В ходе подготовки статей по лучевым методам обследования (КТ, МРТ, УЗИ) челюстно-лицевой области и полости рта для пользователей сайта МедУнивер использованы труды следующих авторов:

1. Chan Н. L. et al. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography. J. Periodontol. 2011; 82 (1): 129-135.
2. Leong D. J. et al. Risk of lingual plate perforation during implant placement in the posterior mandible: a human cadaver study. Implant Dent. 2011; 20 (5): 360-363.
3. Parnia F. et al. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2010; 109 (1): e32-36.
4. Nahlieli O. et al. Salivary gland injury subsequent to implant surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2008; 23 (3): 556-560.
5. Kalpidis C. D. et al. Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: a review of the literature. J. Periodontol. 2004; 75 (5): 631-645.
6. Hofschneider U. et al. Assessment of the blood supply to the mental region for reduction of bleeding complications during implant surgery in the interforaminal region. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 1999; 14 (3): 379-383.
7. Juodzbalys G. et al. Inferior alveolar nerve injury associated with implant surgery. Clin. Oral Implants. Res. 2013; 24 (2): 183-190.
8. Daftary F. et al. Lifelong craniofacial growth and the implications for osseointegrated implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2013; 28 (1): 163-169.
9. Vera C. et al. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2012; 27 (6): 1514-1519.
10. Al-Faraje L. Surgical Complications in Oral Implantology. Surrey: Quintessence Publishing, 2011.
11. Braut V. et al. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011; 31 (2): 125-131.
12. Timock A. M. et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140 (5): 734-744.
13. Razavi T. et al. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21 (7): 718-725.
14. Misch С. E. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2008.
15. Belser U. C. et al. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2004; 19 (suppl.): 30-42.
16. Geckili О. et al. Evaluation of possible prognostic factors for the success, survival, and failure of dental implants. Implant. Dent. 2014; 23(1): 44-50.
17. Anamali S. et al. Prevalence of the posterior superior alveolar canal in cone beam computed tomography scans. Clin. Oral Implants Res. Epub ahead of print, 2013.
18. Toziim T. F. et al. Evaluation of maxillary incisive canal characteristics related to dental implant treatment with computerized tomography: a clinical multicenter study. J. Periodontol. 2012; 83 (3): 337-343.
19. Bornstein M. M. et al. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22 (3): 295-301.
20. El-Ghareeb М. et al. Nasal floor augmentation for the reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla: a case series. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012; 70 (3): e235-e241.
21. Garg A. K. Subnasal elevation and bone augmentation in dental implantology. Dent. Implantol. Update. 2008; 19 (3): 17-21.
22. Crismani A. G. et al. Nasal cavity perforation by palatal implants: false-positive records on the lateral cephalogram. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2005; 20 (2): 267-273.
23. Raghoebar G. M. et al. Rhino-sinusitis related to endosseous implants extending into the nasal cavity. A case report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2004; 33 (3): 312-314.
24. Lundgren S. et al. Bone grafting to the maxillary sinuses, nasal floor and anterior maxilla in the atrophic edentulous maxilla. A two-stage technique. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1997; 26 (6): 428-434.
25. Tolman D. E. Advanced residual ridge resorption: surgical management. Int. J. Prosthodont. 1993; 6 (2): 118-125.
26. Branemark P. I. et al. An experimental and clinical study of osseointegrated implants penetrating the nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1984; 42 (8): 497-505.
27. Nolan Р. J. et al. Correlation between Schneiderian membrane perforation and sinus lift graft outcome: a retrospective evaluation of 359 augmented sinus. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2014; 72 (1): 47-52.
28. Froum S. J. et al. Effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on vital bone formation and implant survival: a retrospective study. J. Periodontol. 2013; 84 (8): 1094-1099.
29. Singh A. et al. SEM analysis and management of fracture dental implant. Case Rep. Dent. 2013; 2013:270385.
30. Waddell J. N. et al. Scanning electron microscopy observations of failures of implant overdenture bars: a case series report. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2010; 12 (1); 26-38.
31. Al Quran F. A. et al. Management of dental implant fractures. A case history. J. Oral Implantol. 2009; 35 (4): 210-214.
32. Kinsel R. P. et al. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2009; 101 (6): 388-394.
33. Conrad H. J. et al. Fractures related to occlusal overload with single posterior implants: a clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2008; 99 (4): 251-256.
34. Gargallo Albiol J. et al. Endosseous dental implant fractures: an analysis of 21 cases. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2008; 13 (2): E124-128.
35. Khraisat A. Stability of implant-abutment interface with a hexagon-mediated butt joint: failure mode and bending resistance. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2005; 7 (4): 221-228.
36. Mohamed J. В. et al. The management of retrograde periimplantitis: a case report. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2012; 6 (9): 1600-1602.
37. Chan H. L. et al. Retrograde peri-implantitis: a case report introducing an approach to its management. J. Periodontol. 2011; 82 (7): 1080-1088.
38. Mohamed J. B. et al. Retrograde peri-implantitis. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2010; 14 (1): 57-65.
39. Waasdorp J. et al. Nonsurgical treatment of retrograde periimplantitis: a case report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2010; 25 (4): 831-833.
40. Resting M. R. et al. Severe osteomyelitis following immediate placement of a dental implant. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2008; 23 (1): 137-142.
41. O’Sullivan D. et al. Osteomyelitis and pathological mandibular fracture related to a late implant failure: a clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2006; 95 (2): 106-110.
42. Quirynen M. et al. Predisposing conditions for retrograde peri-implantitis, and treatment suggestions. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16 (5): 599-608.
43. Wiskott H. W. et al. Reversible and irreversible peri-implant lesions: report and etiopathogenic analysis of 7 cases. J. Oral Implantol. 2004; 30 (4): 255-266.
44. Piattelli A. et al. Localized chronic suppurative bone infection as a sequel of peri-implantitis in a hydroxyapatitecoated dental implant. Biomaterials. 1995; 16 (12): 917-920.
45. Pesce Р. et al. Peri-implantitis: a systematic review of recently published papers. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2014; 27 (1): 15-25.
