malpractice in hip and knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. 2007. Vol. 22, N 6. Suppl. P. 2—7.e4.
  778. Bsat S., Frei H., Beaule P.E. The acetabular labrum: a review of its function // Bone Joint J. 2016. Vol. 98-B, N 6. P. 730-735.
  779. Crowninshield R.D., Maloney W.J., Wentz D.H., Humphrey S.M., Blanchard C.R. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don’t do // Clin. Orthop. 2004. Vol. 429. P. 102-107.
  780. Matsushita L, Morita Y., Ito Y., Gejo R., Kimura T. Activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty. Is a 32-mm femoral head superior to a 26-mm head for improving daily activities? // Int. Orthop. 2011. Vol. 35, N 1. P. 25—29.
  781. Karimi D., Kallemose T., Troelsen A., Klit J. Hip malformation is a very common finding in young patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2018. Vol. 138, N 4. P. 581 -589.
  782. Fottner A., Peter C.V., Schmidutz F., Wanke-Jellinek L., Schroder C., Mazoochian F. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different offset versions of a cementless hip prosthesis by 3-dimensional measurement of micromotions // Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 2011. Vol. 26, N 8. P. 830-835.
  783. Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W.M., Gray J.A., Haynes R.B., Richardson W.S. Evidencebased medicine: what it is and what it isn’t // BMJ. 1996. Vol. 312, N 7023. P. 71—72.
  784. Panesar S.S., Philippon M.J., Bhandari M. Principles of evidence-based medicine // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2010. Vol. 41, N 2. P. 131-138.
  785. Guyatt G.H., Oxman A.D., Kunz R., Vist G.E., Falck-Ytter Y., Schiinemann H.J.; GRADE Working Group. What is «quality of evidence» and why is it important to clinicians? // BMJ. 2008. Vol. 336, N 7651. P. 995-998.
  786. Wilson K. Evidence-based medicine. The good the bad and the ugly. A clinician’s perspective //J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2010. Vol. 16, N 2. P. 398—400.
  787. Guyatt G.H., Haynes R.B., Jaeschke R.Z. et al. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users’ Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group // JAMA. 2000. Vol. 284. P. 290-296.
  788. Kelly M.P., Heath I., Howick J., Greenhalgh T. The importance of values in evidencebased medicine // BMC Med. Ethics. 2015. Vol. 16, N 1. P. 69.
  789. Guyatt G., Montori V., Devereaux P.J., Schiinemann H., Bhandari M. Patients at the center: in our practice, and in our use of language // ACP J. Club. 2004. Vol. 140, N 1. P. A11-A12.
  790. McMaster Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Workshops. URL: https://ebm.mcmaster.ca/
  791. Academy of Medical Sciences. Stratified, personalized or P4 medicine: a new direction for placing the patient at the centre of healthcare and health education (Technical report). 2015. URL: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/download?f=le&i=32644
  792. Gunaratne R., Pratt D.N., Banda J., Fick D.P., Khan R.J.K., Robertson B.W. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature // J. Arthroplasty. 2017. Vol. 32, N 12. P. 3854-3860.
  793. Guyatt G., Jaeschke R. Evolution of EBM. Part 1: EBM and personalized medicine. Are they different? 2018. URL: https://empendium.com/mcmtextbook/interviews/ perspective/197445,evolution-of-ebm-partl-ebm-and-personalized-medicine-are-they-different
  794. Montori V.M., Breslin M., Maleska M., Weymiller A.J. Creating a conversation: insights from the development of a decision aid // PLoS Med. 2007. Vol. 4, N 8. P. e233.
  795. Sacristan J.A., Aguaron A., Avendano-Sola C., Garrido P., Carrion J., Gutierrez A. et al. Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how // Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 631-640.
  796. Sun X., loannidis J.P., Agoritsas T., Alba A.C., Guyatt G. How to use a subgroup analysis: users’ guide to the medical literature // JAMA. 2014. Vol. 311, N 4. P. 405— 411.
  797. SPRINT Investigators; Sun X., Heels-Ansdell D., Walter S.D., Guyatt G., Sprague S., Bhandari M. et aL Is a subgroup claim believable? A user’s guide to subgroup analyses in the surgical literature //J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011. Vol. 93, N 3. P. e8.
  798. Guyatt G., Jaeschke R., McGinn T. PART. 2B1: therapy and validity. N-of-1 randomized controlled trials // Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature / eds G. Guyatt, D. Rennie, M.O. Meade, D.J. Cook. New York : McGraw-Hill; American Medical Association, 2002. P. 275—290.
  799. Iorio A., Spencer F.A., Falavigna M., Alba C., Lang E., Burnand B. et al. Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients // BMJ. 2015. Vol. 350. P. h870.

 õîäå ïîäãîòîâêè ñòàòåé ïî ýíäîïðîòåçèðîâàíèþ òàçîáåäðåííîãî è êîëåííîãî ñóñòàâîâ - ëèòåðàòóðà îòå÷åñòâåííûõ àâòîðîâ íå èñïîëüçîâàëàñü.

- Âåðíóòüñÿ â ðàçäåë "òðàâìàòîëîãèÿ"

Ðåäàêòîð: Èñêàíäåð Ìèëåâñêè. Äàòà îáíîâëåíèÿ ïóáëèêàöèè: 30.7.2025
Ìåäóíèâåð Ïîèñê ïî ñàéòó è åãî ðàçäåëû Êîíòàêòû, ðåêëàìà
Èíôîðìàöèÿ íà ñàéòå ïîäëåæèò êîíñóëüòàöèè ëå÷àùèì âðà÷îì è íå çàìåíÿåò î÷íîé êîíñóëüòàöèè ñ íèì.
Ñì. ïîäðîáíåå â ïîëüçîâàòåëüñêîì ñîãëàøåíèè.