46. Atieh M. A. et al. The frequency of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Periodontol. 2013; 84 (11): 1586-1598.
47. Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a current understanding of their diagnoses and clinical implications. J. Periodontol. 2013; 84 (4): 436-443.
48. Alikhasi М. et al. The effect of implant angulation on the transfer accuracy of external-connection implants. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. Epub ahead of print, 2013.
49. Alves M. Jr. et al. Root repair after contact with miniimplants: systematic review of the literature. Eur. J. Orthod. 2013; 35 (4): 491-499.
50. Shinohara A. et al. Root proximity and inclination of orthodontic mini-implants after placement: conebeam computed tomography evaluation. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 2013; 144 (1): 50-56.
51. Wanner L. et al. Review of unusual intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with endosseous implant placement. Quintessence Int. 2013; 44 (10): 773-781.
52. Hinckfuss S. et al. Effect of surgical guide design and surgeon’s experience on the accuracy of implant placement. J. Oral Implantol. 2012; 38 (4): 311-323.
53. Gupta J. et al. Cone beam computed tomography in oral implants. Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2013; 4 (1): 2-6.
54. Leite G. M. et al. Anatomic variations and lesions of the mandibular canal detected by cone beam computed tomography. Surg. Radiol. Anat. Epub ahead of print, 2013.
55. Raes F. et al. Reliability of circumferential bone level assessment around single implants in healed ridges and extraction sockets using cone beam CT. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2013; 15 (5): 661-672.
56. Benavides E. et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant. Dent. 2012; 21 (2): 78-86.
57. Tyndall D. A. et al. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2012; 113 (6); 817-826.
58. Almog D. M. Restricting preoperative diagnosis to twodimensional images in oral implantology can potentially cause implant failures. Alpha Omegan. 2010; 103 (4): 136-140.
59. Froum S. J. et al. Effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on vital bone formation and implant survival: a retrospective study. J. Periodontol. 2013; 84 (8): 1094-1099.
60. Guerrero J. S. et al. Lateral wall sinus floor elevation for implant placement: revisiting fundamentals and the surgical technique. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2013; 41 (3): 185-187,190-195.
61. Wen S. C. et al. Classification and management of antral septa for maxillary sinus augmentation. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33 (4): 509-517.
62. Crespi R. et al. Sinus floor elevation by osteotome: hand mallet versus electric mallet. A prospective clinical study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2012; 27 (5): 1144-1150.
63. Mazor Z. et al. Nasal floor elevation combined with dental implant placement. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2012; 14 (5): 768-771.
64. Pommer B. et al. Prevalence, location and morphology of maxillary sinus septa: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2012; 39 (8): 769-773.
65. Romero-Millan J. et al. Indirect osteotome maxillary sinus floor elevation: an update. J. Oral Implantol. 2012; 38 (6): 799-804.
66. Stern A. et al. Sinus lift procedures: an overview of current techniques. Dent. Clin. North Am. 2012; 56 (1): 219-233, X.
67. Taschieri S. et al. Osteotome-mediated sinus lift without grafting material: A review of literature and a technique proposal. Int. J. Dent. 2012; 2012:849093.
68. Wallace S. S. et al. Maxillary sinus elevation by lateral window approach: evolution of technology and technique. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 2012; 12 (suppl. 3): 161-171.
69. Chiang Т. et al. Reconstruction of the narrow ridge using combined ridge split and guided bone regeneration with rhPDGF-BB growth factor-enhanced allograft. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34 (1): 123-130.
70. Chasioti E. et al. Maintaining space in localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration with tenting screw technology. Quintessence Int. 2013; 44 (10): 763-771.
71. Draenert F. G. et al. Vertical bone augmentation procedures: Basics and techniques in dental implantology. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2013. Epub ahead of print.
72. De Stavola L. et al. Results of vertical bone augmentation with autogenous bone block grafts and the tunnel technique: a clinical prospective study of 10 consecutively treated patients. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33 (5): 651-659.
73. Jo J. H. et al. Bone graft using block allograft as a treatment of failed implant sites: clinical case reports. Implant. Dent. 2013; 22 (3): 219-223.
74. Hauser F. et al. Clinical and histological evaluation of postextraction platelet-rich fibrin socket filling: a prospective randomized controlled study. Implant. Dent. 2013; 22 (3): 295-303
75. Thalmair T. et al. Dimensional alterations of extraction sites after different alveolar ridge preservation techniques — a volumetric study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2013; 40 (7): 721-727.
76. Wallace S.C. Guided bone regeneration for socket preservation in molar extraction sites: histomorphometric and 3D computerized tomography analysis. J. Oral Implantol. 2013; 39 (4): 503-509.
77. Barone A. et al. Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial. J. Periodontol. 2014; 85(1): 14-23.
78. Chan H.L. et al. Alterations in bone quality after socket preservation with grafting materials: a systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2013; 28 (3): 710-720.
79. Hauser E et al. Clinical and histological evaluation of postextraction platelet-rich fibrin socket filling: a prospective randomized controlled study. Implant. Dent. 2013; 22 (3): 295-303.
80. Steiner G.G. et al. The healing socket and socket regeneration. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2008; 29 (2): 114-116, 118, 120-124 passim.
81. Chan Н.L. et al. Alterations in bone quality after socket preservation with grafting materials: a systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2013; 28 (3): 710-720.
82. Hauser F. et al. Clinical and histological evaluation of postextraction platelet-rich fibrin socket filling: a prospective randomized controlled study. Implant. Dent. 2013; 22 (3): 295-303.
83. Lindhe J. et al. Ridge preservation with the use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2013. Epub ahead of print.
84. Thalmair T. et al. Dimensional alterations of extraction sites after different alveolar ridge preservation techniques — a volumetric study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2013; 40 (7): 721-727.
85. Wallace S. C. Guided bone regeneration for socket preservation in molar extraction sites: histomorphometric and 3D computerized tomography analysis. J. Oral Implantol. 2013; 39 (4): 503-509.
86. Andras D. et al. Comparison of autologous bone graft remodeling from different donor sites in the jaws using cone beam computed tomography. Fogorv. Sz. 2012; 105 (3): 91-98.
87. Horowitz R. et al. A review on alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 2012; 12 (Suppl. 3): 149-160.
88. Horowitz R. A. et al. Enhancing extraction socket therapy with a biphasic calcium sulfate. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2012; 33 (6): 420-426.
89. Lambert F. et al. A methodological approach to assessing alveolar ridge preservation procedures in humans: hard tissue profile. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2012; 39 (9): 887-894.
90. Beaman F. D. et al. Imaging characteristics of bone graft materials. Radiographics. 2006; 26 (2): 373-388.
91. Yen С. С. et al. Comparison of treatment effects of guided tissue regeneration on infrabony lesions between animal and human studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Periodontal. Res. Epub ahead of print. 2013.
92. Reija М. F. et al. Bilateral submandibular gland aplasia with hypertrophy of the sublingual glands of a patient with a cleft lip and palate: case report. J. Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24 (5): e532-e533.
93. Enhos S. et al. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82 (5): 868-874.
94. Garcia-Garcia A.S. et al. Current status of the torus palatinus and torus mandibularis. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2010; 15 (2): e353-e360.
95. Moraes Junior E. F. et al. Torus palatinus: a graft option for alveolar ridge reconstruction. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010; 30 (3): 283-289.
96. Al Quran F. A. et al. Torus palatinus and torus mandibularis in edentulous patients. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2006; 7 (2): 112-119.
97. Belsky J. L. et al. Torus palatinus: a new anatomical correlation with bone density in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003; 88 (5): 2081-2086.
98. Jainkittivong A. et al. Buccal and palatal exostoses: prevalence and concurrence with tori. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2000; 90 (1): 48-53.
99. Antoniades D. Z. et al. Concurrence of torus palatinus with palatal and buccal exostoses: case report and review of the literature. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1998; 85 (5): 552-557.
100. Gorsky M. et al. Genetic influence on the prevalence of torus palatinus. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1998; 75 (2): 138-140.
101. Maclnnis E.L. et al. Gigantiform Torus palatinus: review of the literature and report of a case. Int. Dent J. 1998; 48 (1): 40-43.
102. Garcia-Garcia A.S. et al: Current status of the torus palatinus and torus mandibularis. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2010; 15 (2): e353- e360.
103. Proussaefs P. Clinical and histologic evaluation of the use of mandibular tori as donor site for mandibular block autografts: report of three cases. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26 (1): 43-51.
104. Sisman Y. et al. Anterior Stafne bone defect mimicking a residual cyst: a case report. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2010; 39 (2): 124-126.
105. Quesada-Gomez C. et al. Stafne bone cavity: a retrospective study of 11 cases. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2006; 11 (3): E277- E280.
106. Shimizu M. et al. CT analysis of the Stafne’s bone defects of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2006; 35 (2): 95-102.
107. Philipsen H. P. et al. Lingual and buccal mandibular bone depressions: a review based on 583 cases from a worldwide literature survey, including 69 new cases from Japan. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2002; 31 (5): 281-290.
108. Kuribayashi A. et al. Bifid mandibular canals: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2010; 39 (4): 235-239.
109. Naitoh M. et al. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2010; 109 (1): e25-31
110. Naitoh M. et al. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2009; 24 (1): 155-159.
111. Rouas P. et al. Identification of double mandibular canals: literature review and three case reports with CT scans and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2007; 36 (1): 34-38.
112. Fanibunda K. et al. The relationship between accessory foramina and tumour spread on the medial mandibular surface. J. Anat. 2000; 196 (Pt. 1): 23-29.
113. Nortje C. J. et al. Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br. J. Oral Surg. 1977; 15 (1): 55-63.
114. Miloglu О. et al. The frequency and characteristics of idiopathic osteosclerosis and condensing osteitis lesions in a Turkish patient population. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2009; 14 (12): e640-645.
115. MacDonald-Jankowski D. S. Idiopathic osteosclerosis in the jaws of Britons and of the Hong Kong Chinese: radiology and systematic review. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 1999; 28 (6): 357-363.
116. Agrawal N. et al. Alveolar bone exostoses subsequent to orthodontic implant placement. BMJ Case Rep. 2013; 2013.
117. Drew H. et al. Use of a buccal exostosis autograft for alveolar ridge augmentation: an aid to implant placement. J. N. J. Dent. Assoc. 2007; 78(3): 40-42.
118. Lee Т. J. et al. Extensive paranasal sinus mucoceles: a 15-year review of 82 cases. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2009; 30 (4): 234-238.
119. Landsberg R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-aided navigation in endoscopic sinus surgery of a bone-destructive sphenoclinoid mucocele. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2003; 112 (8): 740-744.
120. Garg A. K. et al. Maxillary antral mucocele and its relevance for maxillary sinus augmentation grafting: a case report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2000; 15 (2): 287-290.
121. Lloyd G. et al. Optimum imaging for mucoceles. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2000; 114(3): 233-236.
122. Mardinger О. et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation in the presence of antral pseudocyst: a clinical approach. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2007; 103 (2): 180-184.
123. Nair S. Correlation between symptoms and radiological findings in patients of chronic rhinosinusitis: a modified radiological typing system. Rhinology. 2009; 47 (2): 181-186.
124. Bhattacharyya N. Relationship between mucosal inflammation, computed tomography, and symptomatology in chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2008; 117(7): 517-522.
125. Rosenfeld R. М. et al. Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2007; 137 (suppl. 3): S1-S31.
126. Mafee M. F. et al. Imaging of rhinosinusitis and its complications: plain film, CT, and MRI. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2006; 30 (3): 165-186.
127. Lana J. Р. et al. Anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus detected in cone beam computed tomography for dental implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 (12): 1398-1403.
128. Chrcanovic B. R. et al. Maxillary sinus aplasia. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2010; 14 (3): 187-191.
129. Guven D. G. et al. Combined aplasia of sphenoid, frontal, and maxillary sinuses accompanied by ethmoid sinus hypoplasia. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2010; 21 (5): 1431-1433.
130. Nagasao T. et al. A rare case of congenital unilateral hypoplasia of the nose. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2009; 62 (9): 305-308.
131. Song S. Y. et al. Volume and distances of the maxillary sinus in craniofacial deformities with midfacial hypoplasia. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2009; 141 (5): 614-620.
132. Garg R. K. et al. Clinical spectrum of cleidocranial dysplasia: a case report. Cases J. 2008; 1 (1): 377.
133. Lawson W. et al. The development and pathologic processes that influence maxillary sinus pneumatization. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken). 2008; 291 (11): 1554-1563.
134. Selcuk A. et al. Variations of maxillary sinus and accompanying anatomical and pathological structures. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2008; 19 (1): 159-164.
135. Birkent H. et al. Progressive maxillary sinus hypoplasia with open ostium. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2007; 18 (3): 706-708.
136. Pino Rivero V. et al. Maxillary sinus hypoplasia masquerading a chronic sinusitis. An Otorrinolaringol. Ibero Am. 2007; 34 (4): 323-328.
137. Price D. L. et al. Facial asymmetry in maxillary sinus hypoplasia. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 71 (10): 1627-1630.
138. Tasar M. et al. Bilateral maxillary sinus hypoplasia and aplasia: radiological and clinical findings. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2007; 36 (7): 412-415.
139. Hazza’a A.M. et al. Radiographic features of the jaws and teeth in thalassaemia major. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2006; 35 (4): 283-288.
140. Khanobthamchai K. et al. Ethmomaxillary sinus and hypoplasia of maxillary sinus. J. Otolaryngol. 1991; 20 (6): 425-427.
141. Brook I. Sinusitis of odontogenic origin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2006; 135 (3): 349-355.
142. Matjaz R. et al. Sinus maxillaris mycetoma of odontogenic origin: case report. Braz. Dent. J. 2004; 15 (3): 248-250.
143. Mehra P. et al. Maxillary sinus disease of odontogenic origin. Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 2004; 37 (2); 347-364.
144. Sharif F. Nj. et al. Interventions for the treatment of keratocystic odontogenic tumours (KCOT, odontogenic keratocysts (OKC)). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010; (9): CD008464.
145. Hyun H. K. et al. Recurrent keratocystic odontogenic tumor in the mandible: a case report and literature review. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2009; 108 (2): 7-10.
146. Kuroyanagi N. et al. Prognostic factors for keratocystic odontogenic tumor (odontogenic keratocyst): analysis of clinico-pathologic and immunohistochemical findings in cysts treated by enucleation. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2009; 38 (4): 386-392.
147. Slootweg P. J. Lesions of the jaws. Histopathology. 2009; 54 (4): 401-418.
148. Gonzalez-Alva P. et al. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor; a retrospective study of 183 cases. J. Oral Sci. 2008; 50 (2): 205-212.
149. Madras J. et al. Keratocystic odontogenic tumour: reclassification of the odontogenic keratocyst from cyst to tumour. J. Can. Dent Assoc. 2008; 74 (2): 165-165h.
150. Sumi M. et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of ameloblastomas and keratocystic odontogenic tumors: differentiation by apparent diffusion coefficients of cystic lesions. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008; 29 (10): 1897-1901.
151. Chirapathomsakul D. et al. A review of odontogenic keratocysts and the behavior of recurrences. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2006; 101 (1): 5-9; discussion 10.
152. Regezi J. A. Odontogenic cysts, odontogenic tumors, fibroosseous, and giant cell lesions of the jaws. Mod. Pathol. 2002; 15 (3): 331-341.
153. Sumer А. Р. et al. Nasolabial cyst: case report with CT and MRI findings. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2010; 109 (2): 92-94.
154. Yuen H. W. et al. Nasolabial cysts: clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment. Br.J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2007; 45 (4): 293-297.
155. McCrea S. J. Nasopalatine duct cyst, a delayed complication to successful dental implant placement: diagnosis and surgical management. J. Oral Implantol. Epub ahead of print, 2012.
156. Cicciu M et al. Rare bilateral nasopalatine duct cysts: a case report. Open Dent. J. 2010; 4:8-12.
157. Casado P. L. et al. Immediate dental implant failure associated with nasopalatine duct cyst. Implant. Dent. 2008; 17 (2): 169-175.
158. Escoda Francoli J. et al. Nasopalatine duct cyst: report of 22 cases and review of the literature. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2008; 13 (7): E438- E443.
159. Hegde R. J. et al. Nasopalatine duct cyst. J. Indian Soc. Pedod. Prev. Dent. 2006; 24 (2 Suppl.): S31- S32.
160. Elliott K. A. et al. Diagnosis and surgical management of nasopalatine duct cysts. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114 (8): 1336-1340.
161. Swanson K. S. et al. Nasopalatine duct cyst: an analysis of 334 cases. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1991; 49 (3): 268-271.
162. Kumar N. D. et al. Solitary bone cyst. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2011; 22 (1): 172-174.
163. Galzignato Р. F. et al. Dental implant failure associated with a residual maxillary cyst. Br. Dent. J. 2010; 208 (4): 153-154.
164. Sisman Y. et al. Anterior Stafne bone defect mimicking a residual cyst: a case report. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2010; 39 (2): 124-126.
165. Murmura G. et al. Residual and inflammatory radicular cysts. Clinical and pathological aspects of 2 cases. Minerva Stomatol. 2004:53(11-12): 693-701.
166. Dimitroulis G. et al. Massive residual dental cyst: case report. Aust. Dent. J. 1998; 43 (4): 234-237.
167. High A. S. et al. Symptomatic residual radicular cysts. J. Oral Pathol. 1988; 17 (2): 70-72.
168. Bernstein B. The residual radicular dental cyst. A case report and discussion. NY State Dent. J. 1976; 42 (9): 548-551.
169. Oehlers F. A. Periapical lesions and residual dental cysts. Br. J. Oral Surg. 1970; 8 (2): 103-113.
170. Singer S. R. et al. Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia and chronic diffuse osteomyelitis Report of a simultaneous presentation and review of the literature. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2005; 136 (7): 927-931.
171. Bencharit S. et al. Surgical and prosthodontic rehabilitation for a patient with aggressive florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: a clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003; 90 (3): 220-224.
172. MacDonald-Jankowski D. S. Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2003; 32 (3): 141-149.
173. Beylouni I. et al. Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: Report of a case documented with computed tomography and 3D imaging. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1998; 85 (6): 707-711.
174. Ariji Y. et al. Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia. Radiographic study with special emphasis on computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1994; 78 (3): 391-396.
175. Summerlin D. J. et al. Focal cemento-osseous dysplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 221 cases. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1994; 78 (5): 611-620.
176. Loh F. C. et al. Florid osseous dysplasia in Orientals. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1989; 68 (6): 748-753.
177. Horner K. et al. Atypical simple bone cysts of the jaws. II: A possible association with benign fibro-osseous (cemental) lesions of the jaws. Clin. Radiol. 1988; 39 (1): 59-63.
178. Melrose R. J. et al. Florid osseous dysplasia. A clinicalpathologic study of thirty-four cases. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1976; 41 (1): 62-82.
179. Waldron C. A. et al. Sclerotic cemental masses of the jaws (socalled chronic sclerosing osteomyelitis, sclerosing osteitis, multiple enostosis, and gigantiform cementoma. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1975; 39 (4): 590-604.
180. MacDonald-Jankowski D. S. Fibro-osseous lesions of the face and jaws. Clin. Radiol. 2004Jan; 59 (1): 11-25. Review. Erratum in: Clin. Radiol. 2009; 64(1): 107.
181. Kawai T. et al. Cemento-osseous dysplasia of the jaws in 54 Japanese patients: a radiographic study. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1999; 87 (1): 107-114.
182. Wright J. M. Reactive, dysplastic and neoplastic conditions of periodontal ligament origin. Periodontol. 2000, 1999; 21:7-15.
183. Su L. et al. Distinguishing features of focal cemento-osseous dysplasia and cemento-ossifying fibromas. II. A clinical and radiologic spectrum of 316 cases. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1997; 84 (5): 540-549.
184. Summerlin D. J. et al. Focal cemento-osseous dysplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 221 cases. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1994; 78 (5): 611-620.
185. Waldron C. A. Fibro-osseous lesions of the jaws. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1993; 51 (8): 828-835.
186. Slootweg P. J. et al. Differential diagnosis of fibro-osseous jaw lesions. A histological investigation on 30 cases. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 1990; 18 (5): 210-214.
187. Waldron C. A. et al. Benign fibro-osseous lesions of the jaws: a clinical-radiologic-histologic review of sixty-five cases. II. Benign fibro-osseous lesions of periodontal ligament origin. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1973; 35 (3): 340-350.
188. Hamner J. E. 3rd et al. Benign fibro-osseous jaw lesions of periodontal membrane origin. An analysis of 249 cases. Cancer. 1968; 22 (4): 861-878.
189. Anderson L. et al. The influence of radiation therapy on dental implantology. Implant. Dent. 2013; 22 (1): 31-38.
190. Chadha G. К. et al. Osseointegration of dental implants and osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients treated with bisphosphonate therapy: a systematic review. J. Oral Implantol. 2013; 39 (4): 510-520.
191. Tam Y. et al. Osteonecrosis of the jaw after implant surgery in patients treated with bisphosphonates: a presentation of six consecutive cases. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. Epub ahead of print, 2013.
192. Resting М. R. et al. Severe osteomyelitis following immediate placement of a dental implant. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2008; 23 (1): 137-142.
193. Schulze D. et al. Diagnostic criteria for the detection of mandibular osteomyelitis using cone-beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2006; 35 (4): 232-235.
194. Crespi R. et al. Fresh-socket implants in periapical infected sites in humans. J. Periodontol. 2010; 81 (3): 378-383.
195. Lawrence М.М. Periapical abscess. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2011; 142 (2): 128.
196. Waasdorp J. A. et al. Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the literature. J. Periodontol. 2010; 81 (6): 801-808.
197. Neville B. W. et al. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2009.
198. Aggarwal V. et al. The evaluation of computed tomography scans and ultrasounds in the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions. J. Endod. 2008; 34 (11): 1312-1315.
199. Fehrenbach М. J. et al. Illustrated anatomy of the head and neck. 4th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier, 2012
200. Al-Ekrish А.А. et al. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2011; 40 (2): 67-75.
201. Chiarelli T. et al. A fully 3D work context for oral implant planning and simulation. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2010; 5 (1): 57-67.
202. Dantas J. A. et al. Computed tomography for dental implants: the influence of the gantry angle and mandibular positioning on the bone height and width. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2005; 34 (1): 9-15.
203. Mupparapu M. et al. Implant imaging for the dentist. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 2004; 70 (1): 32.
204. Kim K. D. et al. Effect of mandibular positioning on preimplant site measurement of the mandible in reformatted CT. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23 (2): 177-183.
205. Au-Yeung K.M. et al. Dentascan in oral imaging. Clin. Radiol. 2001; 56 (9): 700-713.
206. Cavalcanti M. G. et al. Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 1999; 28 (3): 137-140.
207. Yang J. et al. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1999; 87(3): 369-374.
208. Cavalcanti M. G. et al. Validation of spiral computed tomography for dental implants. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 1998; 27 (6): 329-333.
209. Schwarz M. S. et al. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent. Clin. North Am. 1989; 33 (4): 555-597.
210. McCollough С.Н. et al. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique. Med. Phys. 2013; 40 (6): 061904.
211. Schulz B. et al. Performance of iterative image reconstruction in CT of the paranasal sinuses: a phantom study. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2013; 34 (5): 1072-1076.
212. Niu Y. T. et al. Radiation dose reduction in temporal bone CT with iterative reconstruction technique. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012; 33 (6): 1020-1026.
213. Primo В. T. et al. Accuracy assessment of prototypes produced using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012; 41 (10): 1291-1295.
214. GE Medical Systems, Advantage DentaScan Operator Manual 2182400-100. General Electric Company, 2010.
215. Schwarz M. S. et al. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent. Clin. North Am. 1989; 33 (4): 555-597.
216. Schulz В. et al. Performance of iterative image reconstruction in CT of the paranasal sinuses: a phantom study. AJNR Am J. Neuroradiol. 2013; 34 (5): 1072-1076.
217. Goldman L. W. Principles of CT; multislice CT. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2008; 36 (2): 57-68; quiz 75-76.
218. Ramasamy М. et al. Implant surgical guides: from the past to the present. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2013; 5 (Suppl. 1): S98-S102.
219. Benavides E. et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent. 2012; 21 (2): 78-86.
220. Worthington P. et al. The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2010; 141 (Suppl. 3): 19S-24S.
221. Widmann G. et al. Errors and error management in imageguided craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2009; 107 (5): 701-715.
222. Lal K. et al. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept. J. Prosthodont. 2006; 15 (1): 51-58.
223. Lal K. et al. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part II. A clinical report. J. Prosthodont. 2006; 15 (2): 117-122.
224. Widmann G. et al. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery - a review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2006; 21 (2): 305-313.
225. Basten С.H. et al. The use of barium sulfate for implant templates. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1996; 76 (4): 451-454.
226. Friedland В et al: Virtual technologies in dentoalveolar evaluation and surgery. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 20(1):37-52, 2012
227. Stratemann SA et al: Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 37(2):80-93, 2008
228. Hatcher DC et al: Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc. 31(11):825-33, 2003
229. Rosa MB et al: Retrospective study of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve and the incisive canal using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 28(2):388-92, 2013
230. Benavides E et al: Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent. 21(2):78-86, 2012
231. Friedland В et al: Virtual technologies in dentoalveolar evaluation and surgery. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 20(l):37-52, 2012
232. Kilic E et al: Determination of lingual vascular canals in the interforaminal region before implant surgery to prevent lifethreatening bleeding complications. Clin Oral Implants Res. Epub ahead of print, 2012
233. Kourtis S et al: Presurgical planning in implant restorations: correct interpretation of cone-beam computed tomography for improved imaging. J Esthet Restor Dent. 24(5):321-32, 2012
234. Ganz SD: Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts. Dent Clin North Am. 55(3):515-36, viii, 2011
235. Hatcher DC: Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc. 141 Suppl 3:3S-6S, 2010
236. Curley A et al: Cone beam CT - anatomic assessment and legal issues: the new standards of care. J Calif Dent Assoc. 37(9):653-62, 2009
237. Tyndall DA et al: Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 113(6):817-26, 2012
238. European Commission: Radiation protection no. 172: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidencebased guidelines. A report prepared by the SEDENTEXCT project. Luxembourg: EC, 2011. Accessed October 2013
239. Ludlow JB et al: Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 144(6):802-17, 2013
240. Nemtoi A et al: Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 42(8):20120443, 2013
241. Al-Ekrish AA: Effect of exposure time on the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions in dry skulls. Saudi Dent J. 24(3-4):127-34, 2012
242. Scarfe WC et al: Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J. 57 Suppl 1:46-60, 2012
243. McCollough CH et al: Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 47(l):27-40, 2009
244. Ludlow JB et al: Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 106(l):106-14, 2008
245. Palomo JM et al: Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 105(6):773-82, 2008
246. van Daatselaar AN et al: Effect of number of projections on image quality of local CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 33(6):361-9, 2004
247. Bushberg JT et al: The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002
248. Horner К: Cone-beam computed tomography: time for an evidence-based approach. Prim Dent J. 2(1):22-31, 2013
249. Nemtoi A et al: Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 42(8):20120443, 2013
250. Correa LR et al: Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images. Clin Oral Implants Res. Epub ahead of print, 2013
251. Chan HL et al; Dental imaging in implant treatment planning. Implant Dent. 19(4):288-98, 2010
252. Monsour PA et al: Implant radiography and radiology. Aust Dent J. 53 Suppl 1: Sll-25, 2008
253. Vazquez L et al: Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 19(1):81-5, 2008
254. Anandakrishna GN et al: Pterygomaxillary implants: a graftless solution to deficient maxillary bone. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 12(3):182-6, 2012
255. Bedrossian E: Implant treatment planning for the edentulous patient, a graftless approach to immediate loading. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc., 2011
256. Reiser GM: Implant use in the tuberosity, pterygoid, and palatine region anatomic and surgical considerations. In Nevins M et al: Implant Therapy Clinical Approaches and Evidence of Success. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Books, 1998
257. Graves SL: The pterygoid plate implant: a solution for restoring the posterior maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 14(6):512-23, 1994
258. Chrcanovic BR et al: Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 17(2):81-93, 2013
259. Aparicio C: Zygomatic Implants, the Anatomy Guided Approach. London: Quintessence Publishing, 2012
260. Candel-Marti E et al: Rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxilla with zygomatic implants: review. J Oral Implantol. 38(5):653-7, 2012
261. Bedrossian E: Implant Treatment Planning for the Edentulous Patient. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2011
262. Balshi Т. J. et al. A retrospective analysis of 800 Branemark system implants following the All-on-four protocol. J. Prosthodont. 2014; 23 (2): 83-88.
263. Aparicio C. Zygomatic implants, the anatomy guided approach. 1st ed. London: Quintessence Publishing. 2012.
264. Bedrossian E. Implant treatment planning for the edentulous patient: A graftless approach to immediate loading. 1st ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier. 2011.
265. Behneke A. et al. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography-derived laboratory-based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 2012; 23 (2): 137-143.
266. Thomason J. M. et al. Two implant retained overdentures — a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. Dent. 2012; 40 (1): 22-34.
267. Drago C. et al. Treatment of maxillary jaws with dental implants: guidelines for treatment. J. Prosthodont. 2011; 20 (5): 336-347.
268. Widmann G. et al. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants. 2006; 21 (2): 305-313.
269. Al-Ani О. et al. Safe zone for bone harvesting from the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 2013; 24 (Suppl. A100): 115-121.
270. Cooper L. F. et al. «Rules of Six»-diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for single-tooth implant success. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2013; 34 (2):94-98,100-101; quiz 102,117.
271. Sadowsky S. J. et al. Evidenced-based criteria for differential treatment planning of implant restorations for the partially edentulous patient. J. Prosthodont. 2013; 22 (4): 319-329.
272. Behneke A. et al. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 2012; 23 (4): 416-423.
273. Romanos G. E. et al. Endosseous arteries in the anterior mandible: literature review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2012; 27 (1): 90-94.
274. Talwar N. et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a prosthodontic stent in determining the position of dental implants. J. Prosthodont. 2012; 21 (1): 42-47.
275. Turbush S. K. et al. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2012; 108 (3): 181-188.
276. Tyndall D. A. et al. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2012; 113 (6): 817-826.
277. Al-Faraje L. Surgical complications in implant dentistry. Hanover: Quintessence. 2011.
278. Gerlach N. L. et al. Reproducibility of 3 different tracing methods based on cone beam computed tomography in determining the anatomical position of the mandibular canal. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2010; 68 (4): 811-817.
279. Greenstein G. et al. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J. Periodontol. 2006; 77 (12): 1933-1943.
280. Widmann G. et al. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2006; 21 (2): 305-313.
281. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2005; 94 (1): 10-92.
282. Wittneben J. G. et al. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations in the esthetic zone: the dynamic compression technique. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33 (4): 447-455.
283. Grunder U. et al. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25 (2): 113-119.
284. Belser U. et al. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2004; 19 (Suppl.): 73-74.
285. Buser D. et al. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2004; 19 (Suppl.): 43-61.
286. Wang М. et al. A possible biomechanical role of occlusal cusp-fossa contact relationships. J. Oral Rehabil. 2013; 40 (1): 69-79.
287. Sato Y. et al. Verification of the influence of the arrangement of implants on the load distribution (a well-known figure by Rangert). J. Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39 (6): 446-449.
288. Dawson P. Functional occlusion from TMJ to smile design. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2007.
289. Appleton R. S. et al. A radiographic assessment of progressive loading on bone around single osseointegrated implants in the posterior maxilla. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16 (2): 161-167.
290. Kim Y. et al. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16(1): 26-35.
291. Gittelson G. L. Vertical dimension of occlusion in implant dentistry: significance and approach. Implant. Dent. 2002; 1 (1): 33-40.
292. Khamis M. M. et al. A comparison of the effect of different occlusal forms in mandibular implant overdentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1998; 79 (4): 422-429.
293. Demirel F. et al. The relations between alveolar ridge and the teeth located in neutral zone. J. Marmara Univ. Dent Fac. 1996; 2 (2-3): 562-566.
294. Engelman M. Clinical decision making & Treatment planning in osseointegration. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996.
295. Misch C.E. et al. Implant-protected occlusion. Pract. Periodontics Aesthet. Dent. 1995; 7 (5): 25-29.
296. Wismeijer D. et al. Factors to consider in selecting an occlusal concept for patients with implants in the edentulous mandible. Prosthet. Dent. 1995; 74 (4): 380-384.
297. Astrand P. et al. Combination of natural teeth and osseointegrated implants as prosthesis abutments: a 2-year longitudinal study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 1991; 6 (3): 305-312.
298. Rangert B. et al. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 1989; 4 (3): 241-247.
299. Kinni M.E. et al. Force transfer by osseointegration implant devices. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 1987; 2 (1): 11-14.
300. Morjaria К. R. et al. Bone healing after tooth extraction with or without an intervention: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2014; 16 (1): 1-20.
301. Sun Z. et al. Alveolar ridge reduction after tooth extraction in adolescents: an animal study. Arch. Oral Biol. 2013; 58 (7): 813-825.
302. Lambert F. et al. A methodological approach to assessing alveolar ridge preservation procedures in humans: hard tissue profile. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2012; 39 (9): 887-894.
303. Tan W. L. et al. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 2012; 23 (Suppl. 5): 1-21.
304. Van der Weijden F. et al. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2009; 36 (12): 1048-1058.
305. Mardinger O. et al. Morphologic changes of the nasopalatine canal related to dental implantation: a radiologic study in different degrees of absorbed maxillae. J. Periodontol. 2008; 79 (9): 4659-4662.
306. Misch C. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2008.
307. Sharan A. et al. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2008; 23(1): 48-56.
308. Araki К. et al. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24 (8): 862-865.
309. Arisan V. et al. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer- assisted implant placement. Part 1: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2013; 15 (6): 893-906.
310. Horner K. Cone-beam computed tomography: time for an evidence-based approach. Prim. Dent. J. 2013; 2 (1): 22-31.
311. Hsu J. T. et al. The assessment of trabecular bone parameters and cortical bone strength: a comparison of micro-CT and dental cone-beam CT. J. Biomech. 2013; 46 (15): 2611-2618.
312. Molteni R. Prospects and challenges of rendering tissue density in Hounsfield units for cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2013; 116 (1): 105-119.
313. Nomura Y. et al. Stability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral content. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24 (5): 543-548.
314. Devlin H. Identification of the risk for osteoporosis in dental patients. Dent Clin. North Am. 2012; 56 (4):847-861.
315. Tyndall D. A. et al. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2012; 113 (6): 817-826.
316. Ribeiro-Rotta R.F. et al. Ambiguity in bone tissue characteristics as presented in studies on dental implant planning and placement: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22 (8): 789-801.
317. Lee S. et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 3. Bone quality evaluation during osteotomy and implant placement. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2007; 22 (2): 208-212.
318. Davies J. Е. et al. Topographic scale-range synergy at the functional bone/implant interface. Biomaterials. 2014; 35 (1): 25-35.
319. University of Toronto. Bone Interface Group. Updated June 11, 2009. Accessed January 31,2014.
320. Davies J. E. Bone bonding at natural and biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials. 2007; 28 (34): 5058-5067.
321. Brunski J. B. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv. Dent. Res. 1999; 13:99-119.
322. Von Wilmowsky C. et al. Implants in bone: part I. A current overview about tissue response, surface modifications and future perspectives. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Epub ahead of print, 2013.
323. Geramy A. et al. Mini-implant loosening: 3D analysis using the finite element method. Orthodontics (Chic.). 2012; 13 (1): e51-e57.
324. Mistry S. et al. Comparison of bioactive glass coated and hydroxyapatite coated titanium dental implants in the human jaw bone. Aust. Dent. J. 2011; 56 (1): 68-75.
325. Pirker W. et al. Immediate, single stage, truly anatomic zirconia implant in lower molar replacement: a case report with 2.5 years follow-up. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2011; 40 (2): 212-216.
326. Chen Y. et al. Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135 (3): 284-291.
327. Pirker W et al. Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implants placed into single-rooted extraction sockets: 2-year follow-up of a clinical study. Int.). Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009; 38 (11): 1127-1132.
328. Ren Y. Mini-implants for direct or indirect orthodontic anchorage. Evid. Based Dent. 2009; 10 (4): 113.
329. Wu T. Y. et al. Factors associated with the stability of miniimplants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009; 67 (8): 1595-1599.
330. Leclercq P. et al. Rationale for a fixed implant-supported transitional prosthesis in full-arch implant restorations. Rev. Stomatol. Chir. Maxillofac. 2007; 108 (6): 530-535.
331. Jones A. A. et al. Consequences of implant design. Dent. Clin. North Am. 2006; 50 (3): 339-360.
332. Keller J. C. Physical and biological characteristics of implant materials. Adv. Dent. Res. 1999; 13:5-7.
333. LLC Infodontics. What implant is that? Accessed )anuary 23, 2014.
334. Cardoso R.C. et al. Survey of currently selected dental implants and restorations by prosthodontists. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants. 2013; 28 (4): 1017-1025.
335. Kopp S. et al. Dental implants and immediate loading: multivariate analysis of success factors. Rev. Stomatol. Chir. Maxillofac. Chir. Orale. 2013; 114 (3): 146-154.
336. Vairo G. et al. Comparative evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants based on platform-switching concept: influence of diameter, length, thread shape, and in-bone positioning depth on stress-based performance. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2013; 2013:250 929.
337. Shadid R. et al. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review.). Oral Implantol. 2012; 38 (3): 298-307.
338. Atieh M.A. et al. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Periodontol. 2010; 81 (10): 1350-1366.
339. Misch C.E. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier. 2008; 1120 p.
340. Lisa J. Koenig BChD, DDS, MS, Professor & Program Director, Oral Medicine and Oral Radiology Department of General Dental Sciences Marquette University School of Dentistry Milwaukee, Wisconsin
341. Salwa Omar Baiunaid, BDS, MSc DABKFACP, Assistant Brofess of Prosthodontics Departmenef Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
342. Asma'a Abdurrahman Al-Ekrish, BDS, MDS, Cert. Diag. Sci., Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
343. Todd Sawisch, DDS, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Private Practice, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
344. Shikha Rathi, BDS, MS, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Consultant Private Practice Beamreaders, Inc. Houston, Texas
345. Isaac Angel, DDS, Private Practice Limited to Periodontics Orlando, Florida
346. Avi Schetritt, DMD, Periodontist Private Practice Fort Lauderdale, Florida
347. Douglas L. Chenin, DDS, CEO, Clinically Correct, Inc. Moraga, California Director of Implant Services Beamreaders, Inc. Sacramento, California
348. Joanne Ethier, DMD, MBA, MS
349. Dania Faisal Tamimi, BDS, DMSc, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Consultant Private Practice, Beamreaders, Inc. Orlando, Florida
350. Bronwyn E. Hamilton, MD
351. Patricia A. Hudgins, MD, FACR
352. Richard W. Katzberg, MD
353. Bernadette L. Koch, MD
354. Nicholas A. Koontz, MD
355. Luke N. Ledbetter, MD
356. Daniel E. Meltzer, MD
357. Michelle A. Michel, MD
358. Kevin R. Moore, MD
359. Lisa J. Koenig, BChD, DDS, MS, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs Professor, Oral Medicine and Oral Radiology Marquette University School of Dentistry Milwaukee, Wisconsin
360. Dania Tamimi, BDS, DMSc, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Consultant Private Practice Orlando, Florida Adjunct Assistant Professor Department of Comprehensive Dentistry University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, Texas
361. Axel Ruprecht, DDS, MScD, FRCD(C), Professor Emeritus of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Professor Emeritus of Radiology Professor Emeritus of Anatomy and Cell Biology The University of Iowa Adjunct Clinical Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology University of Florida Gainesville, Florida
362. Byron W. Benson, DDS, MS, Regents Professor and Vice Chair Department of Diagnostic Sciences Texas A&M University College of Dentistry Dallas, Texas
363. C. Grace Petrikowski, DDS, MSc, FRCD(C), Oral and Maxillofacial Radiologist Huronia Maxillofacial Radiology Toronto, Ontario, Canada
364. David Hatcher, DDS, MSc, Clinical Professor, Orofacial Sciences School of Dentistry University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, California Clinical Professor, School of Dentistry University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, California Adjunct Professor, School of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics University of the Pacific San Francisco, California Clinical Professor Volunteer, Department of Surgical & Radiological Sciences School of Veterinary Medicine University of California, Davis Davis, California, Clinical Professor, School of Dentistry Roseman University of Health Sciences Henderson, Nevada, Private Practice, Diagnostic Digital Imaging Sacramento, California
365. Susanne E. Perschbacher, DDS, MSc, FRCD(C), Assistant Professor Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry Toronto, Ontario, Canada
366. Brad J. Potter, DDS, MS, Professor and Director of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences University of Colorado School of Dental Medicine Aurora, Colorado
367. H. Ric Harnsberger, MD, R.C. Willey Chair in Neuroradiology Professor of Radiology and Otolaryngology University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City, Utah
368. Barton F. Branstetter, IV, MD, FACR
369. Rebecca S. Cornelius, MD, FACR
370. Julia Crim, MD
371. H. Christian Davidson, MD
372. Kristine M. Mosier, DMD, PhD
373. Cheryl A. Petersilge, MD, MBA
374. Caroline D. Robson, MBChB
375. Jeffrey S. Ross, MD
376. Lubdha M. Shah, MD
377. Deborah R. Shatzkes, MD
378. Hilda E. Stambuk, MD
379. Margot L. Van Dis, DDS, MS
380. Richard H. Wiggins, III, MD, CMP, FSIIM

В ходе подготовки статей данного раздела - отечественная литература не использовалась.

Редактор: Искандер Милевски. Дата публикации: 24.3.2022